Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between village-level coverage in March 2012 and awareness of or participation in mobilisation activities in the 50 intervention villages

From: Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India

 

Regression coefficient*

95%CI

p-value*

Household awareness (n = 408)

   

Heard about sanitation campaign

0.203

(−0.306; 0.712)

0.43

Heard or participated in transect walk/mapping exercise

0.637

(−0.104; 1.379)

0.09

Heard or participated in wealth ranking exercise

1.530

(−2.261; 5.321)

0.42

Heard of village water and sanitation committee

0.181

(−0.660; 0.428)

0.15

Heard of adolescent girls groups or kumari committees

0.233

(−0.051; 0.518)

0.11

Heard or seen school children rally

0.230

(−0.025; 0.482)

0.07

Seen wall paintings

0.171

(0.001; 0.341)

0.05

Village motivator visited their house in the past month

0.216

(−0.000; 0.431)

0.05

VWSC members awareness (n = 170)

   

VWSC members attended NGO training

0.001

(−0.181; 0.183)

0.99

≥ 5 VWSC meetings held since the start of the programme

0.178

(0.010; 0.346)

0.04

VWSC attended the last VWSC meeting

0.060

(−0.164; 0.284)

0.59

VWSC member ever conducted household visits

0.025

(−0.205; 0.254)

0.83

VWSC member conducted ≥ 5 household visits

0.058

(−0.156; 0.272)

0.59

  1. *Regression coefficients express increase in latrine coverage in percent with every additional percent increase in awareness of or participation in activities among respondents in a village and among VWSC members.