Skip to main content
  • Research note
  • Open access
  • Published:

Variability of phenolic and alkaloid content in different plant parts of Carissa edulis Vahl and Zanthoxylum chalybeum Engl.

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study was to investigate the relative abundance and effect of post-harvest treatment on total phenolics (TP) and total alkaloids in the leaves and bark of Carissa edulis and Zanthoxylum chalybeum, which would give an indication of the suitability of leaves as alternative sources of medicine in these plant species.

Results

Results indicated higher levels of total phenolics than total alkaloids in both of the species under both freezing and air drying conditions. While more alkaloids were found in leaves compared to bark, there was no difference in abundance of phenols between the plant parts of both species. Air drying preserved more TPs than freezing and the opposite was true for alkaloids. For sustainability, leaves are recommended as an alternative source of medicine instead of the preferred root or stem bark. However, the choice of whether to dry or freeze will depend on the specific compound of interest. Assessment of spatial variability of medicinal properties is highly recommended.

Introduction

Plant secondary metabolites represent a large range of molecules mainly involved in mediating plants with their environment. However, they are also known for their biological activity including analgesic, antimicrobial, stimulant, anti-cancer and even poison depending of the dose used [1,2,3]. For centuries, they have been effectively utilized for the prevention and treatment of multiple health conditions by almost every known culture [4, 5]. Through indigenous knowledge [4, 6,7,8], plants and plant parts that confer more efficacy have been identified. However, studies indicate that the nature and quantity of phyto-compounds differs among and within plant species and can be organ dependent within an individual [2, 9]. Quantitative or qualitative medicinal properties are also affected by post-harvesting processes [10].

Air drying is the traditional, low cost technique used for decontamination and long-term preservation [7, 11]. Dried extracts have high stability and are easier to handle, standardize, transport and store. Moreover, dried extracts allow the manufacture of solid dosage forms, like tablets and capsules [10]. However, during the drying process medicines are prone to oxidation, hydrolysis, microbial and other environmental degradation [12]. Freezing, on the other hand is assumed to properly preserve the medicinal compounds. Research has shown that these two post-harvest practices may differentially affect the quantity and quality of chemical and biological properties of medicinal compounds [13,14,15].

Carissa edulis Vahl and Zanthoxylum chalybeum Engl. are important medicinal species in Uganda for treatment of tuberculosis and associated diseases [7], sickle cells [16], malaria [17], oral/dental diseases [5] and many other ailments [8]. The bark of the roots or stem is the most important source of medicine [7, 16, 18, 19]. The chemical constituents of these species have been well characterized [20,21,22] and have shown alkaloids and phenols as the most important active constituents of pharmacological importance [23]. Alkaloids and phenolic compounds possess a wide range of pharmacological properties [24, 25]. Unfortunately, over harvesting of roots and bark severely impacts long term survival of affected species. An immediate intervention is to use leaves although the pertinent question is whether leaves can provide the required concentrations. Available studies have presented mixed results [2, 9]. Therefore, this study compared the phenols and alkaloids between the leaves and root or stem bark of C. edulis and Z. chalybeum under cold storage and air drying. Understanding the effect of storage may also give insights for quality enhancement, indirectly contributing to reduction of harvesting intensities.

Main text

Methods

Carissa edulis and Z. chalybeum have been selected for study based on their wide medicinal values and long term usage within the local communities of Uganda. Leaf and bark samples were collected from sites where the species naturally occur. Zanthoxylum chalybeum samples were collected from Budongo forest (1° 37′–2° 00′N, 31° 22′–31° 46′E) while C. edulis samples were collected from an open savannah (55° 14′N, 32° 50′E). 60 samples were collected from 30 individuals of each species. Each sample was subdivided and the fresh subsamples were sent to the National Chemotherapeutics Research Laboratories (NCRL) in Kampala, Uganda and immediately frozen at – 20 °C for 2 weeks before analysis. The other subsamples were air dried at room temperature for 2 weeks at the National Forestry Resources Research Institute (NaFORRI) in Kampala, Uganda. A voucher specimen of each species was collected for confirmation and is deposited at the NaFORRI Herbarium. Permission to collect samples from Budongo Forest was given by the National Forestry Authority.

