Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Identification of valid reference genes for microRNA expression studies in a hepatitis B virus replicating liver cell line

  • Kari Stougaard Jacobsen1, 2,
  • Kirstine Overgaard Nielsen1, 2,
  • Thilde Nordmann Winther1,
  • Dieter Glebe3,
  • Flemming Pociot2 and
  • Birthe Hogh1Email author
BMC Research Notes20169:38

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1848-2

Received: 15 September 2015

Accepted: 8 January 2016

Published: 22 January 2016

Abstract

Background

MicroRNAs are regulatory molecules and suggested as non-invasive biomarkers for molecular diagnostics and prognostics. Altered expression levels of specific microRNAs are associated with hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. We previously identified differentially expressed microRNAs with liver-specific target genes in plasma from children with chronic hepatitis B. To further understand the biological role of these microRNAs in the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B, we have used the human liver cell line HepG2, with and without HBV replication, after transfection of hepatitis B virus expression vectors. RT-qPCR is the preferred method for microRNA studies, and a careful normalisation strategy, verifying the optimal set of reference genes, is decisive for correctly evaluating microRNA expression levels. The aim of this study was to provide valid reference genes for the human HCC-derived cell line HepG2.

Results

A panel of 739 microRNAs was screened to identify the most stably expressed microRNAs, followed by a PubMed search identifying microRNAs previously used as reference genes. Sixteen candidate reference genes were validated by RT-qPCR. Reference gene stabilities were calculated first by standard deviations of ΔCt values and then by geNorm and NormFinder analyses, taking into account the amplification efficiency of each microRNA primer set. The optimal set of reference genes was verified by a target analysis using RT-qPCR on miR-215-5p.

Conclusion

We identified miR-24-3p, miR-151a-5p, and miR-425-5p as the most valid combination of reference genes for microRNA RT-qPCR studies in our hepatitis B virus replicating HepG2 cell model.

Keywords

Reference genesNormalisationmicroRNAHepatitis B virusRT-qPCR

Background

MicroRNAs are suggested as non-invasive biomarkers for molecular diagnostics and prognostics, and some microRNAs show promising results as therapeutic targets in human trials [13]. A single microRNA can have multiple downstream targets and affect a number of different networks and pathways [4, 5]. Even small changes in microRNA expression may therefore have implications for gene regulation in various physiological and pathophysiological states [1, 6].

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a world-wide problem and approximately 240 million people live with a chronic HBV infection. HBV is one of the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is responsible for the death of around 780,000 people each year [7].

MicroRNAs are thought to play an important role in early HBV infection, chronic HBV infection, and HBV-related cirrhosis and HCC [810]. Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in children is associated with a high risk of developing HCC over time [11, 12]. Current knowledge on the pathogenesis at the molecular level is, however, limited [13]. We previously identified a panel of differentially expressed microRNAs in plasma from children with CHB [14] and furthermore showed that a number of the identified microRNAs had liver-specific target genes [15]. Liver tissue samples are unavailable as the majority of children with CHB are asymptomatic. Instead we use an in vitro HBV-replicating liver cell model to investigate the biological role of microRNAs with a possible influence on the pathogenesis of CHB in children.

RT-qPCR is often the preferred method for microRNA expression studies because of its sensitivity, flexibility, wide dynamic range, accuracy, and high throughput [16, 17]. Correct normalisation of microRNA RT-qPCR data is important to avoid erroneous conclusions [18]. Currently, there is no standardised normalisation strategy for microRNA RT-qPCR expression studies [19]. The small nuclear RNA U6 is frequently used as a reference gene (RG) in such studies [20]. Another strategy that has achieved general acceptance in RT-qPCR studies is identification of valid RGs by computer software such as geNorm and NormFinder [21, 22].

The present study was conducted to identify suitable RGs for microRNA expression studies in a human HCC-derived cell line (HepG2 tet-on), with and without HBV replication, after transfection of HBV expression vectors. We performed a systematic evaluation and identified miR-24-3p, miR-151a-5p, and miR-425-5p as the most valid combination of RGs in our model system. Results were verified by assessment of miR-215-5p, which is known to have a role in the pathogenesis of HBV infection [23, 24].

