Skip to main content

Advertisement

Erratum to: Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme

Article metrics

The original article was published in BMC Research Notes 2015 8:153

Erratum to: BMC Research Notes (2015) 8:153 DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1079-y

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. In both the Abstract and the Results section the number of HTA reports containing the name of the website, (n = 54) should have read (n = 83).

This also affects the data in Figure 3 (Fig. 1 here), where “Website name” should also have read 83 on the chart rather than 54. A correct version of Figure 3 can be seen below.

Fig. 1
figure1

Details reported about web searching using websites (2)

Reference

  1. 1.

    Briscoe S. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:153.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Simon Briscoe.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1079-y.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briscoe, S. Erratum to: Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme. BMC Res Notes 9, 169 (2016) doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1971-0

Download citation