- Short Report
- Open Access
Effect of different UCOE-promoter combinations in creation of engineered cell lines for the production of Factor VIII
© Hermiston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 15 December 2010
- Accepted: 10 June 2011
- Published: 10 June 2011
The most common approach used in generating cell lines for the production of therapetic proteins relies on gene amplification induced by a drug resistance gene e. g., DHFR and glutamine synthetase. Practically, this results in screening large number of clones for the one that expresses high levels of the biologic in a stable manner. The inefficiency of mammalian vector systems to express proteins in a stable manner typically involves silencing of the exogenous gene resulting from modifications such as methylation of CpG DNA sequences, histone deacetylation and chromatin condensation. The use of un-methylated CpG island fragments from housekeeping genes referred to as UCOE (ubiquitous chromatin opening elements) in plasmid vectors is now well established for increased stability of transgene expression. However, few UCOE-promoter combinations have been studied to date and in this report we have tested 14 different combinations.
In this report we describe studies with two different UCOEs (the 1.5 Kb human RNP fragment and the 3.2 Kb mouse RPS3 fragment) in combination with various promoters to express a large protein (B domain deleted factor VIII; BDD-FVIII) in a production cell line, BHK21. We show here that there are differences in expression of BDD-FVIII by the different UCOE-promoter combinations in both attached and serum free suspension adapted cells. In all cases, the 1.5 Kb human RNP UCOE performed better in expressing BDD-FVIII than their corresponding 3.2 Kb mouse RPS3 UCOE. Surprisingly, in certain scenarios described here, expression from a number of promoters was equivalent or higher than the commonly used and industry standard human CMV promoter.
This study indicates that certain UCOE-promoter combinations are better than others in expressing the BDD-FVIII protein in a stable manner in BHK21 cells. An empirical study such as this is required to determine the best combination of UCOE-promoter in a vector for a particular production cell line.
- BHK21 Cell
- Stable Manner
- Production Cell Line
- Serum Free Suspension
- Ubiquitous Chromatin Opening Element
The production of a protein therapeutic depends on a number of different factors including expression, stability of the cell line, post translational modifications, protein trafficking, secretion and viability of cells when grown to high density in a bioreactor. The first step in creating a production cell line is the transfection of an expression vector that encodes the biologic. Levels of RNA expression depend on the expression vector used. Numerous commercially available mammalian expression vectors are available that utilize different regulatory elements to maximize the expression of the therapeutic protein including promoters and enhancers, post-transcriptional elements such as WPRE and sequences that control the termination of transcription. Besides the levels of protein expressed, achieving reliable and stable transgene expression in mammalian cells is another major challenge. The inefficiency of mammalian vector systems to express proteins in a stable manner typically involves silencing of the exogenous gene that results from modification of the integrated vector or its vicinity, such as methylation of CpG DNA sequences, histone deacetylation and chromatin condensation [1–3]. Most conventional vectors suffer from position effects and chromatin shut down thus resulting in gene silencing over time. Chromatin position effects makes the generation of mammalian cell lines expressing the protein therapeutic a difficult, time consuming and expensive process. The most commonly used approach used in the generation of such cell lines relies on gene amplification induced by a combination of a drug resistance gene e. g., DHFR and glutamine synthetase [4, 5] and stringent selective pressure. The DHFR and glutamine synthetase (GS) genes are mainly used for selection in CHO and NSO cells, respectively. In both cases, the selection occurs in the absence of appropriate metabolite (s): glycine, hypoxanthine, and thymidine for DHFR and glutamine for GS. Both these markers have the advantage of supporting amplification of the copy number of the integrated DNA by exposure of selected cells to increasing amounts of methotrexate (MTX) or methionine sulphoximine (MSX), respectively . Practically, this would result in screening a large number of clones for the one that expresses high levels of the biologic in a stable manner. There have been recent studies that have addressed the critical issue of stable expression. As an example, the inclusion of MAR (matrix associated regions) in the vector system has been exploited to increase the stability of expression of a number of exogenous genes in mammalian cells [7–10]. In addition, the discovery that certain un-methylated CpG sequences of housekeeping genes known as UCOE (ubiquitous chromatin opening elements) confers resistance to heterochromatin-mediated silencing has led to the incorporation of these elements into expression vectors including lentiviral vectors [11–13]. The addition of the UCOE in the expression vector is thought to create a transcriptionally active, open chromatin environment around an integrated transgene, maximizing its potential to be transcribed into protein and this effect is irrespective of the position of the transgene in the chromosome. The UCOE expression technology therefore provides major improvements in gene expression in stably-transfected mammalian cells through effects on the structure of chromatin (irrespective of chromosomal integration site) which results in the prevention of transgene silencing and gives consistent, stable and high-level gene expression. Therefore, by nature of the inherent properties of UCOE, the screening for cell lines that express high amounts of the biologic is less labor, time and cost intensive than other methods. Also, the chance of selecting a clone that is highly stable is better with plasmid vectors containing the UCOE.
