- Short Report
- Open Access
Evaluation of real-time PCR of patient pleural effusion for diagnosis of tuberculosis
© Rosso et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 8 March 2011
- Accepted: 5 August 2011
- Published: 5 August 2011
Pleural tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis often requires invasive procedures such as pleural biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the IS 6110 sequence of M. tuberculosis in pleural fluid specimens as a rapid and non-invasive test for pleural TB diagnosis.
For this cross-sectional study, 150 consecutive patients with pleural effusion diagnosed by chest radiography, who were referred for diagnostic thoracocentesis and pleural biopsy and met eligibility criteria, had a pleural fluid specimen submitted for real-time PCR testing. Overall, 98 patients had pleural TB and 52 had pleural effusion secondary to other disease. TB diagnosis was obtained using acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear or culture for mycobacteria and/or histopathologic examination in 94 cases and by clinical findings in 4 cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of PCR testing for pleural TB diagnosis were 42.8% (95% CI 38.4 - 44.8), 94.2% (95% CI 85.8 - 98.0), 93.3% (95% CI 83.6 - 97.7), and 48.5% (95% CI 44.2 - 50.4), respectively. The real-time PCR test improved TB detection from 30.6% to 42.9% when compared to AFB smear and culture methods performed on pleural fluid specimens, although the best sensitivity was achieved by combining the results of culture and histopathology of pleural tissue specimens.
The real-time PCR test of pleural fluid specimens is a useful and non-invasive additional assay for fast diagnosis of pleural TB.
- Pleural Effusion
- Pleural Fluid
- Nucleic Acid Amplification
- Conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Pleural Biopsy
Diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis (TB) remains a challenge due to its nonspecific clinical presentation and paucibacillary nature. Conventional methods, such as direct testing for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and culture of pleural fluid, lack sensitivity (less than 5% and 40%, respectively) [1–3]. Despite improved detection rates with new methods, high pleural fluid levels of adenosine deaminase (ADA) may be found in other diseases, especially empyema and parapneumonic effusions, and there is no established cut-off value for measurement of interferon-gamma in pleural fluid [4, 5].
Therefore, a definitive diagnosis of pleural TB still depends on demonstration of M. tuberculosis or caseous granulomas in pleural biopsy, an invasive method with possible complications requiring specialized medical care that is not widely available . Nucleic acid amplification assays allow the direct detection of M. tuberculosis in clinical specimens within hours of their receipt in the laboratory, providing a potential tool for diagnosing paucibacillary forms of TB . Although the role of nucleic acid amplification tests has been reasonably well defined in pulmonary tuberculosis, their place in pleurisy evaluation is not clear [7, 8]. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a technology that has advantages over conventional PCR testing, such as the fast availability of results, decreased risk of contamination and quantification of bacterial load .
In Brazil, TB has an initial presentation as a pleural disease in about 9% of adults and is the main cause of pleural effusion, corresponding to over 50% of cases [10, 11]. In this study, we evaluated the role of a real-time PCR assay for the IS 6110 sequence of M. tuberculosis in pleural fluid specimens to evaluate the efficiency and practicality of the test for diagnosing pleural TB.
From January 2003 to July 2005, all patients presenting with pleural effusion on chest radiography referred by their clinicians to the Pulmonary Service for Diagnostic Methods, Thoracic Diseases Institute/Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital Federal University of Rio de Janeiro for diagnostic thoracocentesis were eligible for the study. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years old, absence of known history or clinical or radiographic evidence of renal, cardiac or liver failure, and no known diagnosis of cancer or TB at the moment of enrollment. All included patients signed a consent form and were submitted to an interview, physical examination, and thoracocentesis followed by pleural biopsy with Cope's needle. Patients were excluded from the study if the diagnostic procedures were not completed or if the pleural effusion etiology remained undetermined at the end of the diagnostic investigation. Pleural effusion was deemed limited if it affected less than one third of the hemithorax, moderate if it affected between one third and two thirds of the hemithorax, and extensive if it affected more than two thirds of the hemithorax. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and of the State Foundation of Health Research and Production of Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Two pleural biopsy fragments and an aliquot of pleural fluid were stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen method and cultured in Löwenstein Jensen and Sabouraud medium following standard protocols . All specimens with positive mycobacteria culture results were tested using biochemical methods to distinguish M. tuberculosis from other nontuberculous mycobacteria. Three pleural biopsy fragments were submitted to histopathological examination after hematoxylin and eosin staining, and an aliquot of pleural fluid was stained using the Papanicolaou method. Immediately after pleural fluid collection, an aliquot of 500 μL was frozen at -20°C and sent to the State Foundation of Health Research and Production of Porto Alegre for real-time PCR testing.
