Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Serotyping and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Vibrio and Shigella isolates from diarrheal patients visiting a Tropical and Infectious Diseases Hospital in central Nepal

  • 1,
  • 2, 3Email author,
  • 4 and
  • 5
BMC Research Notes201710:626

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2967-0

  • Received: 24 October 2016
  • Accepted: 21 November 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Diarrheal diseases are the major infectious disease in developing countries like Nepal. Lack of proper sanitation and antimicrobial resistance gained by microbes have challenged to address diarrheal diseases in resource-limited countries. Early diagnosis of disease and proper antibiotic treatment can significantly reduce the disease burden. This study was designed to determine the recent antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Vibrio cholerae and Shigella spp. to assure the proper antibiotic treatment. Stool specimens were processed following microbiological protocol and identified by biochemical and serological tests recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute.

Results

Out of total 640 analyzed stool samples, 50 were culture positive, among them 29 were Shigella spp. (64.4%) and 21 were V. cholerae (46.6%). All V. cholerae strains belonged to the serogroup O1 and serovar Ogawa. Among the Shigella spp., Shigella flexneri 17 (59%) topped the list of serotype followed by Shigella sonnei 8 (28%), Shigella dysenteriae 3 (10%) and Shigella boydii 1 (3%) respectively. All the V. cholerae isolates (100%) were sensitive to cefotaxime while 71% were sensitive to tetracycline but 100 and 90.4% were resistance to co-trimoxazole and nalidixic acid respectively. Shigella isolates were mostly susceptible to cefotaxime (97%) while ciprofloxacin (48%) and ofloxacin (55%) were less effective drugs.

Conclusions

These results on the prevalence of enteropathogens and their antibiotic resistance pattern may help to guide accurate choice of therapy in clinical setting. Hence, development of evidence based National Guidelines for the treatment of diarrhea is needed.

Keywords

  • Diarrheal disease
  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • Serotype

Background

Enteric diseases are being cardinal cause of morbidity and mortality in the resource limited countries like Nepal which is considered as the second leading cause of death in children under 5 years and around 525,000 children are losing their life each year due to enteric diseases [1]. Outbreak of diarrheal diseases including cholera epidemics is being a cardinal health problem in Nepal since long time ago. Burden of diarrheal diseases is reported throughout the year but outbreaks are seen during and immediately after the rainy season of every year [2]. The incidence of diarrheal diseases in Nepal increases during the summer season with the high preponderance in July and August months; beginning with the monsoon rain in May. As being a communicable disease which transmits via contaminated water and food, diarrheal diseases become more active during the monsoon season [3, 4].

Shigella is one of the leading causes of bacterial diarrhea in Nepal and contains four species flexneri, sonnei, dysenteriae, and boydii. In Mid and Far Western parts of the country Shigella flexneri has been the predominant isolate with 43.07% [5]. The prevalence of Shigella species causing an acute diarrhea in children under 5 years of age in Kathmandu valley is 4.6% [6]. Similarly, cholera is a secretory diarrheal disease that causes excessive fluid secretion which can result from bacterial enterotoxin (cholera toxin) of Vibrio cholerae strains. More than 150 serogroups of V. cholerae have been confirmed but the toxigenic serogroup O1 of V. cholerae is the cardinal causative serogroup of several outbreaks since long time ago [7]. All the isolates of V. cholerae were serogroup O1 of the classical biotype where subtype was Ogawa [8]. During cholera outbreak in Far-Western part of Nepal in 2013, all the isolates were V. cholerae having prevalence of 47.06% [9].