There have been previous reports that large fragment containing the CpG islands from the human HNRPA2B1 and TBP-PSNB1 loci (designated RNP and TBP) are resistant to heterochromatin mediated silencing of endogenous genes transcribed from promoters associated with these genes . The RNP UCOE is derived from and consists of the dual divergently transcribed promoter region of the HNRPA2B1-CBX3 genes, whereas the RPS3 UCOE consists of a single promoter element .
Also, a strong promoter, namely the human CMV promoter (hCMV) that is preceded by a large portion of the RNP CpG island (8 Kb) confers major benefits in transgene expression from this promoter when incorporated in a plasmid vector . Reducing the CpG island fragment of the RNP locus to 1.5 Kb still conferred the benefits of expression and stability .
As far as we know, this is the first extensive study comparing different promoter-UCOE combinations has been undertaken. In this study, the 1.5 Kb RNP UCOE was compared to the 3.2 Kb mouse ribosomal protein S3 (RPS3) gene locus UCOE in the context of a number of different promoters including hCMV to express the transgene BDD-FVIII (B-domain deleted factor VIII) in the production line BHK21.
Comparison of the different UCOE-promoter combinations in adherent BHK21 cells
An earlier study compared different lengths of the human RNP CpG fragments in a vector system in the context of a strong promoter, hCMV (14). In that study, three different CpG fragment sizes were analyzed: 8.0 Kb, 4.0 Kb and 1.5 Kb. The 1.5 Kb fragment was able to confer stable high expression levels of transgene expression. Here, we constructed 7 different 1.5 Kb UCOE promoter combinations, and 7 different 3.2 Kb UCOE promoter combinations including the 1.5 Kb RNP UCOE with the hCMV promoter to drive the expression of BDD-FVIII in the production cell line BHK21.
Comparison of the different UCOE-promoter combinations in serum free suspension adapted BHK21 cells
BHK21 cells were adapted to suspension culture by serum weaning so that they could be maintained in a serum free environment. The main advantage of growing these cells in serum free media is that the production cells are not in contact with animal proteins, and that would help purify the secreted therapeutic protein without any serum protein "contaminant". Even small levels of serum protein in the purified product will likely increase the chance of an immune response to the biologic in patients receiving treatment. The cells that were derived by the adaptation of BHK21 cells to suspension grew to a density of 4.6 × 106/ml, were over 93% viable and had a doubling time of 20 hours in serum free media. The transfection of suspension adapted BHK21 cells in serum free media has traditionally been inefficient. Therefore in the past, to create a BHK21 production cell line required first the transfection of adherent cells, followed by generating stable lines as adherent cultures and then adapting these to serum free suspension culture. The advantage of transfecting serum free cells grown in suspension culture can not be underestimated as it saves time, effort and resources that ultimately results in reduced cost of goods.
Stability of the UCOE promoter derived cell lines
Serum free suspension BHK21 cells from the 1.5 Kb human RNP-promoter combinations were cultured for a period of two months to study the stability of these pooled populations. Activity (Figure 5A) and relative DNA copies (Figure 5B) were measured at one and two months post transfection. There was no significant difference in activity in most cases, except that there was a reduction in the case of the mCMV and SRα promoter based cell line and a slight increase in activity in the case of the MPSV promoter (Figure 5A). The reduction in activity in SRα promoter cell line may be attributed to the reduction in relative DNA integrated copies, and the reduction in the mCMV promoter cell line seems not to be due to a reduction in copy number, but due to some post integration phenomenon (Figure 5B). Recently it has been shown that the ability of UCOE to confer stability of expression on a linked promoter is due at least in part to it being able to negate DNA-methylation mediated silencing [13, 15], and this may contribute towards the observed stability in most of the UCOE-promoter combinations tested but not all (loss of stability in the case of mCMV and SRa).
The 1.5 Kb human RNP CpG fragment has previously been shown to confer higher expression and stability of the transgene in production cells when placed ahead of the hCMV promoter. We investigated two UCOE fragments, the 1.5 Kb human RNP CpG fragment and the 3.2 Kb mouse RPS3 fragment. These UCOE fragments were placed upstream of seven different commonly used promoters to generate 14 different plasmid vectors that encode the FVIII-BDD cDNA to study the effect of the UCOE sequence and the combination of the different promoters to express FVIII-BDD in BHK21 cells.
We observed that in combination with the different promoters, the corresponding 1.5 Kb UCOE is better than the 3.2 Kb UCOE at expressing FVIII-BDD in both attached and serum free suspension adapted BHK21 cells. The differential integration of the 1.5 Kb UCOE and the 3.2 Kb UCOE plasmids can not be attributed to this as the relative copy numbers of integrated plasmids in pooled populations of established cells were not sufficiently different to explain the differences in expression by the two UCOEs. The dual divergently transcribed promoter of the HNRPA2B1-CBX3 genes may contribute towards this phenomenon. Based on this, we conclude that the 1.5 Kb RNP fragment is a better choice for the expression of the FVIII-BDD transgene in BHK21 cells.
