- Open Access
Lysolipid containing liposomes for transendothelial drug delivery
© Koklic and trancar; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 26 October 2011
- Accepted: 10 April 2012
- Published: 10 April 2012
Designing efficient 'vectors', to deliver therapeutics across endothelial barriers, in a controlled manner, remains one of the key goals of drug development. Recently, transcytosis of liposome encapsulated fluorescence marker calcein across a tight cell barrier was studied. The most efficient liposomes were found to be liposomes containing sufficient amount of alkyl phospholipid (APL) perifosine. APLs have similar structure as lysophosphatidyl choline (LPC), since APLs were synthesized as metabolically stable analogues of LPC, which increases endothelial permeability directly by inducing endothelial cell contraction, resulting in formation of gaps between endothelial cells. Since one of the unique properties of lysolipid, containing liposomal formulations is dynamic equilibrium of lysolipids, which are distributed among liposomes, micelles, and free form, such liposomes represent a reservoir of free lysolipids. On the other hand lysolipid containing liposomes also represent a reservoir of an encapsulated hydrophilic drug.
Presentation of the hypothesis
We hypothesize that free lysolipids, with highest concentration in vicinity of drug carrying liposomes, compromise endothelial integrity, primarily where concentrations of liposomes is the highest, in a similar manner as LPC, by formation of gaps between endothelial cells. Liposome encapsulated drug, which leaks from liposomes, due to liposome destabilization, caused by lysolipid depletion, can therefore be efficiently transported across the locally compromised endothelial barrier.
Testing the hypothesis
This hypothesis could be verified: by measuring binding of perifosine and other lysolipids to albumin and to lysophospholipid receptor (LPL-R) group; formation of stress fibers and subsequent cell contraction; activation of RhoA, and endothelial barrier dysfunction; by a synthesis of other LPC analogues with high critical micellar concentration and measuring their effect on transendothelial permeability in presence and absence of albumin.
Implications of the hypothesis
We propose that lysolipid containing liposomal formulations might be used as nonspecific transendothelial transport vector, since leakage of liposome encapsulated active drug occurs simultaneously with the release of the lysolipids. The concentration of the active drug is therefore expected to be the highest at the site of compromised endothelial barrier. By appropriate choice of the lysolipids an endothelial barrier would stay open only for a short time. Use of such liposomes would potentially maximize the delivery of the drug while limiting the passage of toxic substances and pathogens across the endothelial barrier. Combining lysolipid containing liposomes with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles or a targeting ligand might be required to efficiently localize drug delivery to a disease affected tissue and to avoid endothelial disruption over the entire body.
- Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- Liposomal Formulation
- Endothelial Barrier
- Critical Micellar Concentration
- Endothelial Permeability
Transendothelial delivery of hydrophilic drugs
Transcytosis holds a great potential for drug delivery across different endothelial barriers. Designing efficient 'vectors' (antibodies, protein carriers, viruses, nanoparticles) to deliver therapeutics, especially to the disease-affected brain tissue, in a controlled and non-invasive manner remains one of the key goals of drug development . Careful regulation of material exchange into and out of the brain is essential for the survival of neurons, which do not have a significant capacity to regenerate. This transport is regulated by the bloodbrain barrier (BBB), a dynamic interface between the blood and the brain formed by endothelial cells of the brain capillaries. However, it also very efficiently prevents the brain uptake of most therapeutically active compounds. Because of this, many diseases of central nervous system (CNS), such as Alzheimers disease, are undertreated. As a result, various strategies have been developed to improve the access of drugs to the brain parenchyma at therapeutically necessary concentrations to effectively manage diseases [2, 3]. Various drug delivery systems such as: liposomes, surfactant coated polymeric nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles , microspheres, nanogels, and bionanocapsules were tested for delivery of drugs to tumors of the CNS with different efficiancies . Even though transcytosis is often thought to be a selective process, endothelial cells of microvasculature move macromolecular cargo rather nonselectively within the fluid phase of the transport vesicle or by absorption to the vesicle membrane . Using vectors promoting transcytosis in such nonspecific manner can be more widely applied, especially in combination with nanoparticles or liposomes, into which large amounts of a drug can be incorporated . Liposomes seem to be a promising delivery system, which enable high cellular uptake and efficient transcytosis across cellular barriers including the BBB, as their composition can be easily adjusted according to the properties of targeted cells and tissues . It is expected that by a proper choice of liposome composition an efficient transcytosis of liposome entrapped drugs across the cellular barrier could be achieved . Since the transport of such liposomes throughout the body cannot be controlled, they could be in principle produced with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) or a targeting ligand in order to achieve their accumulation in desired tissue. SPIONs can be concentrated at a particular point of the body using external magnetic field .