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest challenge to the public health locally and globally and has gained particular concern in the developing world. Herein Nepal, inappropriate use of antibiotics is very common which creates an environment where drug-resistant microbes flourish very rapidly. Additionally, the resistance of enteric bacteria to antibiotics has been increasing very sharply both in developed and developing communities [10]. The rate of AMR in our health setting is alarming and the preparation for its future calamities is almost zero. AMR has seen even to new antimicrobial drugs and is very commonly observed in bacteria like V. cholerae, Shigella, Salmonella, and Staphylococcus aureus [11]. In context of Nepal, underuse, misuse and overuse of antibiotics without health care professional advice, availability of antibiotics even in local groceries, use of antibiotics in farm and field, sharing of antibiotics with family and friends are very common which accelerate the development of antimicrobial resistance [12]. Thus, the main objective of this study was to identify Shigella spp., V. cholerae and monitor the changing antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Nepal.

Methods

This study was carried out in Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital, from June 2014 to December 2014. A total of 650 stool samples were processed from the patients who had been consulted with the clinician were included as the study subject. The stool samples were transferred to microbiology laboratory and processed as soon as possible according to the standard laboratory methods. In this study, patients have remained in hospital for longer than 3 days and/or in prior antibiotic use were kept in exclusion criteria.

For the isolation of V. cholerae, a loopful of fresh watery stool was inoculated on alkaline peptone water (APW) (pH 8.6) in a volume of 1:10. In case of swab it was dipped into the alkaline peptone water tube directly and incubated aerobically for 6 h at 37 °C. After incubation, precaution was taken to avoid shaking of the enrichment culture which may disturb the growth at the surface of the broth while solid and semi-solid stool samples were directly inoculated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD) and MacConkey agar (MA) then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Similarly, after 6 h the APW inoculated samples were streaked on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose (TCBS) and MA then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After proper incubation period, the TCBS plates were observed for the presence of yellow button shaped sucrose fermenting colonies while XLD plates were observed for the pink red colonies of 1–2 mm diameter with no black center and late lactose fermenting colonies on MA. Then, the pathogenic organism was further sub-cultured on nutrient agar for isolation of pure colonies at 37 °C for 24 h and appropriate biochemical tests (catalase, oxidase, urease, sulfide indole motility, triple sugar iron, citrate) were performed [13]. The V. cholerae was confirmed as sucrose fermenting yellow colonies on TCBS, late lactose fermenting colonies on MA, oxidase positive, catalase positive, urease negative, glucose and sucrose fermentative, maltose non-fermentative, citrate positive, indole positive, methyl red negative, Voges–Proskauer negative, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) negative, and in triple sugar iron agar tube acid/acid with no gas production (identification of V. cholerae CDC, 2012). The pink colonies from XLD and late lactose fermenting colonies from MA were tested for urease production, citrate utilization, indole production, motility, acid and gas production with sugar utilization. Shigella spp. were confirmed based on biochemical results along with oxidase and urease negative tests (identification of Shigella spp. Public Health England, 2015). While serological identification was done for the Shigella spp. for the identification of specific species using the polyvalent antisera A–D (Shigella Antisera) and V. cholerae (polyvalent O1, Inaba, Ogawa and Hikojima type monovalent antisera) by slide agglutination method with the use of specific antisera manufactured by Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Japan. Slide agglutination was performed on a glass slide by emulsifying the growth in a small drop of physiological saline and mixed thoroughly by tilting back and forth for 30 s. Small drop of antiserum was added to the respective suspension. The suspension and antiserum were mixed well and tilted back and forth to observe for visible agglutination. One drop of physiological saline and the growth emulsion was used as a negative control and to observe for auto-agglutination (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Japan). Details of the serotyping by slide agglutination method is included in Additional file 1: Appendix S1.

Antibiotic susceptibility test of the isolated and identified strains was performed by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method; a standard dilution of the test isolate was prepared by matching it with 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards and was uniformly swabbed over the Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) medium. Then antibiotic discs (Hi-media, Mumbai, India): ampicillin (10 µg), cotrimoxazole (1.25 µg/23.5 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), and tetracycline (30 µg) were placed on the medium and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h according to the isolated organism. After incubation period the zone of inhibition were measured and results were interpreted as per the guidelines given by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) [14].