Results and discussion

Identification of candidate reference genes

Experiments were performed in the human HCC-derived cell line HepG2 tet-on. HBV replication was introduced by a doxycycline-inducible vector containing the 3091 HBV genome [25].

We applied a human microRNA PCR panel (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) to identify a number of stably expressed microRNAs. The microRNA panel included 739 microRNAs, and according to the manufacturer it included microRNAs that are either (1) generally more highly expressed, (2) more likely to be differentially expressed in disease, or (3) more often cited in the literature. We investigated the overall expression at two different time points (48 and 72 h) in the control HepG2 tet-on cell line and the HBV-replicating cell line (DOXY) (See Additional file 1 Figure S1 for heatmap, and Additional file 2 Table S1 for raw CT values). We identified the presence of 137 microRNAs, using an exclusion value of CT ≥ 32. We then evaluated the overall stability of each microRNA by calculating the standard deviation (SD) for all samples. MicroRNAs with SD values below 0.2 (35 microRNAs in total) were further investigated in a PubMed search to identify the microRNAs previously used as RGs. On this basis, 13 microRNAs (miR-17-5p, -24-3p, -26b-5p, -93-5p, -103a-3p, -106a-5p, -130b-3p, -151a-5p, -191-5p, -221-3p, -425-5p, -940 and let-7d-5p) were selected as candidate RGs (Table 1). Three small nuclear non-coding RNAs (U6 snRNA, SNORD38B, and SNORD49A) that are often used as RGs in microRNA expression studies [20, 2628] were included to test for the importance of structural similarities, when choosing appropriate RGs. In total, 16 non-coding RNAs were subjected to further investigation.
Table 1

Candidate reference genes for microRNA normalisation

microRNA

Sequence

PubMed ID

miR-17-5p

CAAAGUGCUUACAGUGCAGGUAG

18375788

miR-24-3p

UGGCUCAGUUCAGCAGGAACAG

22074795

miR-26b-5p

UUCAAGUAAUUCAGGAUAGGU

18718003

miR-93-5p

CAAAGUGCUGUUCGUGCAGGUAG

22134529

18375788

miR-103a-3p

AGCAGCAUUGUACAGGGCUAUGA

22134529

21519184

18375788

miR-106a-5p

AAAAGUGCUUACAGUGCAGGUAG

18375788

22788411

miR-130b-3p

CAGUGCAAUGAUGAAAGGGCAU

20890088

miR-151a-5p

UCGAGGAGCUCACAGUCUAGU

22745731

miR-191-5p

CAACGGAAUCCCAAAAGCAGCUG

22134529

21519184

18375788

miR-221-3p

AGCUACAUUGUCUGCUGGGUUUC

21567136

miR-425-5p

AAUGACACGAUCACUCCCGUUGA

20429937

miR-940

AAGGCAGGGCCCCCGCUCCCC

24488924

let-7d-5p

AGAGGUAGUAGGUUGCAUAGUU

24223986

Individual RT-qPCR and amplification efficiency

The selected candidate RGs were analysed by RT-qPCR. MiR-103a-3p and miR-let-7d-5p were excluded from further analyses because of CT values > 32. Mean CT values ± SD are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Mean Ct values for the 16 candidate reference genes

microRNA

Raw Ct value (mean)

SD

miR-221-3p

27.11

0.64

let-7d-5p

32.60

0.99

miR-106a-5p

24.32

0.35

miR-103a-3p

38.52

0.79

miR-93-5p

25.15

0.27

miR-17-5p

29.86

0.32

miR-26b-5p

28.54

0.41

miR-130b-3p

29.82

0.40

miR-24-3p

25.58

0.26

miR-425-5p

27.89

0.31

miR-191-5p

26.93

0.32

miR-151a-5p

27.19

0.24

miR-940

30.84

0.30

U6 snRNA

23.78

1.56

SNORD38B

23.36

0.38

SNORD49B

22.91

0.38

Reference genes with CT values > 32 were excluded from further analyses

We evaluated the primer amplification efficiencies of the remaining 14 non-coding RNAs. The optimal primer efficiency is 2.0 corresponding to a doubling of the target in each cycle. In the present setup we used Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) primers [29] and obtained amplification efficiencies from 1.8 to 2.7 (efficiencies and R2 values are listed in Table 3). LNA primers have been shown to have low amplification efficiencies [30] but were used in this study to ensure high affinity, specificity, and stability with regards to the microRNAs of interest [17, 31]. Calculated primer efficiencies were used in both our geNorm and NormFinder analyses [32].
Table 3