Total phenolics were determined as garlic acid equivalent (mgGAE/g) using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent standard method [26] with some modifications. 10 ml of 50% methanol were added to 100 mg of well ground material and vortexed for 30 min. Sample extracts were kept at − 20 °C for 10 min and later centrifuged at 300 rpm for 10 min. 0.1 ml of each of collected the sample mixture was diluted with 0.4 ml distilled water, 0.25 ml of 2 N Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 1.25 ml of 20% sodium carbonate and vortexed for 15 min. The absorbance was measured at 725 nm using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 UV/VIS double beam spectrophotometer. Different concentrations of garlic acid (0.001, 0.002, 0.004, 0.008 mg/ml) were prepared in methanol for preparation of a standard curve with equation y = 0.023x − 0.006, R2 = 0.988. All determinations were analyzed in triplicate and result expressed in mg gallic acid equivalents per g dry weight. The Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and the gallic acid standard were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Alkaloids were estimated gravimetrically. Briefly, 200 ml of 10% acetic acid in ethanol was added to 5 g of the sample. The mixture was covered and allowed to stand for 4 h, then filtered and the extract concentrated to one-quarter of the original volume. Concentrated ammonium hydroxide is added drop wise in order to precipitate the alkaloids. A pre-weighed filter paper was used to filter off the precipitate which was then washed with 1% ammonium hydroxide solution. The filter paper containing the precipitate was dried in an oven at 60 °C for 30 min and then reweighed when cool until a constant weight was obtained and recorded. The weight of the alkaloid which was the difference between the clean and used filter paper was calculated and expressed as g/100 g. All the tests were conducted in triplicates. Means and variances were generated and analyzed using R-studio version 3.4.0 [27]. Graphs were generated in MS Excel.

Results

The two species were different in metabolite concentrations (F1, 133 = 1 8.6, p < 0). In both species, the mean quantity of total phenols (9.53 g/kg) was higher than of the alkaloids (1.28 g/kg, 95% CI − 1.13 to 0.52). The phenolic compounds were higher in Z. chalybeum (14.58 g/kg) than C. edulis (4.47 g/kg) (Fig. 1). The mean of total phenols in the leaves (9.54 g/kg) was not statistically different from that of the bark (9.51 g/kg, 95% CI − 0.39 to 0.28) (Fig. 1). After postharvest processing, the mean of total phenols of the dried material was higher (mean = 17.06 g/kg) than the frozen samples (mean = 1.99 g/kg).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Total alkaloid and phenolic content in leaves and bark of C. edulis and Z. chalybeum

Carissa edulis had more total alkaloids (mean = 1.72 g/kg) than Z. chalybeum (mean = 0.84 g/kg) (Fig. 1). In both species, the total alkaloids in the leaves (mean = 1.8261 g/kg) was higher than that of the bark (0.7367 g/kg) (F1, 70, t = 4.8 = 25.4). In the frozen samples, the alkaloids were more (Mean = 1.49 g/kg) than the dried samples (mean = 1.07 g//kg) (Fig. 2). There are also highly significant interactions between the species and the chemical compound (F1, 133 = 26.3, p < 0), species and storage (F1, 133 = 19.2, p < 0), compound and storage (F1, 133 = 52.4, p < 0) and between species and plant part (F1, 133 = 2.9, p < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Total alkaloids and phenols in the dried and frozen leaf and bark samples

Discussion

Phenolics, together with alkaloids, represent some of the main groups of plant secondary metabolites with health benefits [1, 3, 28], rendering them of putative practical interest in pharmacology and related fields. In the study, more total phenols than alkaloids in C. edulis and Z. chalybeum were detected. Phenolics are the most pronounced secondary metabolites found in [28]. Phenolic compounds are usually related to defense against biotic and abiotic stressors in plants [28,29,30], although they are also implicated in diverse biological activities such as symbiotic relationships (pollination, nitrogen fixation and seed dispersal) and participating in signalization and structural roles [28, 31]. On the other hand, alkaloids are found in about 20% of the plant species and only in young, actively growing tissues. Consequently their production and abundance are influenced by factors that affect growth of fresh plant tissues, such as light, soil nutrients and moisture, temperature etc. [32]. Generally, in most plants the common order of secondary metabolites with respect to abundance is phenolics > alkaloids > cyanogenic glycosides > tannins > flavonoids and saponins > terpenoids.

The abundance of total phenols was higher in Z. chalybeum than C. edulis and the opposite was true for alkaloids. Differences in metabolite abundance have been detected among and within species primarily due to genetic factors [30, 33, 34], environmental effects and their interaction [30, 35]. Changing growth conditions, especially nitrogen (N) availability, have been shown to affect phenolic concentrations in plant tissues. Specifically, N deficiency or limitation leads to phenolic accumulation in different plant parts [30, 31]. Comparatively higher levels of constitutive secondary metabolites observed in Z. chalybeum may also reflect the level of biotic and abiotic stresses it experiences [35]. These stresses are typical of natural forests where Z. chalybeum samples were collected. C. edulis was collected from a cattle grazing area, which receives constant N-enrichment from cattle droppings. Also, biotic stresses hence high investment in constitutive phenolics of C. edulis is greatly reduced by the long thorns that deter large herbivores and the constant cattle spray that reduces the pest incidences. Optimal defense theory predicts that individuals or tissues that are unlikely to be attacked by pests or pathogens should have low constitutive amounts of defense. The presence of more phenols in Z. chalybeum would also be supported by the resource availability hypothesis that predicts more secondary constitutive metabolites in slow-growing plant species [30, 36].