Recent research on perifosine liposomal formulations and transcellular delivery
Perifosine liposomal formulations, micelles, and properties of lysolipids
Alkyl phospholipids are amphiphilic, lysolipid-like molecules and usually form micelles under physiological conditions. However different liposomal formulations of alkyl phospholipids were successfully prepared . This is possible only in the presence of lipids or other amphiphiles with complementary molecular shape. Usually cholesterol fulfills this role and enables the preparation of stable liposomal formulations from alkyl phospholipids and lipids of different chain length and head groups . Among different alkyl phospholipids, most investigations with liposomal formulations were performed with perifosine. One of key properties of perifosine containing liposomal formulations, which is unusual for liposomes composed of bilayer forming lipids, is presence of high amounts of micelles in liposomal samples [26, 27]. The content of micelles in perifosine liposomal formulations decreases with increasing cholesterol concentration, disappearing roughly at below 1:1 ratio of perifosine to cholesterol [26, 28], similarly as capacity of perifosine liposomal formulations for transendothelial delivery. Presence of micelles in perifosine liposomal formulations could be expected, taking into account lipid monolayer experiments, which showed that alkyl phospholipids, below the critical micellar concentration (CMC), insert progressively into lipid monolayers as monomers from the aqueous medium, but above CMC, not only monomers but also groups of monomers (micelles) are transferred into the monolayers . It was also shown that while alkyl phospholipid HePC is miscible with POPC, there is high affinity between HePC and sterols (ergosterol, and cholesterol) and that maximum condensation is reached at a ratio of HePC/sterol around 1:1 (mol/mol) . This kind of behavior is generally known as the condensing effect of cholesterol towards phospholipids [30, 31]. Micelles constitute a reservoir of monomers both for monomer insertion between condensed phospholipids and for groups of monomer insertion between fluid phospholipids. Since biological membranes are composed of dynamically condensed domains surrounded by fluid domains, it has been suggested that, above the CMC, alkyl phospholipids can insert into both kinds of phases: as monomers into the condensed phase and as a group of monomers into the fluid phase . This is also in agreement with fluorescence microspectroscopy data, which show that lipophilic phospholipid fluorescent probe NBD-PC, where 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl (NBD) is attached to a phosphatidylcholine phospholipid is immediately transferred into cells after addition of liposomes with higher than 1:1 ratio of perifosine to cholesterol, whereas liposomes with lower ratio do not interact with cells [26, 33]. With electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy it was similarly shown that hydrophilic spin probe encapsulated in liposomes with lower than 1:1 ratio of perifosine to cholesterol does not enter cells, whereas starts entering cells immediately after incubation when it is encapsulated in liposomes with higher than 1:1 ratio of perifosine to cholesterol . All of the above results can be explained with the existence of highly mobile phase of free and micellar phase of perifosine in liposomal formulations, which can interact with cells.