PCR amplification efficiencies

 microRNA

Standard curve

E = 10−1/slope

Slope

R2

Primer efficiency

Efficiency (%)

miR-130b-3p

−3.829

0.996

1.825

82

miR-93-5p

−3.805

0.999

1.832

83

miR-221-3p

−3.765

0.996

1.843

84

miR-106a-5p

−3.746

0.999

1.849

85

miR-425-5p

−3.745

0.989

1.849

85

miR-191-5p

−3.688

0.988

1.867

87

miR-24-3p

−3.577

0.994

1.904

90

miR-151a-5p

−3.576

0.997

1.904

90

miR-940

−3.316

0.993

2.003

100

SNORD38B

−3.231

0.996

2.040

104

miR-26b-5p

−2.975

0.948

2.168

117

miR-17-5p

−2.884

0.933

2.222

122

SNORD49A

−2.836

0.991

2.252

125

U6 snRNA

−2.267

0.791

2.761

176

Stability analysis by ∆Ct, geNorm and NormFinder

Overall expression stability of our 14 candidate RGs was evaluated by calculating the SD of the ∆Ct values from samples taken over time (24–96 h) in the cell lines: HepG2 tet-on, DOXY, and its negative control containing the non-replicating HBV genome. Top three were miR-151a-5p, miR-24-3p and miR-93-5p with SD values < 0.3. geNorm selects the optimal number of RGs based on the calculation of a stability value (M) and a pairwise variation value (V). In our analysis, miR-93-5p and miR-151-3p were identified as the most stable RG pair (M = 0.15) (Fig. 1a). A pairwise variation analysis showed that two RGs should suffice (V = 0.06), but adding a third gene (miR-425-5p) would improve normalisation (V = 0.05) (Fig. 1b). Three is also the lowest number of RGs recommended for use in microRNA expression studies [33]. One microRNA, miR-940, had an M-value above the exclusion limit of 1.5 (M = 5.43), making it unsuitable as a RG (Fig. 1a). NormFinder identifies the best normalisation gene from a group of candidates by calculating a stability value for each candidate. Our analysis revealed miR-93-5p as the best RG, with a stability value of 0.04. The best combination of genes was miR-130b-3p and miR-24-3p, lowering the stability value to 0.025 (Table 4).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

geNorm analysis of candidate reference genes. a Ranking of reference genes according to the average expression stability M. A stepwise exclusion strategy identified miR-93-5p and miR-151a-5p as the most stable reference gene pair. b Determination of the optimal number of reference genes for normalisation, concluding that top three most stable reference genes would suffice for correct normalisation

Table 4

NormFinder results. Candidate reference genes ranked according to expression stability

Rank

Gene

Stability

1

miR-93-5p

0.040

2

miR-191-5p

0.076

3

miR-151a-5p

0.084

4

miR-425-5p

0.106

5

miR-24-3p

0.124

6

miR-130b-3p

0.134

7

miR-17-5p

0.141

8

SNORD38B

0.157

9

miR-940

0.167

10

SNORD49B

0.190

11

miR-106a-5p

0.213

12

miR-26b-5p

0.255

13

miR-221-3p

0.401

14

U6 snRNA

1.427

Best combination

miR-130b-3p/miR-24-3p

0.025

A top-five comparison between the three approaches examined above found miR-151a-5p, miR-93-5p, miR-24-3p, and miR-425-5p to be the best RGs. According to geNorm three RGs are sufficient for optimal normalisation. Taking the amplification efficiencies into account (Table 3), the best combination to use in the present model system is miR-151a-5p, miR-425-5p, and miR-24-3p (Fig. 2).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Venn diagram showing the top five candidates from the three different approaches (∆Ct, geNorm and NormFinder) and their overlap

It is worth noting that U6, which is often used as a RG in microRNA RT-qPCR studies, had the most deviated amplification efficiency (E = 2.761) and ranked last or second to last in the three analyses.