From transient transfection studies we conclude that in both adherent and suspension adapted BHK21 cells, all the promoters were better than the gCMV promoter, except the hCMV promoter in the context of the 1.5 Kb UCOE is better than the corresponding gCMV promoter. The similarities in the expression trends between suspension adapted and adherent BHK21 cells suggests that the transcriptional machinery is similar in the two morphologically different cell types that were derived from the same parental BHK21 cells. However, we observed differences in expression level trends when these plasmids were transfected into other cell types.
When the transfected cells were cultured for over a month, there were many unexpected observations. In the case of adherent cells, there was a substantial loss of expression from the mCMV and the SRα promoters when compared to the gCMV promoter and the Ubc promoter based expression seemed to increase relative to the gCMV promoter. These changes were not due to large differences in copy numbers. The decrease in expression levels may be explained by DNA methylation mediated gene silencing over time. It is however difficult to explain the increased expression by the Ubc promoter. Suspension adapted cells grown for a month showed differences in gene expression levels, but these may be a result of differences in gene copy numbers. These cells are stable as the activity levels nor the gene copies changed after an additional month of continuous culture under selection. There was no silencing observed. The only significant change was decreased expression from the SRα promoter and that can be explained as a result of decreased number of integrated copies that may be a result of shift in population pools.
We conclude that an empirical study such as this is necessary to evaluate the expression vector system for a given production cell line. Also, optimizing conditions for transfection in suspension adapted serum free BHK21 cells can be achieved and is beneficial in not only saving time and resources, but also in the purification of the biologic with fewer protein contaminants resulting in reduced immunogenicity.
The authors wish to thank Fang Jin and Sarasijam Joshi for their support on protocols and reagents.
- Fuks F: DNA methylation and histone modidications: teaming up to silence genes. Current opinion in genetics and development. 2005, 15: 490-495. 10.1016/j.gde.2005.08.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Razin A: CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing - a three-way connection. EMBO. 1998, 17: 4905-4908. 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bird AP, Wolffe AP: Methylation-induced repression - belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell. 1999, 99: 451-454. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81532-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman RJ: Vectors used for expression in mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 186: 487-511.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnes LM: Advances in animal cell recombinant protein production: GS-NSO expression system. Cytotechnol. 2000, 32: 109-123. 10.1023/A:1008170710003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wurm FM: Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nature Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 1393-1398. 10.1038/nbt1026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stief A, Winter DM, Strätling WH, Sippel AE: A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989, 28: 343-345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phi-Van L, von Kries JP, Ostertag W, Strätling WH: The chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment region increases transcription from a heterologous promoter in heterologous cells and dampens position effects on the expression of transfected genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990, 10: 2302-7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klehr D, Maass K, Bode J: Scaffold-attached regions from the human interferon beta domain can be used to enhance the stable expression of genes under the control of various promoters. Biochemistry. 1991, 30: 1264-70. 10.1021/bi00219a015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Girod PA, Nguyen DQ, Calabrese D, Puttini S, Grandjean M, Martinet D, Regamey A, Saugy D, Beckmann JS, Bucher P, Mermod N: Genome-wide prediction of matrix attachment regions that increase gene expression in mammalian cells. Nat Methods. 2007, 4: 747-53. 10.1038/nmeth1076.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benton , Chen , McEntree , Fox , King , Crombie , Thomas , Bebbington : The use of UCOE vectors in combination with a preadapted serum free, suspension cell line allows for rapid production of large quantities of protein. Cytotechnology. 2002, 38: 43-46. 10.1023/A:1021141712344.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Thornhill SI, Howe SJ, Ulaganathan M, Schambach A, Sinclair J, Kinnon C, Gaspar HB, Antoniou M, Thrasher AJ: Lentiviral vectors containing an enhancer-less ubiquitously acting chromatin opening element (UCOE) provide highly reproducible and stable transgene expression in hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2007, 110: 1448-57. 10.1182/blood-2006-12-060814.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Frost AR, Blundell MP, Bales O, Antoniou MN, Thrasher AJ: A ubiquitous chromatin opening element (UCOE) confers resistance to DNA methylation-mediated silencing of lentiviral vectors. Mol Ther. 2010, 18: 1640-1649. 10.1038/mt.2010.132.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Antoniou M, Harland L, Mustoe T, Williams S, Holdstock J, Yague E, Mulcahy T, Griffiths M, Edwards S, Ioannou PA, Mountain A, Crombie R: Transgenes encompassing dual-promoter CpG islands from the human TBP and HNRPA2B1 loci are resistant to heterochromatin-mediated silencing. Genomics. 2003, 269-279. 82Google Scholar
- Lindahl Allen M, Antoniou M: Correlation of DNA methylation with histone modifications across the HNRPA2B1-CBX3 ubiquitously-acting chromatin open element (UCOE). Epigenetics. 2007, 2: 227-36. 10.4161/epi.2.4.5231.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams S, Mustoe T, Mulcahy T, Griffiths M, Simpson D, Antoniou M, Irvine A, Mountain A, Crombie R: CpG-island fragments from the HNRPA2B1/CBX3 genomic locus reduce silencing and enhance transgene expression from the hCMV promoter/enhancer in mammalian cells. BMC Biotechnol. 2005, 5: 17-10.1186/1472-6750-5-17.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.