Even though roots and stem bark are exploited more than any other plant parts for medicinal purposes [18, 19], leaves of Z. chalybeum and C. edulis had equally or higher abundance of compounds. This is probably because leaves are more exposed to stressors than roots and the stem bark [35]. Research has demonstrated organ dependent accumulation of secondary metabolites [37] although no specific trend has been established [21, 38, 39]. Most intra-specific variations have been explained by the carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis that predicts leaves to be more responsive to C:N variations and over a very short time period [40]. Qualitative and quantitative variability due to plant ontogeny, physiological constraints and life-history strategy is also characteristic secondary metabolites [21, 29, 34, 39,40,41].

The effect of thermal exposure on bioactive compounds has been investigated in a number of plant species and most of these have indicated a degradation of alkaloids on exposure to heat and an enhancement of phenols [15, 18, 42,43,44]. Enhancement of phenolic compounds has been associated with thermal destruction of cell walls and subcellular compartments that results in increased levels of free phenolic compounds, the formation of novel compounds or the inactivation of deteriorative enzymes such as polyphenol oxidases [15]. Alkaloids on the other hand are not very stable. They undergo degradation or decomposition on exposure to air, light, moisture and heat or chemicals [41].

In summary, this study has shown that C. edulis and Z. chalybeum are rich in both total alkaloids and total phenols both in the leaves and the root/stem bark. Based on this observation, leaves are recommended as a satisfactory substitute for roots and bark as source of medicine. Leaf harvesting is less destructive for most of the medicinal plants since leaves are abundant, regenerate faster and harvesting doesn’t lead to destruction of major plant tissues. The choice to dry or freeze will depend on the compound of interest. Drying quantitatively affects alkaloids but not the phenols.

Limitations

Spatial and temporal variations are not catered for.

References

  1. Liu RH. Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention: mechanism of action. J Nutr. 2004;134(12):3479S–85S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar V, et al. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial and antioxidant potential of ethanolic extract and its fractions of bark and leaves of Terminalia arjuna from north-western Himalayas, India. J Tradit Complement Med. 2018;8:100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desgagné-Penix I. Distribution of alkaloids in woody plants. Plant Sci Today. 2017;4(3):137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Panghal M, et al. Indigenous knowledge of medicinal plants used by Saperas community of Khetawas, Jhajjar District, Haryana, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6(1):4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ocheng F, et al. Antibacterial activities of extracts from Ugandan medicinal plants used for oral care. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;155(1):852–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahomoodally MF. Traditional medicines in Africa: an appraisal of ten potent African medicinal plants. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:617459.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tabuti JR, Kukunda CB, Waako PJ. Medicinal plants used by traditional medicine practitioners in the treatment of tuberculosis and related ailments in Uganda. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;127(1):130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tabuti JR, et al. Herbal medicine use in the districts of Nakapiripirit, Pallisa, Kanungu, and Mukono in Uganda. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8(1):35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eloff JN. Antibacterial activity of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea (A. rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro) (Anacardiaceae) bark and leaves. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;76(3):305–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Couto RO, et al. Spray-dried rosemary extracts: physicochemical and antioxidant properties. Food Chem. 2012;131(1):99–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schweiggert U, Carle R, Schieber A. Conventional and alternative processes for spice production—a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(5):260–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwok B, Hu C, Durance T, Kitts D. Dehydration techniques affect phytochemical contents and free radical scavenging activities of Saskatoon berries (Amelanchier alnifolia Nutt.). J Food Sci. 2004;69(3):SNQ122–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gębczyński P, Lisiewska Z. Comparison of the level of selected antioxidative compounds in frozen broccoli produced using traditional and modified methods. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2006;7(3):239–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wollgast J, Anklam E. Review on polyphenols in Theobroma cacao: changes in composition during the manufacture of chocolate and methodology for identification and quantification. Food Res Int. 2000;33(6):423–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi W, Wetzstein HY. Effects of drying and extraction conditions on the biochemical activity of selected herbs. HortScience. 2011;46(1):70–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Engeu OP, et al. Repeat-dose effects of Zanthoxylum chalybeum root bark extract: a traditional medicinal plant used for various diseases in Uganda. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;2(8):101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tabuti JRS. Herbal medicines used in the treatment of malaria in Budiope county, Uganda. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116(1):33–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dikshit SS, Kala CP. Traditional utilization and harvesting of medicinal plants in Mandla district of Madhya Pradesh. Appl Ecol Environ Sci. 2014;2(2):48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tshisikhawe M, Van Rooyen M, Bhat R. An evaluation of the extent and threat of bark harvesting of medicinal plant species in the Venda Region, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int J Exp Bot. 2012;81:89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Youssef HM, Hassan WHB. Chemical constituents of Carissa edulis Vahl. Arab J Chem. 2017;10(1):109–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maina GS, et al. Antinociceptive properties of dichloromethane: methanolic leaf and root bark extracts of Carissa edulis in rats. J Phytopharmacol. 2015;4(2):106–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olila D, Opuda-Asibo J. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of extracts of Zanthoxylum chalybeum and Warburgia ugandensis, Ugandan medicinal plants. Afr Health Sci. 2001;1(2):66–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li M, et al. Applications of HPLC/MS in the analysis of traditional Chinese medicines. J Pharm Anal. 2011;1(2):81–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bouayad N, et al. Dietary effects of harmine, a β-carboline alkaloid, on development, energy reserves and α-amylase activity of Plodia interpunctella Hübner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2012;19(1):73–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang W-Y, Cai Y-Z, Zhang Y. Natural phenolic compounds from medicinal herbs and dietary plants: potential use for cancer prevention. Nutr Cancer. 2009;62(1):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic–phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16(3):144.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. https://www.R-project.org/.