Validation of the cell model system

We make use of the human liver cell model HepG2 tet-on for our in vitro studies due to lack of primary tissue from asymptomatic children with CHB. We introduced a doxycycline-inducible vector containing the HBV genome and the transactivator controlling mature virus production. Two genes work independently of this transactivator: The S gene, coding for the three surface proteins present in the viral envelope, and the X gene found to have oncogenic properties [34]. These proteins are continuously expressed independently of doxycycline-induction.

To evaluate our model system we investigated the expression of the most abundant liver specific microRNA, miR-122. miR-122 has been found to inhibit the expression and replication of HBV, and it is found down-regulated upon HBV infection, possibly facilitating viral replication and persistence [3537]. We found the expression of miR-122-5p significantly decreased upon the insertion of the HBV plasmid independent of HBV replication [CT = 24 in the HepG2 tet-on cell line and CT = 34 in the cell lines containing the HBV genome with or without induction (p < 0.0001)]. This is in accordance with results from previous studies identifying the HBx protein as a negative regulator of miR-122 expression [37, 38], and the constitutive expression of the HBx protein in the transfected cell lines. This result supports the usage of this cell model system to investigate the biological role of microRNAs in HBV infection.

Validation of reference genes

To assess the reliability of our selected RGs, we performed a target analysis on miR-215-5p, previously found to be up-regulated in CHB in children and adults as well as in HBV-related HCC [14, 23, 24, 39]. We studied the expression of miR-215-5p in HepG2 cells with and without HBV replication by RT-qPCR after 48 h of doxycycline treatment, and we normalised using miR-24-3p, miR-151a-5p, and miR-425-5p. Fold change was calculated using the 2−∆∆Ct method [40]. We found a significant up-regulation of miR-215-5p in the DOXY cell line compared to the control HepG2 tet-on cell line (0.2 fold, p = 0.04). We also normalised against the commonly used RG U6 and found miR-215-5p to be up-regulated by 11.2 fold (p = 0.01). The raw CT values showed approximately 1 cycle between HepG2 tet-on and DOXY. U6 is thus not a robust RG in this model system. Several authors have expressed concern about the use of this specific spliceosomal RNA as RG in microRNA studies because of its variability in structure and abundance as well as its often high degree of variance across samples [19, 20, 41, 42]. Our study demonstrates the importance of correct normalisation in microRNA expression studies, where even small changes in expression can have a vast downstream effect [5]. Comparison across studies requires validated RGs to avoid analytical errors and contradictory results [16, 19].

Conclusion

We evaluated 16 small non-coding RNAs as possible RGs in a HBV-replicating liver cell line using ∆CT and the two software algorithms geNorm and NormFinder. We identified miR-24-3p, miR-151a-5p, and miR-425-5p as the most valid combination of RGs to use for microRNA studies in this HBV-replicating HepG2 cell system and confirmed their validity with miR-215-5p. This result establishes a solid foundation for further studies in this cell culture model.

Methods

Cell lines and cell culture

The HepG2 tet-on Advanced Cell Line was purchased from Clontech (California, USA), cultured in DMEM media with 2 % fetal calf serum (FCS), 1 % penicillin/streptomycin, and G418 (100 µg/ml) at 37° C with 5 % CO2. To produce an HBV-replicating cell line, we introduced a doxycycline-inducible vector that contained the transactivator and an HBV genome encoding for HBV genotype D (ayw3 serotype) [25, 43]. The transactivator controls the synthesis of the HBV pregenomic mRNA and thus expression of the Polymerase gene and the PreCore/Core gene, while the Surface proteins gene and the X gene are transcribed continuously using their individual promoters. HBV replication was activated by applying doxycycline (1 µg/ml) to the media.