Lysolipids influence endothelial integrity
Lysophosphatidyl choline (LPC) is known to increase endothelial permeability directly , it appears to be a proinflamatory mediator, involved in disrupting endothelial barrier function resulting in inflammatory responses in vessel wall . Proinflammatory mediators bind endothelial cell surface receptors and activate signaling cues that induce endothelial cell contraction, resulting in formation of gaps between endothelial cells, which is a primary cause of increased endothelial permeability [37, 38]. Cell contraction is achieved by formation of stress fibers, bundles of polymerized actin and myosin filaments. These fibers were shown to be formed in response to many permeability increasing mediators by a monomeric GTPase, RhoA, which plays a central role in increasing endothelial permeability . When the choline group is removed from LPC, lysophosphatydic acid (LPA) is produced, which is also an intercellular signaling molecule influencing target cells by acting on a specific cell-surface receptor , activating the RhoA [40, 41], and induces prolonged endothelial barrier dysfunction accompanied by a reorganization of the F-actin cytoskeleton . This indicates that choline group doesnt play a significant role in inducing endothelial permeability. However, LPC is quickly metabolized by lysophospholypase and LPC-acyltransferase, and therefore cannot be efficiently used as a medical drug . Therefore alkylphospholipids (APL, also reffered to as alkyl-lysophospholipids) were synthesized by replacing the acyl group of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) with an alkyl group. We hypothesize that perifosine, as an LPC analog, which also consists of an 18-carbon alkyl chain and a phosphate group is also capable of inducing endothelial permeability in a similar manner as LPC and LPA. It has been shown that perifosine retains some physiological effects of LPC, for example, both LPC [44, 45] and perifosine  increase cytosolic Ca2+.
The nonsignificant role of a helper lipid DOPE
Although a hexagonal phase promoting lipid dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) [47, 48], which is known to be capable of destabilizing endosomal membrane , was also used in liposomal formulations in combination with perifosine in order to facilitate transendothelial delivery of liposome encapsulated calcein, no benefit in transendothelial drug delivery could be attributed to DOPE. Increased transendothelial delivery was observed for liposomes containing both DOPE and perifosine as well as for liposomes containing only perifosine . This suggests that either perifosine influences destabilization of endosomal memebranes to a much greater extent than DOPE or that endocytosis with destabilization of endosomal membrane might not be the primary mode of transendothelial delivery.
Physiological conditions - the role of albumin
Designing an efficient transendothelial drug delivery vector, one has to take into account the role of plasma albumin. As it was shown by Huang et al.  that, extracellular application of LPC, which exceeded the binding capacity of albumin, activated RhoA and impaired endothelial integrity. The presence of albumin in the medium has the effect of increasing the CMC value by binding lipid molecules and, hence, reducing the concentration of free monomers in the medium . We assume that the role of liposomes is similar to the role of albumin, which acts as a reservoir, gradually releasing albumin bound molecules.
Physiological concentration of albumin ranges from 3.5 to 5g/dl , which corresponds to concentration approximately 500 to 750M. Long chain fatty acids, with acyl chains from 16 to 20 carbon atoms and up to 4 double bonds, bind to albumin at 2 strong and 4 weak binding sites . This results in 1 to 1.5mM of strong binding sites on albumin for fatty acid like molecules. Strong fatty acids binding sites of albumin are usually occupied, since free fatty acids (FFAs) are one of the most important metabolites transported by plasma albumin. Although the plasma FFA concentration is quite variable, the molar ratio of FFA to albumin in the plasma is usually in the range from 0.5 to 2, rarely exceeding 3 . Albumin inhibits cytotoxic activity of lysophosphatidyl choline (LPC) by direct binding of LPC . Extracellular application of LPC, which exceeds the binding capacity of albumin, was capable of impairing endothelial barrier function . Under physiological conditions albumin probably binds most of LPC, since its plasma concentration in normal men was found to be around 130M . Since perifosine liposomal formulations contain perifosine micelles in equilibrium with free perifosine, which exhibits critical micellar concentration (CMC) around 0.5mM (unpublished data), we expect that significant amount of perifosine remains unbound under physiological conditions and might be capable of compromising endothelial integrity.