Pleural TB definition
A diagnosis of pleural TB was made using the following tests: AFB smear, the growth of M. tuberculosis (MTB) in pleural fluid or pleural biopsy tissue, the presence of granulomatous inflammation in histopathologic study of the pleural biopsy tissue, or the resolution of clinical and radiograph abnormalities after six months of standard antituberculosis treatment (clinical diagnosis).
DNA was extracted from clinical specimens according to previously described methodology with modifications . Briefly, pleural fluid samples were concentrated by centrifugation, and 100 μL of lysis buffer (8 M guanidine hydrochloride, 0.08 M Tris HCl, 0.04 M EDTA and 2% Triton X-100) was added to the pellet and vortexed. Lysed samples were boiled for 10 min and centrifuged, and the resultant supernatants were transferred to a tube containing 2.5 μL of silica suspension. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed twice with washing buffer (8 M guanidine hydrochloride and 0.08 M Tris HCl) and once with 70% ethanol. The tubes were dried with closed lids at 56°C for 10 min and with open lids at room temperature for 5 min. Elution buffer (1× TE) was added, and the tubes were homogenized and incubated for 10 min at 56°C. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected for further experimentation. An extraction negative control (tube containing no organisms) and an extraction positive control (dilution of a commercial M. tuberculosis H37Rv reference strain ATCC27294 containing 50 colony forming units) were processed in each set of DNA extractions.
Real-time PCR assay
Amplification reactions were performed with primers INS-1/INS-2 as previously described, which generated a 245-base pair (bp) amplification product . PCR was performed using the ABI Prism 7500 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California), and the amplified product was detected with SYBR Green I dye. The reaction was optimized to obtain the best amplification kinetics. The final reaction volume (20 μL) contained a mixture of 5 μL of extracted target DNA, 10 μL (0.8 ×) of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), primers INS-1/INS-2 (5 pmol) and water. After 2 min of incubation at 50°C and 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles of amplification were performed with a thermal profile of 95°C for 15 sec and 68 °C for 1 min. A final cycle (95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min, 95°C for 15 sec) was added for the dissociation curve. The amplification and dissociation curves were analyzed with 7500 System Software (Applied Biosystems) with threshold and baseline analysis autodefined by the software. A negative control (master mix with water instead of template DNA) and a positive control (pAMP-1 plasmid containing an IS 6110 245-bp inserted fragment) were included for each set of PCRs. The sample was defined as positive when it had a detectable cycle threshold (Ct) and the melting temperature (Tm) was the same as for the positive control (88.8°C). Our group has obtained successful results using the IS 6110 region to detect M. tuberculosis complex DNA, and thus this region was chosen for the study [15, 16].
Presence of inhibitors
For all specimens with negative results, an internal control (pAMP-1 plasmid containing an exogenous 600-bp fragment obtained from the pUC13 plasmid digested with Eco RI enzyme) was added to the PCR (10 fg/μL, the detection limit concentration) to evaluate the presence of inhibitors. This sequence was amplified as described by Cortez-Herrera et al  using the same primers INS-1/INS-2 to generate a 664 bp amplicon. PCR products were analyzed using electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized with an ultra-violet illuminator to allow the identification of the amplicon size .
The Chi-squared test was used to compare frequencies between groups, and Fisher's exact test was used when the absolute number compared was less than 5. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0 software (SPSS Ins. Chicago, IL, USA).
Demographic characteristics of 150 patients with pleural effusion.
(n = 98)
non-TB(n = 52)
Mean age (years)
Gender [n (%)]
Race [n (%)]
Pleural effusion extension* & [n (%)]
Pleural effusion location* [n (%)]
Parenchyma alteration* [n (%)]
Among the pleural TB cases, 4 (4%) were diagnosed based on the resolution of clinical and radiograph abnormalities after six months of standard anti-TB treatment, and 94 (96%) had diagnosis confirmed by laboratory methods. The most frequent finding was the demonstration of granuloma in pleural biopsy (88.8%; 87/98 patients). AFB smear in pleural fluid and pleura tissue specimens contributed one case each (1%). Both also had cultures positive for MTB. The culture was positive in pleural fluid and pleural tissue specimens in 30.6% (30/98) and 64.3% (63/98) of the patients, respectively.
Accuracy of real-time PCR testing in pleural fluid for TB diagnosis.