Verification of viral replication

Media and cells were sampled at 7 time points at 12 h intervals (24–96 h). Media was changed following the 48 h sampling to ensure optimal growth conditions. All cell lines were tested for HBV replication prior to further analyses. HBsAg was measured from the media using an in-house sandwich ELISA [C20/2, sample, Anti-HBs-Biotin, Streptavidin-Peroxidase and substrate (OPD)] as previously described [44]. The cell lines transfected with the vector containing the HBV genome with and without doxycycline showed similar amounts of HBsAg in their media, corresponding to the design explained in the section above. HBV DNA was only measured in media from the HBV-replicating cell line (data not shown).

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from cell lines using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, with minor modifications (200 µL chloroform was added, and after samples were applied to RNeasy Mini spin columns all centrifugation steps were performed at room temperature (RT) at 13,000×g). Elution was performed once with 50 µL RNase-free water. RNA concentrations were determined and evaluated using the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophometer (Thermo Scientific Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), measuring the absorbance at 260 nm as well as the absorbance ratio 260/280 nm to check for proper RNA quality. RNA samples were stored at −80° C.

cDNA synthesis was performed using the Universal cDNA Synthesis Kit II (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and conducted on a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). 10 ng RNA was used for each cDNA synthesis, and blank samples with H2O as template were included. cDNA was stored at −20° C until further use.

Quantitative real-time PCR

microRNA PCR panels

microRNA expressions were analysed in the cell lines using human microRNA PCR Panels (Human Panel I and II V2.M) and miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT microRNA PCR system (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) as described previously [14]. To further narrow down the putative RG candidates, a PubMed search was performed on each candidate to identify the microRNAs that have previously been used as RGs in at least one publication.

Individual RT-qPCR

Quantification of microRNA expression levels were performed by RT-qPCR using the miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT microRNA PCR system and specific microRNA LNA™ PCR primer sets (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark). Specific microRNA target sequences are shown in Table 1. cDNA was diluted 80× and run in accordance with Exiqon’s instructions manual on a CFX384 Real-Time thermal cycler (Biorad, Hercules, California, USA). Each sample was run in duplicate, and negative controls with no-template and blanks as well as a spike-in, UniSp6, were assayed in each run.

Amplification efficiency

Amplification efficiency for each microRNA LNA™ PCR primer set was determined by standard curve analysis. Dilution series were made from a pool of cDNA including samples from all cell lines and all time points. Each sample was run in duplicate, and blank samples were included as negative controls. A CT cut-off value was set to 36 for all primer efficiency analyses. Standard curve analyses were performed in duplicate, and average amplification efficiencies were used for further analyses.

Analysis of RT-qPCR data

Expression stability of the testet RGs was analysed using two widely applied algorithms: geNorm [21] and NormFinder [22]. The geNorm algorithm calculates an M-value that represents a gene’s variation compared to other candidate genes. A stepwise exclusion strategy identifies the two most stable genes. A candidate RG with an M-value above 1.5 is not considered a suitable RG. geNorm also calculates a V-value that determines the optimal number of RGs for normalisation. Starting with the two most stably expressed genes, a third, fourth, fifth, etc. is added, illustrating the levels of variation in average reference gene stability. A V-score below 0.15 is adequate for normalisation. The NormFinder algorithm calculates a stability value. The gene with the lowest stability value is determined to be the most stable RG. NormFinder provides both the best stable RG as well as the best stable pair of RGs. This is done by taking the different subgroups into account, estimating the inter-group and intra-group variations across the samples, identifying potential co-regulation between the candidates in the different subgroups.