Results

From total of 650 stool samples processed, 50 samples were found to be positive for enteric bacterial pathogens of which 21 (3%) were V. cholerae and 29 (5%) were Shigella spp. where total positive case was 7.7% (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Distribution of the positive cases in total samples. From total of 650 stool samples analyzed, 50 samples were found to be positive for enteric bacterial pathogens of which 29 (5%) were Shigella spp. and 21 (3%) were Vibrio cholerae where total positive case was 7.7%

Serotyping results showed that all the strains of V. cholerae agglutinate polyvalent O1 antisera hence all V. cholerae belonged to serogroup O1 and serotype Ogawa while non of them were neither Inaba nor Hikojima serotype. Out of 29 Shigella species isolated, S. flexneri was the highest with 17 (59%), followed by Shigella sonnei 8 (28%), Shigella dysenteriae 3 (10%) where Shigella boydii was the least isolated with 1 (3%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Result of serotyping of isolated Shigella species

Shigella serogroup

Shigella species

Number of cases

Percentage %

Polyvalent A

Shigella dysenteriae

3

10

Polyvalent B

Shigella flexneri

17

59

Polyvalent C

Shigella boydii

1

3

Polyvalent D

Shigella sonnei

8

28

Among 650 samples, the highest positive cases of gastroenteritis was seen in ward patients (in-patients) of 82%, followed by out-patients with 18% and no positive cases was seen in patients living with human immuno deficiency virus (PLHIV) (Table 2). There was no significant difference in occurrence between gastroenteritis cases and type of the patients (P > 0.05). The patients of age group 15–30 years were mostly affected by both cholera (52%) and shigellosis (38%) (Fig. 2). Among 50 positive cases, 28 (56%) were isolated from male while 22 (44%) were isolated from female patients (Table 3) where there was no significant differences in between growth of the pathogen and gender of patients (P > 0.05).
Table 2

Patients wise distribution of gastroenteritis

Patient type

Result

Total

P value

Negative cases

Positive cases

Out patients

170

9 (18%)

179

0.12

In patients

414

41 (82%)

455

PLHIV

16

0 (0%)

16

Total

600

50

650

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Age wise distribution of gastroenteritis. The patients of age group 15–30 years were mostly affected by both cholera (52%) and shigellosis (38%)

Table 3

Gender wise distribution of gastroenteritis

Gender

Result

Total

P value

Negative

Positive

Male

274

28

302

0.15

Female

326

22

348

Total

600

50

650

The distribution of bacterial pathogens of gastroenteritis showed increment in rainy season and sharp decrement in winter. The peak value of cholera positive cases were seen in the month of August with a steady curve graph. The highest number of shigellosis was seen in November with a zig zag pattern of graph plot (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Month wise distribution of gastroenteritis from June 2014 to Dec 2014. The distribution of bacterial pathogens of gastroenteritis showed increment in rainy season and sharp decrement in winter. The peak value of cholera positive cases were seen in the month of August with a steady curve graph. The highest number of shigellosis was seen in November with a zig zag pattern of graph plot

All the isolated V. cholerae were found to be sensitive to cefotaxime (CTX), while 71% were sensitive and 29% were intermediately sensitive to tetracycline (TET). All the strains were completely resistant to cotrimoxazole (COT) and 90% were resistant to nalidixic acid (NA) (Table 4). Almost all the Shigella isolates in this study were susceptible to cefotaxime (97%) except one isolate which was found to be resistant to this drug. The isolated Shigella spp. were mostly found to be resistant to nalidixic acid (NA) (76%), ampicillin (AMP) (58%), and cotrimoxazole (55%). Ciprofloxacin (CIP) and ofloxacin (OF) which are used as a drug of choice were found to be 48 and 55% sensitive for Shigella spp. whereas resistance was 52 and 41% for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin respectively (Table 5).
Table 4

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Vibrio cholerae

Total positive cases

Antibiotics

Sensitive (%)

Intermediate (%)

Resistant (%)

 

Ampicillin

33

67

 

Cotrimoxazole

100

 

Nalidixic acid

10

90

21

Cefotaxime

100

Chloramphenicol

57

33

10

Ciprofloxacin

81

19

Tetracycline

71

29

Table 5

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Shigella spp.