In this article we propose underlying molecular mechanism, which should be taken into account in designing lysolipid containing liposomes as efficient transendothelial delivery vectors in general.
Just as any other liposomal formulations they can be used as carriers of encapsulated hydrophilic drugs as well as lipophilic compounds;
They can release lysolipids in a controlled manner by varying lipid composition of liposomal formulation. The highest concentration of released lysolipids, which can compromise endothelial integrity, is therefore always in vicinity of liposomes with encapsulated active drug;
Leakage of liposome encapsulated drug, due to liposome destabilization, which is caused by lysolipid depletion, is greatest at the site of interaction of free lysolipids with endothelial barrier;
Incorporation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in lysolipid containing liposomes could help in achieving high concentration of the liposomes at a particular point of the body using external magnetic field;
Since lysolipid containing liposomes are thermosensitive, the release of the liposome contents can be further accelerated by heating the local tissue.
Free lysolipids from liposomal formulations might also induce transendothelial transport in viv o in a similar way as in serum free conditions, provided that free perifosine concentration is high enough to saturate binding sites on albumin.
Binding of perifosine and other lysolipids to lysophospholipid receptor (LPL-R) group;
Formation of stress fibers and subsequent cell contraction;
Possible activation of RhoA, and endothelial barrier dysfunction by measuring transendothelial resistance (TEER), before, during, and after the incubation of liposomal formulations with endothelial cell layer;
Leakage of liposome contents with respect to lysolipid depletion from liposomes as a function of other lipid components of liposomal formulation.
Influence of free lysolipids in presence of albumin, at higher or lower than albumin concentrations, on endothelial permeability;
Binding constant and number of binding sites for the lysolipid binding to albumin in comparison to LPC binding;
Extent of transendothelial delivery of liposome encapsulated marker by liposomal formulations made of lysolipids with different CMCs in comparison to perifosine and LPC, in presence and absence of albumin;
Critical micellar concentration (CMC) of perifosine as compared to other lysolipids and whether transendothelial delivery of liposome encapsulated marker depends on CMC of a lipid used as a component of the liposomal formulation;
Appearance of pathogens at the basolateral side.
If the hypothesis were true, lysolipid containing liposomal formulations might be used as endothelial transport vector, where free lysolipids, as a component of liposomal formulation, would locally compromise endothelial integrity in a similar manner as lysophosphatidyl choline, thus increasing the amount of delivered therapeutics into a diseased tissue.
This work was supported in part by Slovenian Research Agency Program P1-0060 Experimental Biophysics of Complex Systems, and in part by Center of Excellence Namaste.
TK contributed to conception and design of the hypothesis, interpretation of previously published data, and has been involved in drafting the manuscript. JS gave the final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We gratefully acknowledge the help of dr. Marjeta entjurc, from the Condensed Matter Physics Department (Joef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia) and Dr. Reiner Zeisig, from EPO GmbH Berlin-Buch, Germany, for critically reading the manuscript and for helpful and critical discussions, dr. Janez Mravljak for helpful discusions about molecular structures and properties of lysolipids and for preparation of molecular structure images, and to Marjana Nemec for providing preliminary data about perifosine critical micellar concetration.
This work was supported in part by Slovenian Research Agency Program P1-0060 Experimental Biophysics of Complex Systems, and in part by Center of Excellence Namaste.
