Table 1 Characteristics of the sample
From: From anonymity to “open doors”: IRB responses to tensions with researchers
Total | % (N = 46) | |
|---|---|---|
Type of IRB Staff | ||
Chairs/Co-Chairs | 28 | 60.87% |
Directors | 1 | 2.17% |
Administrators | 10 | 21.74% |
Members | 7 | 15.22% |
Gender | ||
Male | 27 | 58.70% |
Female | 19 | 41.30% |
Institution Rank | ||
1–50 | 13 | 28.26% |
51–100 | 13 | 28.26% |
101–150 | 7 | 15.22% |
151–200 | 1 | 2.17% |
201–250 | 12 | 26.09% |
State vs. Private | ||
State | 19 | 41.30% |
Private | 27 | 58.70% |
Region | ||
Northeast | 21 | 45.65% |
Midwest | 6 | 13.04% |
West | 13 | 28.26% |
South | 6 | 13.04% |
Total # of Institutions Represented | 34 | |