Total positive cases

Antibiotics

Sensitive (%)

Intermediate (%)

Resistant (%)

 

Ampicillin

21

21

58

 

Cotrimoxazole

41

4

55

 

Nalidixic acid

17

7

76

29

Cefotaxime

97

3

Chloramphenicol

86

7

7

Ciprofloxacin

48

52

Ofloxacin

55

4

41

Statistical analysis

Chi square test was used to evaluate apparent differences for significance at 95% confidence level. Association of bacterial isolates with different variables were tested. Results were considered significant if P value was less than 0.05 and insignificant if more than 0.05. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 21.0) was used for the Chi square test.

Discussion

This study helps to understand the prevalence of enteric pathogens which is related to the public health concern in developing countries like Nepal and the need of antibiotic susceptibility assay for proper treatment and to control the emergence of resistant organisms.

In this study, 650 stool samples were processed for the isolation of V. cholerae and Shigella spp. and their antimicrobial sensitivity test was performed. Out of these, 50 positive cases were found, of which 21 cases were V. cholerae and 29 cases were Shigella spp., resulting in the total positive case of 7.7%. The causes of diarrhea in patients without positive bacterial culture might be parasitic infections, bacteria other than V. cholerae and Shigella spp., or foodborne infection and intoxication. The result had a similar prevalence with the study carried out by Ansari et al. [6]. Moreover, Kansakar et al. [15] have observed 15% culture positivity for bacterial enteropathogens from stool samples. Since, the prevalence of enteric disease varies from place to place while proper sanitation and hygiene of the people affect the occurrence of the disease. Bacterial pathogens could have been missed in the single stool sample processed so, second sample for stool culture should be made available to rule out the negative culture [16]. Also antibiotics are often consumed in Nepal without consulting the physicians, so administration of antibiotics prior to collection of stool samples may be one of the causes of 7.7% growth positivity.

The prevalence rate of cholera was 3.2% and is comparable to findings of Kansakar et al. [15] and Shah et al. [17]. The prevalence rate of shigellosis was 4.5% which is comparable to Shah et al. [17], Kansakar et al. [15] and Ansari et al. [6]. The highest number of positive cases were seen in the inpatients (hospitalized) or ward patients of 41 (82%) and 9 (18%) were from outpatients while no pathogenic bacteria were isolated from PLHIV patients. There was no statistical association between the type of patients and the gastroenteritis cases (P > 0.05). Out of 50 positive cases, 56% were male and 44% were female. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to say that there was no association between sex and the incidence of the disease (P > 0.05). In this study male patients were slightly more infected than female and age wise distribution of gastroenteritis cases showed that the cases were high in the age group 15–30 which is then followed by 30–45 and 60–75. There was no significant difference in occurrence of gastroenteritis cases and the age group (P > 0.05). The cause of high number of male patient with age group 15–30 may be due to the fact that the people of this age group are of working age group and the unhygienic food and water may have caused the infection of enteric diseases. Also highest number of cholera cases was observed during the rainy season and peak value was seen in August whereas shigellosis was seen almost all over the study period with highest number of cases in November (31%). In Nepal, rainy season starts from early June and lasts till September. The arrival of monsoon brings up the number of acute diarrheal diseases and cholera is a major diarrheal disease among them. During the study period all the isolated strains of Vibrio (21) were V. cholerae serogroup O1 serotype Ogawa. In recent years, Ogawa is predominant serotype of V. cholerae O1 during epidemics season. V. cholerae O1 serotype Ogawa and of biotype El Tor was the only serotype isolated during the outbreak of diarrhea in Kavre, Nepal in 2004 [18] and same serotype was isolated during 2008–2009 in a laboratory based surveillance study conducted by Karki et al. [19].