- Karkan D, Pfeifer C, Vitalis TZ, Arthur G, Ujiie M, Chen Q, Tsai S, Koliatis G, Gabathuler R, Jefferies WA: A unique carrier for delivery of therapeutic compounds beyond the bloodbrain barrier. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e2469-10.1371/journal.pone.0002469.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gabathuler R: Bloodbrain barrier transport of drugs for the treatment of brain diseases. CNS Neurol Disorders Drug Targets. 2009, 8: 195-204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gabathuler R: Approaches to transport therapeutic drugs across the bloodbrain barrier to treat brain diseases. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 37: 48-57. 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jayagopal A, Sussman EM, Shastri VP: Functionalized solid lipid nanoparticles for transendothelial delivery. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience. 2008, 7: 28-34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tiwari SB, Amiji MM: A Review of Nanocarrier-Based CNS Delivery Systems. Curr Drug Del. 2006, 3: 219-232. 10.2174/156720106776359230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orthmann A, Zeisig R, Koklic T, entjurc M, Wiesner B, Lemm M, Fichtner I: Impact of Membrane Properties on Uptake and Transcytosis of Colloidal Nanocarriers across an Epithelial Cell Barrier Model. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99: 2423-2433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeisig R, Koklic T, Wiesner B, Fichtner I, Sentjurc M: Increase in fluidity in the membrane of MT3 breast cancer cells correlates with enhanced cell adhesion in vitro and increased lung metastasis in NOD/SCID mice. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 459: 98-106. 10.1016/j.abb.2006.09.030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patel MM, Goyal BR, Bhadada SV, Bhatt JS, Amin AF: Getting into the Brain: Approaches to Enhance Brain Drug Delivery. CNS Drugs. 2009, 23: 35-58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tuma PL, Hubbard AL: Transcytosis: crossing cellular barriers. Physiol. Rev. 2003, 83: 871-932.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Begley DJ: Delivery of therapeutic agents to the central nervous system: the problems and the possibilities. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 104: 29-45. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.08.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cornford EM, Cornford ME: Drug delivery to the brain New systems for delivery of drugs to the brain in neurological disease. Lancet. 2002, 1: 306-315. 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00136-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tartaj P, del Morales MAP, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, OT Gonz lez-Carre, Serna CJ: The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2003, 36: R182-R197. 10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Navarro C, Gonzlez-lvarez I, Gonzlez-lvarez M, Manku M, Merino V, Casab VG, Bermejo M: Influence of polyunsaturated fatty acids on Cortisol transport through MDCK and MDCK-MDR1 cells as bloodbrain barrier in vitro model. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 42: 290-299. 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.12.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hilgard P, Klenner T, Stekar J, Unger C: Alkylphosphocholines: a new class of membrane-active anticancer agents. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1993, 32: 90-95. 10.1007/BF00685608.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fichtner I, Zeisig R, Naundorf H, Jungmann S, Arndt D, Asongwe G, Double JA, Bibby MC: Antineoplastic activity of alkylphosphocholines (APC) in human breast carcinomas in vivo and in vitro; use of liposomes. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 1994, 32: 269-279. 10.1007/BF00666004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Blitterswijk WJ, van der Meer BW, Hilkmann H: Quantitative contributions of cholesterol and the individual classes of phospholipids and their degree of fatty acyl (un)saturation to membrane fluidity measured by fluorescence polarization. Physiol. Rev. 1987, 26: 1746-1756.Google Scholar
