Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the 454 assemblies of barcoded BACs with their Sanger reference sequences.

From: Sequencing of BAC pools by different next generation sequencing platforms and strategies

BAC

Data sets1

sequence depth

average read length (bp)

L50 (bp)

L80 (bp)

misass2

gaps

total gap size (bp)

penalties3

 

bcFLX

27

224

52,352

52,352

0

1

50

1

184G09 120,562 bp

bcTi

56

256

121,630

121,630

0

0

0

0

 

bcTids

27

256

120,569

120,569

0

0

0

0

 

bcFLX

15

225

11,912

3,586

6

9

490

21

259I16 124,050 bp

bcTi

25

253

68,888

14,394

2

3

177

7

 

bcTids

15

253

24,258

10,367

6

5

355

17

 

bcFLX

26

223

52,601

11,098

6

5

199

17

631P08 101,158 bp

bcTi

66

252

25,788

17,610

2

2

77

6

 

bcTids

26

252

52,257

17,582

1

1

14

3

 

bcFLX

26

219

16,866

3,203

17

4

392

38

711N16 112,178 bp

bcTi

41

292

21,923

3,860

5

3

30

13

 

bcTids

26

292

21,921

3,859

5

3

25

13

 

bcFLX

23

223

33,433

17,560

29

19

1,131

77

all

bcTi

47

263

59,557

39,374

9

8

284

26

 

bcTids

23

263

54,751

38,094

12

9

394

33

  1. 1 bcFLX: barcoded FLX; bcTi: barcoded Titanium; bcTids: barcoded Titanium, down sampled to the same sequence depth as of bcFLX.
  2. 2 misassemblies
  3. 3 To quantify the assembly quality, penalties of 2 per misassembly and 1 per gap were given.