Positive (n = 45)
Negative (n = 101)
(38.4 - 44.8)
(83.6 - 97.7)
Inhibited (n = 4)
(85.8 - 98.0)
(44.2 - 50.4)
Total (n = 150)
Results of real-time PCR testing, culture for MTB (pleural/tissue specimen), and histopathologic study (presence of granulomatous inflammation in pleural tissue) among 98* patients with pleural TB diagnosis.
Culture for MTB in pleural fluid
Culture for MTB in pleural tissue
Histopathologic study of pleural tissue
Molecular methods have been shown to be important tools for confirming pleural TB diagnosis because of their high specificity (>90%), but they are non-invasive and low risk, unlike the gold-standard method of pleural biopsy . Nevertheless, the sensitivity of PCR testing has been varied, ranging from 37% - 77% across studies, mainly due to different target nucleic acid sequences and the amplification methods used . Low sensitivity values can be explained by the low bacillary load and the presence of substances that inhibit amplification in pleural fluid . Some studies comparing conventional PCR methods with real-time PCR testing have demonstrated higher sensitivities for the latter (difference of about 30% with real-time PCR sensitivity up to 68%) when both tests are performed in the same specimens, especially in pleural biopsies [19, 20]. In addition, real-time PCR has the advantages of short turn-around time, lower risk of sample contamination, and ability to quantify bacterial load, raising interest for its use in pleural effusion tests .
Our study evaluated the real-time PCR testing in pleural fluid, which does not require an invasive procedure for specimen collection, a fact that should be considered in a setting where pleural biopsy is not widely available. Our results demonstrated real-time PCR sensitivity of 42.8% when TB cases are defined based on clinical criteria (with or without laboratory confirmation). Although we have found higher PCR sensitivity than other studies evaluating similar clinical specimens and target nucleic acid sequences for amplification (IS 6110) [21–24], our results corroborate the suboptimal sensitivity as the main limitation of PCR testing for replacing conventional diagnostic tests for diagnosis of pleural TB. Pleural fluid specimens in 4 patients with positive culture for TB and demonstration of granuloma in pleural biopsy repeatedly demonstrated inhibition of the nucleic acid amplification reaction. Nonetheless, even without these substances and the 4 false negative results, test sensitivity would not be much improved, from 42.8% to 46.9%. Three false positive samples were observed. This could be potentially due to cross-contamination that could have occurred during specimen processing, although the guidelines for diagnostic methods were followed. The guidelines include unidirectional work flow comprising the physical separation of specimen processing and reagent preparation and the use of positive and negative controls during DNA extraction and PCR amplification [16, 25].
Real-time PCR of pleural fluid was able to detect TB in 30 patients with negative AFB smears and culture in pleural fluid and in 3 of 4 patients with pleural TB diagnosed based on clinical criteria alone. Therefore, PCR testing was responsible for an improvement in TB diagnosis from 30.6% to 42.9% when compared to AFB smear and culture methods performed on pleural fluid specimens. In addition, the combined results of culture and PCR in pleural fluid specimens provided an even better rate of pleural TB detection of 61.2% (60/98). Although the best sensitivity was achieved by combining the results of pleura tissue culture and histopathology (91.8%, 90/98), the prompt confirmation of tuberculous pleuritis in about 43% of the patients using the PCR test would allow early treatment initiation. Rapid diagnosis and initiation of chemotherapy are essential to prevent secondary fibrothorax and to avoid subsequent pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB development .
Therefore, a negative PCR result does not exclude the diagnosis of pleural TB, as shown in our study, with approximately 50% of the patents with a negative PCR result had a pleural TB diagnosis. Thus, the role of real-time PCR in pleural fluid specimens of patients suspected of having TB would be to rapidly confirm the disease without waiting for culture and histopathologic results. Especially in settings with high TB prevalence, real-time PCR would provide substantial savings for both the patient and the health care provider in terms of an earlier definitive diagnosis, optimum patient care, improved outcomes, and reduced health-care costs .
A real-time PCR assay from pleural fluid specimen is a useful and non-invasive additional test for fast diagnosis of pleural TB.
We thank Anne Efron (Johns Hopkins University; Center for TB Research) for her critical review of the manuscript. This study was supported by the Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro/FAPERJ (E 26 100.653/2007 - bolsa/BBP).