Among 29 Shigella spp. isolated, S. flexneri was the most predominant species with 17 (59%), then next were S. sonnei 8 (28%), S. dysenteriae 3 (10%) where S. boydii was the least isolated with 1 (3%). From this study, it is observed that S. flexneri was the common species responsible for causing dysentery followed by S. sonnei, S. dysenteriae and S. boydii. The similar finding was obtained in the study conducted by Kansakar et al. [15] in which S. flexneri was the most prevalent species (43.2%) but the second highest species was found S. dysentrieae (41.5%), followed by S. sonnei (7.6%) and S. boydii (7.6%).

In this study, antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) for the isolated and identified species was performed by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method for seven different antibiotic discs. The AST result shows that all the isolates of V. cholerae were found to be sensitive to cefotaxime (CTX), while 71% were sensitive and 29% were intermediately sensitive to tetracycline (TET). The isolated V. cholerae were found to be 100, 90, and 67% resistant to cotrimoxazole, nalidixic acid, and ampicillin in decreasing order. Similar findings were reported during V. cholerae O1 Ogawa strains isolated in 2008 in Kathmandu by Karki et al. [19]. This study showed that tetracycline may still be used as the drug of choice in case of severe cholera cases as none of the isolated showed resistant to this drug. But still the antibiotic susceptibility test should be performed prior to drug prescription which reduce the antibiotic resistance and disease burden.

Almost all the Shigella isolates in this study were susceptible to cefotaxime (97%) except one isolate which was found to be resistant to this drug. Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin which are used as a drug of choice were found to be 48 and 55% sensitive for this organism respectively whereas resistance was 52 and 41% for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin respectively. Ciprofloxacin is considered as the drug of choice for all kind of patients with bloody diarrhea but resistance has seen in many parts of the world. Cefotaxime and other third generation cephalosporins are currently in use for the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) species of Shigella while azithromycin is used as an alternative drug for the treatment of young adults. The prescription of these alternative drugs like ceftriaxone and azithromycin is restricted because of high rate of resistance in resource limited countries like Nepal. Generally alternative drugs are used when the isolated strains of Shigella are resistant to ciprofloxacin [20].

Conclusions

This study shows that the isolated bacterial enteric pathogens were V. cholerae O1 serovar Ogawa and Shigella spp. which includes S. flexneri, S. sonnie, S. dysenteriae, and S. boydii. Tetracycline and ciprofloxacin showed an adequate effectiveness against the isolated strains of V. cholerae. In this study the isolated Shigella spp. were mostly resistant to nalidixic acid followed by ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin while cefotaxime was found to be most effective drug. So, regular laboratory monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is becoming cardinal in order to choose the accurate drug and in designing evidence-based National Guidelines for the treatment of diarrheal patients in developing regions.

Abbreviations

AST: 

antibiotic susceptibility test

WHO: 

World Health Organization

NCID: 

National Center for Infectious Diseases

CDC: 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

USAID: 

United States Agency for International Development

CLSI: 

Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute

PLHIV: 

patients living with human immunodeficiency virus

APW: 

alkaline peptone water

GE: 

gastroenteritis

MHA: 

Mueller–Hinton agar

µg: 

micro gram

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

First authors: SM is primary author who designed the study methodology, performed laboratory investigations. BR is corresponding author who edited and revised the manuscript, helped to design the study and laboratory investigations. Second authors: AS and JA helped for design the study, analysis of results, proof reading of article and manage necessary arrangements during laboratory investigations. All authors approved the final manuscript before submission to the BMC Research Notes. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge STIDH director Dr. Kedar Prasad Sentury, senior laboratory staff of STIDH Mr. Ram Prasad Shreshtha for guiding the study and Hi Media Pvt. Ltd.—who provided antibiotic discs for the antimicrobial susceptibility tests. This work has been presented as poster at Second International Conference on Infectious Diseases and Nanomedicine 2015, December 15–18, 2015, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during this study are available in excel sheets which can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics and consent to participate