Statistics

All data is represented as raw data or as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 6 using the unpaired Student’s t test (two-tailed). p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Declarations

Author’s contributions

KSJ, KON, TNW, DG, FP, BH concieved and designed the study. DG provided the HepG2 cell lines. KSJ and KON performed the experiments. KSJ, KON analysed the data. KSJ, KON, TNW, FP, BH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The excellent technical assistance of Sigrun Broehl, and the bioinformatic analysis performed by Aashiq Hussain Mirza is gratefully acknowledged.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Paediatrics, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
(2)
Department of Paediatrics and Center for Non-Coding RNA in Technology and Health, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
(3)
Institute of Medical Virology, National Reference Center for Hepatitis B and D Viruses, German Center for Infection Research, Biomedical Research Center Seltersberg, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany

References

  1. Mohr AM, Mott JL. Overview of microRNA biology. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(1):3–11. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1397344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lan H, Lu H, Wang X, Jin H. MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers in cancer: opportunities and challenges. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:125094. doi:10.1155/2015/125094.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrese M, Eguchi A, Feldstein AE. Circulating microRNAs: emerging biomarkers of liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(1):43–54. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1397348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Avraham R, Yarden Y. Regulation of signalling by microRNAs. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40(1):26–30. doi:10.1042/bst20110623.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pritchard CC, Cheng HH, Tewari M. MicroRNA profiling: approaches and considerations. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(5):358–69. doi:10.1038/nrg3198.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li Y, Kowdley KV. MicroRNAs in common human diseases. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2012;10(5):246–53. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2012.07.005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO. Hepatitis B. World Health Organization fact sheet No. 204. 2015.Google Scholar
  8. Cullen BR. MicroRNAs as mediators of viral evasion of the immune system. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(3):205–10. doi:10.1038/ni.2537.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Thirion M, Ochiya T. Roles of microRNAs in the hepatitis B virus infection and related diseases. Viruses. 2013;5(11):2690–703. doi:10.3390/v5112690.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li C, Hu J, Hao J, Zhao B, Wu B, Sun L, et al. Competitive virus and host RNAs: the interplay of a hidden virus and host interaction. Protein Cell. 2014;5(5):348–56. doi:10.1007/s13238-014-0039-y.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Luo Z, Li L, Ruan B. Impact of the implementation of a vaccination strategy on hepatitis B virus infections in China over a 20-year period. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16(2):e82–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2011.10.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Paganelli M, Stephenne X, Sokal EM. Chronic hepatitis B in children and adolescents. J Hepatol. 2012;57(4):885–96. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Prendergast AJ, Klenerman P, Goulder PJ. The impact of differential antiviral immunity in children and adults. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(9):636–48. doi:10.1038/nri3277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Winther TN, Bang-Berthelsen CH, Heiberg IL, Pociot F, Hogh B. Differential Plasma MicroRNA Profiles in HBeAg Positive and HBeAg Negative Children with Chronic Hepatitis B. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e58236. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058236.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Winther TN, Jacobsen KS, Mirza AH, Heiberg IL, Bang-Berthelsen CH, Pociot F, et al. Circulating MicroRNAs in Plasma of Hepatitis B e Antigen Positive Children Reveal Liver-Specific Target Genes. Int J Hepatol. 2014;2014:791045. doi:10.1155/2014/791045.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun. 2005;6(4):279–84. doi:10.1038/sj.gene.6364190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt EA, Broyles D, Head T, Deo SK. MicroRNA Detection: current Technology and Research Strategies. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2015;. doi:10.1146/annurev-anchem-071114-040343.Google Scholar
  18. Matouskova P, Bartikova H, Bousova I, Hanusova V, Szotakova B, Skalova L. Reference genes for real-time PCR quantification of messenger RNAs and microRNAs in mouse model of obesity. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tang G, Shen X, Lv K, Wu Y, Bi J, Shen Q. Different normalization strategies might cause inconsistent variation in circulating microRNAs in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:617–24. doi:10.12659/msm.891028.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Peltier HJ, Latham GJ. Normalization of microRNA expression levels in quantitative RT-PCR assays: identification of suitable reference RNA targets in normal and cancerous human solid tissues. RNA. 2008;14(5):844–52. doi:10.1261/rna.939908.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3(7):34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004;64(15):5245–50. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang ZQ, Meng H, Wang N, Liang LN, Liu LN, Lu SM, et al. Serum microRNA 143 and microRNA 215 as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of chronic hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:135. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-9-135.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu F, You X, Chi X, Wang T, Ye L, Niu J, et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein mutant HBxDelta127 promotes proliferation of hepatoma cells through up-regulating miR-215 targeting PTPRT. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2014;444(2):128–34. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Junker M, Galle P, Schaller H. Expression and replication of the hepatitis B virus genome under foreign promoter control. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15(24):10117–32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jiang J, Lee EJ, Gusev Y, Schmittgen TD. Real-time expression profiling of microRNA precursors in human cancer cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(17):5394–403. doi:10.1093/nar/gki863.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres A, Torres K, Wdowiak P, Paszkowski T, Maciejewski R. Selection and validation of endogenous controls for microRNA expression studies in endometrioid endometrial cancer tissues. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(3):588–94. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chen X, Liang H, Guan D, Wang C, Hu X, Cui L, et al. A combination of Let-7d, Let-7 g and Let-7i serves as a stable reference for normalization of serum microRNAs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79652. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079652.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Roberts P. MicroRNA expression profiling on arrays enhaced with locked nucleic acids. Nat Methods. 2006.Google Scholar
  30. Balcells I, Cirera S, Busk PK. Specific and sensitive quantitative RT-PCR of miRNAs with DNA primers. BMC Biotechnol. 2011;11:70. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-11-70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mestdagh P, Hartmann N, Baeriswyl L, Andreasen D, Bernard N, Chen C, et al. Evaluation of quantitative miRNA expression platforms in the microRNA quality control (miRQC) study. Nat Methods. 2014;11(8):809–15. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson G, Nour AA, Nolan T, Huggett J, Bustin S. Minimum information necessary for quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1160:5–17. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0733-5_2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Glebe D, Bremer CM. The molecular virology of hepatitis B virus. Semin Liver Dis. 2013;33(2):103–12. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1345717.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Chen Y, Shen A, Rider PJ, Yu Y, Wu K, Mu Y, et al. A liver-specific microRNA binds to a highly conserved RNA sequence of hepatitis B virus and negatively regulates viral gene expression and replication. FASEB J. 2011;25(12):4511–21. doi:10.1096/fj.11-187781.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang S, Qiu L, Yan X, Jin W, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Loss of microRNA 122 expression in patients with hepatitis B enhances hepatitis B virus replication through cyclin G(1) -modulated P53 activity. Hepatology. 2012;55(3):730–41. doi:10.1002/hep.24809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng F, Xiao X, Jiang Y, Luo K, Tian Y, Peng M, et al. HBx down-regulated Gld2 plays a critical role in HBV-related dysregulation of miR-122. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e92998. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092998.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Song K, Han C, Zhang J, Lu D, Dash S, Feitelson M, et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-122 by PPARgamma and hepatitis B virus X protein in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2013. doi:10.1002/hep.26514.Google Scholar
  39. Gui J, Tian Y, Wen X, Zhang W, Zhang P, Gao J, et al. Serum microRNA characterization identifies miR-885-5p as a potential marker for detecting liver pathologies. Clin Sci. 2011;120(5):183–93. doi:10.1042/cs20100297.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Xiang M, Zeng Y, Yang R, Xu H, Chen Z, Zhong J, et al. U6 is not a suitable endogenous control for the quantification of circulating microRNAs. Biochem Biophysical Res Commun. 2014;454(1):210–4. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Chugh P, Dittmer DP. Potential pitfalls in microRNA profiling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2012;3(5):601–16. doi:10.1002/wrna.1120.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Drexler JF, Geipel A, Konig A, Corman VM, van Riel D, Leijten LM, et al. Bats carry pathogenic hepadnaviruses antigenically related to hepatitis B virus and capable of infecting human hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci of U S A. 2013;110(40):16151–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1308049110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Glebe D, Aliakbari M, Krass P, Knoop EV, Valerius KP, Gerlich WH. Pre-s1 antigen-dependent infection of Tupaia hepatocyte cultures with human hepatitis B virus. J Virol. 2003;77(17):9511–21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jacobsen et al. 2016

Advertisement