  28. Lin D, et al. An overview of plant phenolic compounds and their importance in human nutrition and management of type 2 diabetes. Molecules. 2016;21(10):1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weidner S, et al. Phenolic compounds and properties of antioxidants in grapevine roots [Vitis vinifera L.] under drought stress followed by recovery. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 2009;78(2):97–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Larbat R, et al. Organ-specific responses of tomato growth and phenolic metabolism to nitrate limitation. Plant Biol. 2012;14(5):760–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Larbat R, et al. Phenolic characterization and variability in leaves, stems and roots of Micro-Tom and patio tomatoes, in response to nitrogen limitation. Plant Sci. 2014;224:62–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirk H, et al. Species by environment interactions affect pyrrolizidine alkaloid expression in Senecio jacobaea, Senecio aquaticus, and their hybrids. J Chem Ecol. 2010;36(4):378–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Adesina S. The Nigerian Zanthoxylum; chemical and biological values. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2006;2(3):282–301.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sun B, et al. Genetic variation in alkaloid accumulation in leaves of Nicotiana. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14(12):1100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. War AR, et al. Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(10):1306–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gianoli E, Salgado-Luarte C. Tolerance to herbivory and the resource availability hypothesis. Biol Lett. 2017;13(5):20170120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferrieri AP, et al. Temporal changes in allocation and partitioning of new carbon as 11C elicited by simulated herbivory suggest that roots shape aboveground responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013;161(2):692–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Milugo TK, et al. Antagonistic effect of alkaloids and saponins on bioactivity in the quinine tree (Rauvolfia caffra sond.): further evidence to support biotechnology in traditional medicinal plants. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13(1):285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Leonard OP, et al. Phytochemical characterization and cytotoxicity of Carissa edulis, Azadirachta indica, Cassia siamea and Harrisonia abyssinica from Masumbi Village, Siaya County-Kenya. J Sci Res Rep. 2016;10:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Royer M, et al. Is the C:N ratio a reliable indicator of C allocation to primary and defence-related metabolisms in tomato? Phytochemistry. 2013;88:25–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hossain MB, Brunton NP, Rai DK. Effect of drying methods on the steroidal alkaloid content of potato peels, shoots and berries. Molecules. 2016;21(4):403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chauhan A, Tanwar B, Arneja I. Influence of processing on physiochemical, nutritional and phytochemical composition of Carissa spinarum (karonda) fruit. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;8(6):254–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nayak B, Liu RH, Tang J. Effect of processing on phenolic antioxidants of fruits, vegetables, and grains—a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(7):887–918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gan R-Y, et al. Hot air drying induces browning and enhances phenolic content and antioxidant capacity in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) sprouts. J Food Process Preserv. 2017;41(1):e12846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

SG and GA conceived the research, wrote proposal and edited manuscript. JSN and JBO collected and prepared samples, wrote and edited manuscript and analyzed data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Appreciation goes all the participants in the project including Emily Kamusiime, Busingye Samuel and Kato Sula.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Some samples were collected and pressed. They were checked by the NaFORRI curator before being kept at the institute herbarium. The datasets generated and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was funded through the Agricultural Technology and Agribusiness Advisory Services (ATAAS) project of the government of Uganda.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Ssali Nantongo.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nantongo, J.S., Odoi, J.B., Abigaba, G. et al. Variability of phenolic and alkaloid content in different plant parts of Carissa edulis Vahl and Zanthoxylum chalybeum Engl.. BMC Res Notes 11, 125 (2018). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-018-3238-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3238-4

Keywords