- Unger C, Peukert M, Sindermann H, Hilgard P, Nagel G, Eibl H: Hexadecylphosphocholine in the topical treatment of skin metastases in breast cancer patients. Cancer Treat. Rev. 1990, 17: 243-246. 10.1016/0305-7372(90)90054-J.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Blitterswijk WJ, Verheij M: Anticancer alkylphospholipids: mechanisms of action, cellular sensitivity and resistance, and clinical prospects. Curr Pharm Design. 2008, 14: 2061-2074. 10.2174/138161208785294636.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeisig R, Arndt D, Stahn R, Fichtner I: Physical properties and pharmacological activity in vitro and in vivo of optimised liposomes prepared from a new cancerostatic alkylphospholipid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998, 1414: 238-248. 10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00171-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yatvin MB, Weinstein JN, Dennis WH, Blumenthal R: Design of liposomes for enhanced local release of drugs by hyperthermia. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1978, 202: 1290-1293. 10.1126/science.364652.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mills JK, Needham D: Lysolipid incorporation in dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer membranes enhances the ion permeability and drug release rates at the membrane phase transition. BBA. 2005, 1716: 77-96. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.08.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arndt D, Zeisig R, Bechtel D, Fichtner I: Liposomal bleomycin: increased therapeutic activity and decreased pulmonary toxicity in mice. Drug Deliv. 2001, 8: 1-7. 10.1080/107175401300002685.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koklic T, Sentjurc M, Zeisig R: The influence of cholesterol and charge on the membrane domains of alkylphospholipid liposomes as studied by EPR. J. Liposome Res. 2002, 12: 335-352. 10.1081/LPR-120016198.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeisig R, Arndt D, Stahn R, Fichtner I: Physical properties and pharmacological activity in vitro and in vivo of optimised liposomes prepared from a new cancerostatic alkylphospholipid. BBA. 1998, 1414: 238-248. 10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00171-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeisig R, Stahn R, Teppke AD, Arndt D: Cancerostatic octadecylpiperidinoylphosphate liposomes: effect of composition on uptake by and toxicity to J774 mouse macrophage cells and MT1 breast cancer cells in vitro. Anticancer Drug Des. 2001, 16: 19-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koklic T, Sentjurc M, Zeisig R: Determination of the amount of micelles in alkylphospholipid liposome formulations with electron paramagnetic resonance method. J. Liposome Res. 2011, 21: 1-8. 10.3109/08982101003596133.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeisig R, Mu K, Maurer N, Arndt D, Fahr A: The Composition-Dependent Presence of Free ( Micellar ) Alkylphospholipid in Liposomal Formulations of Octadecyl-1, 1-dimethyl-piperidino-4-yl-phosphate Affects its Cytotoxic Activity in vitro. J. Membr. Biol. 2001, 182: 61-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koklic T, Podlipec R, Mravljak J, Sentjurc M, Zeisig R: Interaction of alkylphospholipid formulations with breast cancer cells in the context of anticancer drug development. Breast Cancer - Focusing Tumor Microenvironment, Stem cells and Metastasis. Edited by: Gunduz E. 2011, InTech, , 4Google Scholar
- Rakotomanga M, Loiseau PM, Saint-Pierre-Chazalet M: Hexadecylphosphocholine interaction with lipid monolayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004, 1661: 212-218. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.01.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chapman D, Owens NF, Phillips MC, Walker DA: Mixed monolayers of phospholipids and cholesterol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1969, 183: 458-465. 10.1016/0005-2736(69)90160-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghosh D, Tinoco J: Monolayer interactions of individual lecithins with natural sterols. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1972, 266: 41-49. 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90117-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rakotomanga M, Saint-Pierre-Chazalet M, Loiseau PM: Alteration of fatty acid and sterol metabolism in miltefosine-resistant Leishmania donovani promastigotes and consequences for drug-membrane interactions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 2677-2686. 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2677-2686.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arsov Z, Urbani I, Garvas M, Biglino D, Ljubeti A, Kokli T, Strancar J: Fluorescence microspectroscopy as a tool to study mechanism of nanoparticles delivery into living cancer cells. Biomedical optics express. 2011, 2: 2083-2095. 10.1364/BOE.2.002083.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koklic T, Zeisig R, Sentjurc M: Interaction of alkylphospholipid liposomes with MT-3 breast-cancer cells depends critically on cholesterol concentration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008, 1778: 2682-2689. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.08.024.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang F, Subbaiah PV, Holian O, Zhang J, Johnson A, Gertzberg N, Lum H: Lysophosphatidylcholine increases endothelial permeability: role of PKCalpha and RhoA cross talk. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005, 289: L176-L185. 10.1152/ajplung.00003.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mehta D: Lysophosphatidylcholine: an enigmatic lysolipid. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005, 289: L174-L175. 10.1152/ajplung.00165.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dudek SM, Garcia JGN: Cytoskeletal regulation of pulmonary vascular permeability. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 91: 1487-1500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lum H, Malik AB: Regulation of vascular endothelial barrier function. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 1994, 267: L223-L241.Google Scholar
