Skip to main content

Table 3 Responses to the weekend training session among nursing and physician course participants

From: Creating a gold medal Olympic and Paralympics health care team: a satisfaction survey of the mobile medical unit/polyclinic team training for the Vancouver 2010 winter games

  

Average response*

Average responses by clinical role

 

No.

Questions

All participants

Nurses and RT’s§ n = 21 (SD)

Physicians n = 22 (SD)

P value

1

Training valuable for experiences during the games

1.43 (0.63)

1.43 (0.75)

1.43 (0.51)

0.520

2

Training increased comfort and familiarity in work environment

1.48 (0.50)

1.43 (0.51)

1.54 (0.51)

0.547

3

Preparation for subsequent practice during the games

1.56 (0.55)

1.52 (0.60)

1.60 (0.50)

0.437

4

MMU ’walk through’ provided situational awareness

1.27 (0.59)

1.24 (0.43)

1.32 (0.72)

1.000

5

MMU ’walk through’ increase anxiety

4.02 (1.01)

3.9 (1.04)

4.13 (0.99)

0.455

6

Discussion seminar on medical liability

1.78 (0.69)

1.67 (0.73)

1.90 (0.64)

0.356

7

Discussion on care management of elite athletes

1.63 (0.80)

1.48 (0.60)

1.80 (0.95)

0.288

8

MMU ’walk through’: understanding role and procedures

1.46 (0.67)

1.57 (0.81)

1.36 (0.49)

0.809

9

MMU ’walk through’: movement of simulated patient

1.45 (0.63)

1.50 (0.69)

1.41 (0.59)

0.896

10

MMU ’walk through’: experience in physical layout

1.38 (0.58)

1.40 (0.60)

1.36 (0.58)

1.000

11

Discussion on uniforms, security, and accommodation

1.95 (1.09)

1.86 (1.11)

2.04 (1.09)

0.793

12

Discussion on daily routines, shifts, and schedules

2.19 (1.05)

2.00 (1.05)

2.36 (1.05)

0.334

13

Discussion on protocols, safety, and infection control

1.72 (0.88)

1.67 (0.66)

1.77 (1.07)

0.199

14

General Q & A discussion

1.69 (0.75)

1.52 (0.68)

1.86 (0.79)

0.357

15

Discussion on mass casualty and emergency planning

1.72 (0.70)

1.57 (0.68)

1.86 (0.71)

0.408

16

Discussion on pandemic planning and H1N1

1.86 (0.83)

1.71 (0.64)

2.00 (0.97)

0.730

17

Discussion on blood administration protocols

1.76 (0.96)

1.42 (0.51)

2.09 (1.18)

0.109

18

Discussion on patient transfer protocols

1.58 (0.76)

1.57 (0.51)

1.59 (0.96)

0.215

  1. § Respiratory Therapists, *Response scoring scale: 1 = very valuable, 2 = somewhat valuable, 3 = neutral, 4 = minimally valuable, 5 = not at all valuable.