Skip to main content

Table 3 Acceptability of voice-based ecological momentary assessment methods

From: Acceptability of smartphone text- and voice-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods among low income housing residents in New York City

 

Yes (% [n])

No (% [n])

p value

Age

  

.01

 Less than 25 years old

60.7 (17)

39.3 (11)

 

 25 to 44 years old

81.6 (31)

18.4 (7)

 

 45 years old and older

91.1 (41)

8.9 (4)

 

Gender

  

.09

 Male

72.3 (34)

27.7 (13)

 

 Female

85.5 (53)

14.5 (9)

 

Race/ethnicity

  

.91

 White/Caucasian

100.0 (1)

 

 Black/African American

79.7 (59)

20.3 (15)

 

 Hispanic/Latino

80.0 (4)

20.0 (1)

 

 Asian/Pacific Islander

100.0 (3)

 

 Multiracial/other

80.8 (21)

19.2 (5)

 

Educational attainment

  

.88

 Less than 12th grade

80.6 (25)

19.4 (6)

 

 High school or equivalent

79.5 (35)

20.5 (9)

 

 Some college

81.5 (22)

18.5 (5)

 

 Bachelor’s degree or higher

75.0 (6)

25.0 (2)

 

Household income

  

.26

 Less than $25,000

81.0 (64)

19.0 (15)

 

 $25,000–$49,999

80.0 (20)

20.0 (5)

 

 $50,000 or greater

66.7 (4)

33.3 (2)

 

Employment status

  

.00

 Working full time

94.1 (16)

5.9 (1)

 

 Working part time

77.3 (17)

22.7 (5)

 

 Not working

80.7 (46)

19.3 (11)

 

 Retired

100.0 (6)

 

 Student

28.6 (2)

71.4 (5)

 

Body mass index classification

  

.28

 Underweight

50.0 (1)

50.0 (1)

 

 Normal weight

71.0 (22)

29.0 (9)

 

 Overweight

83.9 (26)

16.1 (5)

 

 Obese

85.1 (40)

14.9 (7)

 

Blood pressure classification

  

.43

 Normal blood pressure

72.7 (24)

27.3 (24)

 

 Pre-hypertension

82.4 (28)

17.6 (6)

 

 Hypertension

84.1 (37)

15.9 (7)

 

Cell Phone ownership

  

.29

 Yes

81.4 (83)

18.6 (19)

 

 No

66.7 (6)

33.3 (3)

 

Smartphone ownership

  

.35

 Yes

84.2 (48)

15.8 (9)

 

 No

76.7 (33)

23.3 (10)