Skip to main content

Table 5 Contingency table comparing MIP with MIP + source data for assessable segments above the knee demonstrating no significant difference in proportions

From: Impact of source data on the interpretation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower limbs

 

MIP and source data

Total

MIP

Assessable

NSVC

Assessable

599

0

599

NSVC

6

3

9

Total

605

3

608

Difference in proportions (95% confidence intervals)

-0.010 (-0.010 to -0.001)

Two-tailed p (McNemar)

0.031