- Berger HW, Mejia E: Tuberculous pleurisy. Chest. 1973, 63: 88-92. 10.1378/chest.63.1.88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nance KV, Shermer RW, Askin FB: Diagnostic efficacy of pleural biopsy as compared with that of pleural fluid examination. Mod Pathol. 1991, 4: 320-324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valdes L, lvarez DA, San Jose E, Penela P, Valle JM, Garcıa-Pazos JM, Suarez J, Pose A: Tuberculous Pleurisy. A Study of 254 Patients. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158: 2017-2021. 10.1001/archinte.158.18.2017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gopi A, Madhavan S, Sharma SK: Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion in 2006. Chest. 2007, 131: 880-889. 10.1378/chest.06-2063.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Light RW: Update on tuberculous pleural effusion. Respirology. 2010, 15: 451-458. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01723.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diacon AH, Van de Wal BW, Wyser C, Smedema JP, Bezuidenhout J, Bolliger CT, Walzl G: Diagnostic tools in tuberculous pleurisy: a direct comparative study. Eur Respir J. 2003, 22: 589-591. 10.1183/09031936.03.00017103a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Updated Guidelines for the Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis. MMWR. 2009, 58: 7-10.Google Scholar
- Pai M, Flores LL, Hubbard A, Riley LW, Colford JM: Nucleic acid amplification tets in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2004, 4: 6-20. 10.1186/1471-2334-4-6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Espy MJ, Uhl JR, Sloan LM, Buckwalter SP, Jones MF, Vetter EA, Yao JD, Wengenack NL, Rosenblatt JE, Cockerill FR, Smith TF: Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006, 19: 165-256. 10.1128/CMR.19.1.165-256.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morisson P, Neves DD: Evaluation of adenosine deaminase in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis: a Brazilian meta-analysis. J Bras Pneumol. 2008, 34: 217-224.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seiscento M, Vargas FS, Rujula MJP, Bombarda S, Uip DE, Galesi VMN: Epidemiological aspects of pleural tuberculosis in the state of São Paulo, Brazil (1998-2005). J Bras Pneumol. 2009, 35: 548-554. 10.1590/S1806-37132009000600008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kent PT, Kubica GP: Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for level III laboratory. Atlanta: Centers of Disease Control Publication. 1985, N° PB 86-216-546Google Scholar
- Boom R, Sol CJA, Salimans MMM, Jansen CL, Dillen PMEW, Noordaa JV: Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microb. 1990, 28: 495-503.Google Scholar
- Hermans PW, van Sooligen D, Dale JW, Schuitema AR, McAdam RA, Catty D, van Embden JD: Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microb. 1990, 28: 2051-2058.Google Scholar
- Verza M, Maschmann RA, Silva MS, Dalla Costa ER, Ribeiro MO, Rosso F, Suffys PN, Tortoli E, Marcelli F, Zaha A, Rossetti MRL: In house colorimetric reverse hybridisation assay for detection of the mutation most frequently associated with resistance to isoniazid in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104: 710-714. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000500008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michelon CT, Rosso F, Schmid KB, Sperhacke RD, Oliveira MM, Kritski AL, Rezende L, Costa ERD, Ribeiro AW, Verza M, Cafrune PI, Nunes MS, Kuhleis D, Zaha A, Rossetti MLR: Colorimetric microwell plate reverse-hybridization assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2011, 106 (2): 194-199.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cortez-Herrera E, Sperhacke RD, Becker D, Kritski A, Zaha A, Rossetti MLR: Internal control in PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis: usefulness and improvement of the diagnosis. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2008, 51: 485-491. 10.1590/S1516-89132008000400006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagesh BS, Sehgal S, Jindal SK, Arora SK: Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pleural fluid. Chest. 2001, 119: 1737-1741. 10.1378/chest.119.6.1737.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baba K, Pathak S, Sviland L, Langeland N, Hoosen AA, Asjo B, Dyrhol-Riise AM, Mustafa T: Real-time quantitative PCR in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pleural tissue in patients from a high HIV endemic area. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2008, 17: 112-117. 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31814ceac3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hillemann D, Galle J, Vollmer E, Richter E: Real-time PCR assay for improved detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in paraffin-embedded tissues. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006, 10: 340-342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moon JW, Chang Y S, Kim SK, Kim YS, Lee HM, Kim SK, Chang J: The clinical utility of polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 41: 660-666. 10.1086/432474.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunisha P, Madhavan HN, Jayanthi U, Therese KL: Polymerase chain reaction using IS6110 primer to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001, 44: 97-102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Villena V, Rebollo MJ, Aguado JM, Galan A, Lopez Encuentra A, Palenque E: Polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998, 26: 212-214. 10.1086/517025.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lima D, Colares JK, Fonseca BAL: Combined use of the polymerase chain reaction and detection of adenosine deaminase activity on pleural fluid improves the rate of diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. Chest. 2003, 124: 909-914. 10.1378/chest.124.3.909.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chakravorty S, Sen MK, Tyagi JS: Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by smear, culture, and PCR using universal sample processing technology. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4357-4362. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4357-4362.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.