Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinocopathological features by gene mutations status compared with all-wild type in patients with AGC patients

From: Clinicopathological features and prognostic roles of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and NRAS mutations in advanced gastric cancer

 

All wild-type

KRAS codon 12/13

PIK3CA exon 9/20

NRAS codon12/13

KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PIK3CA

Mutant type

P-value

Mutant type

P–value

Mutant type

P-value

Number of patients

70

8

 

9

 

3

 

Median age

64.0

54.5

 

58.0

 

56.0

 

Gender (%)

       

Male

49 (70.0)

7 (87.5)

0.429

8 (88.9)

0.432

2 (87.5)

1.000

Female

21 (30.0)

1 (12.5)

 

1 (11.1)

 

1 (12.5)

 

ECOG PS (%)

       

0

38 (54.3)

3 (37.5)

0.466

4 (44.4)

0.727

1 (33.3)

0.476

1

32 (45.7)

5 (62.5)

 

5 (55.6)

 

2 (66.7)

 

Histological type (%)

       

Intestinal type

20 (28.6)

6 (75.0)

0.014

4 (44.4)

0.443

0 (0.0)

0.556

Diffuse type

50 (71.4)

2 (25.0)

 

5 (55.6)

 

3 (100.0)

 

No. of metastatic site (%)

       

1

54 (77.1)

8 (100.0)

0.195

8 (88.9)

0.675

3 (100.0)

1.000

2

16 (22.9)

0 (0.0)

 

1 (11.1)

 

0 (0.0)

 

Metastatic lesion (%)

       

Lymph node

41 (58.6)

3 (37.5)

0.348

6 (66.7)

0.717

2 (66.7)

0.851

Liver

14 (20.0)

3 (37.5)

 

3 (33.3)

 

1 (33.3)

 

Lung

2 (2.9)

1 (12.5)

 

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 

Peritoneal dissemination

18 (25.7)

1 (12.5)

 

1 (11.1)

 

0 (0.0)

 

Other

3 (4.3)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
  1. Abbreviations: ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. We described the clinical data of 90 patients, and we excluded the patients whose tumor tissues had no gene mutations but at least one gene could not be evaluated.