- Moolenaar WH: LPA: a novel lipid mediator with diverse biological actions. Trends Cell Biol. 1994, 4: 213-219. 10.1016/0962-8924(94)90144-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moolenaar WH: Lysophosphatidic Acid, a Multifunctional Phospholipid Messenger. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270: 12949-12952.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spiegel S, Merrill A: Sphingolipid metabolism and cell growth regulation. FASEB J. 1996, 10: 1388-1397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amerongen GP VN, Vermeer MA, van Hinsbergh VWM: Role of RhoA and Rho Kinase in Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000, 20: e127-e133. 10.1161/01.ATV.20.12.e127.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Houlihan WJ, Lohmeyer M, Workman P, Cheon SH: Phospholipid antitumor agents. Med. Res. Rev. 1995, 15: 157-223. 10.1002/med.2610150302.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yokoyama K, Ishibashi T, Ohkawara H, Kimura J, Matsuoka I, Sakamoto T, Nagata K, Sugimoto K, Sakurada S, Maruyama Y: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors suppress intracellular calcium mobilization and membrane current induced by lysophosphatidylcholine in endothelial cells. Circulation. 2002, 105: 962-967. 10.1161/hc0802.104457.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyer ZU Heringdorf D, Jakobs KH: Lysophospholipid receptors: signalling, pharmacology and regulation by lysophospholipid metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007, 1768: 923-940. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.09.026.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergmann J, Junghahn I, Brachwitz H, Langen P: Multiple effects of antitumor alkyl-lysophospholipid analogs on the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration in a normal and a breast cancer cell line. Anticancer Res. 1994, 14: 1549-1556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellens H, Bentz J, Szoka FC: Destabilization of phosphatidylethanolamine liposomes at the hexagonal phase transition temperature. Biochemistry. 1986, 25: 285-294. 10.1021/bi00350a001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marrink S-J, Mark AE: Molecular view of hexagonal phase formation in phospholipid membranes. Biophys. J. 2004, 87: 3894-3900. 10.1529/biophysj.104.048710.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zuhorn IS, Bakowsky U, Polushkin E, Visser WH, Stuart MC A, Engberts JBFN, Hoekstra D: Nonbilayer phase of lipoplex-membrane mixture determines endosomal escape of genetic cargo and transfection efficiency. Mol. Ther. 2005, 11: 801-810. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.12.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hafez IM, Maurer N, Cullis PR: On the mechanism whereby cationic lipids promote intracellular delivery of polynucleic acids. Gene Ther. 2001, 8: 1188-1196. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301506.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- El Ouahabi A, Thiry M, Pector V, Fuks R, Ruysschaert JM, Vandenbranden M: The role of endosome destabilizing activity in the gene transfer process mediated by cationic lipids. FEBS Lett. 1997, 414: 187-192. 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00973-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim Y-L, Im Y-J, Ha N-C, Im D-S: Albumin inhibits cytotoxic activity of lysophosphatidylcholine by direct binding. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2007, 83: 130-138. 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2006.10.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Busher JT: Serum Albumin and Globulin. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. Edited by: Walker H, Hall W, Hurst J. 1990, Butterworths, Boston, 3Google Scholar
- Peters TJ: All About Albumin: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Medical Applications. 1996, Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Spector AA, Santos EC, Ashbrook JD, Fletcher JE: Influence of free fatty acid concentration on drug binding to plasma albumin. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1973, 226: 247-258. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb20486.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sasagawa T, Okita M, Murakami J, Kato T, Watanabe A: Abnormal serum lysophospholipids in multiple myeloma patients. Lipids. 1999, 34: 17-21. 10.1007/s11745-999-332-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.