The ethical approval for this study was taken from the Institutional Ethical Review Board (IERB) of Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Diseases Hospital, Kathmandu before sample collection. The issued letter of IERB can be presented on request. Written consent was taken from all the patients in local language. This manuscript does not contain any individual human or animal data or tissue.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
St. Xavier’s College (Tribhuvan University), Maitighar, Kathmandu, Nepal
(2)
Kathmandu Research Institute for Biological Sciences (KRIBS), 19533, Lalitpur, Nepal
(3)
Department of Microbiology, National College (Tribhuvan University), Khusibu, Kathmandu, Nepal
(4)
Tri-Chandra Multiple College (Tribhuvan University), Ghantaghar, Kathmandu, Nepal
(5)
National Public Health Laboratory, Government of Nepal, Ministry of Health Services, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal

References

  1. World Health Organization. Fact sheets of diarrheal disease. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs330/en. Accessed July 2016.
  2. Sharma AK, Jha N, Ramachandran VG, Shariff M, Deb M, Kannan AT, Paudel IS, Yadav BK. Descriptive epidemiology of a gastroenteritis out break in Sunsari district, Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2002;41(143):383–7.Google Scholar
  3. Pandey BD, Thapa LB, Sherchand JB, Rimal N, Bhattarai A, Morita K. Etiology of diarrhoea among adult patients during the early monsoon period in Kathmandu, Nepal. Jpn J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;30(2):133–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Maharjan R, Lekhak B, Shrestha CD, Shrestha J. Detection of enteric bacterial pathogens (Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli O157) in childhood diarrhoeal cases. Sci World. 2007;5(5):23–6.Google Scholar
  5. Khan S, Singh P, Ansari M, Asthana A. Isolation of Shigella species and their resistance patterns to a panel of fifteen antibiotics in mid and far western region of Nepal. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014;4(1):30–4.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ansari S, Sherchand JB, Parajuli K, Mishra SK, Dahal RK, Shrestha S, Tandukar S, Pokhrel BM. Bacterial etiology of acute diarrhea in children under five years of age. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012;10(22):218–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of epidemic dysentery and cholera. Atlanta: World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Shrestha UT, Adhikari N, Maharjan R, Banjara MR, Rijal KR, Basnyat SR, Agrawal VP. Multidrug resistant Vibrio cholerae O1 from clinical and environmental samples in Kathmandu city. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0844-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhandari GP, Bhusal CL. Cholera outbreak in far-western region of Nepal. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2013;11(23):6–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, Jha P, Mills A, Musgrove P. Disease control priorities in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2006.Google Scholar
  11. Sack RB, Rahman M, Yunus M, Khan EH. Antimicrobial resistance in organisms causing diarrheal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(Suppl 1):S102–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Malla S, Dumre SP, Shakya G, Kansakar P, Rai B, Hossain A, Nair GB, Albert MJ, Sack D, Baker S, Rahman M. The challenges and successes of implementing a sustainable antimicrobial resistance surveillance programme in Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):269. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-269.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, Bailey SS. Diagnostic microbiology. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 778–81.Google Scholar
  14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, in twenty-third informational supplement. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013. CLSI Document M100–S23.Google Scholar
  15. Kansakar P, Baral P, Malla S, Ghimire GR. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of enteric bacterial pathogens isolated in Kathmandu, Nepal, during 2002–2004. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5(03):163–8. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.1016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphries RM, Linscott AJ. Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(1):3–31. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00073-14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Shah BK, Sharma S, Shakya G, Upadhyay BP. Cholera, Shigellosis and Salmonellosis incidence among the people of some Districts of Nepal. Nepal J Sci Technol. 2013;13(1):165–72. https://doi.org/10.3126/njst.v13i1.7455.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tamang MD, Sharma N, Makaju RK, Sarma AN, Koju R, Nepali N, Mishra SK. An outbreak of El Tor cholera in Kavre district, Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2005;3(2):138–42.Google Scholar
  19. Karki R, Bhatta DR, Malla S, Dumre SP. Cholera incidence among patients with diarrhea visiting National Public Health Laboratory, Nepal. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010;63(3):185–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the control of shigellosis, including epidemics due to Shigella dysenteriae type 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement