Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the associations between poor glycemic control using HbA1 and different covariates of study participants, JUSH Diabetic Clinic, 1 May 31 July, 2012
Variables | Patients with poor glycemic control level using HbA1 ≥ 7 % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
No (%) | Crude or (95 % CI) | Adjusted or (95 % CI) | |
Age | |||
15–30 | 17 (19.3) | 1 | 1 |
>30 upto 45 | 20 (22.7) | 1.82 (0.32–10.34) | 0.26 (0.04–1.58) |
>45 upto 60 | 35 (39.7) | 1.07 (0.21–5.55) | 0.18 (0.03–1.12) |
>60 upto 75 | 12 (13.6) | 0.87 (0.18–4.22) | 0.39 (0.05–3.12) |
>75 upto 90 | 4 (4.5) | 1.50 (0.25–8.97) | 0.51(0.03–8.21) |
Sex | |||
Male | 50 (56.8) | 1 | 1 |
Female | 38 (43.2) | 0.82(0.42–1.59) | 0.88 (0.38–2.03) |
Marital status | |||
Single | 9 (10.2) | 1 | 1.00 |
Married | 71 (80.7) | 1.06 (0.37–3.03) | 3.29 (0.51–21.11) |
Divorced | 1 (1.1) | 0.78 (0.04–14.75) | 1.53 (0.05–51.58) |
Widowed | 7 (7.9) | NA | NA |
Duration of DM in years | |||
<1 | 6 (6.8) | 1 | 1 |
1–5 | 48 (54.5) | 1.38 (0.38–4.93) | 2.01 (0.44–9.24) |
>5 upto 10 | 20 (22.7) | 0.88 (0.23–3.36) | 1.18 (0.24–5.88) |
>10 upto 15 | 11 (12.5) | 2.29 (0.44–11.92) | 5.04 (0.69–36.92) |
>15 upto 20 | 2 (2.3) | 1.67 (0.115–24.26) | 2.89 (0.154–54.22) |
>20 years | 1 (1.1) | 0.42 (0.03–6.06) | 0.28 (0.01–12.33) |
Educational status | |||
Illiterate | 31 (35.2) | 3.31 (0.92–11.85) | 3.73 (0.79–17.84) |
Grade 1–8 | 39 (44.3) | 2.23 (0.66–7.54) | 3.45 (0.78–15.29) |
Grade 9–12 | 13 (14.8) | 2.31 (0.57–9.41) | 3.89 (0.74–20.42) |
≥Diploma | 5 (5.7) | 1 | 1 |
BMI in kg/m2 | |||
<18.5 | 16 (18.2) | 1 | 1 |
18.5–24.9 | 48 (54.5) | 0.62 (0.23–1.66) | 0.72 (0.23–2.27) |
>24.9–30 | 20 (22.7) | 0.55 (0.18–1.65) | 0.65 (0.17–2.49) |
>30 | 4 (4.5) | 0.58 (0.10–3.33) | 0.56 (0.08–3.85) |
Current treatment format | |||
Injectables | 46 (52.3) | 1.057 (0.167–6.716) | 0.51 (0.06–4.01) |
Oral | 39 (44.3) | 0.897 (0.141–5.717) | 0.60 (0.08–4.84) |
Combination of both | 3 (3.4) | 1 | 1 |