Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate associations with retention in care

From: Examining the relationship between interpersonal support and retention in HIV care among HIV+ nursing mothers in Uganda

 

Retention in HIV care

p-value

No

Yes

Characteristics

n (%), unless indicated otherwise

 

ISEL [M(SD); min, max]

27.52a (4.22); 20, 36

24.98b (4.55); 9, 36

0.01

Control variables

   

Age

  

0.520

 15–24 years

10 (19.23)

42 (80.77)

 

 25–34 years

9 (12.50)

63 (87.50)

 

 35 years+ 

6 (19.35)

25 (80.65)

 

Education

  

0.903

 None

2 (15.38)

11 (84.62)

 

 Primary

17 (15.45)

93 (84.55)

 

 Secondary

6 (18.75)

26 (81.25)

 

Cowife

  

0.267

 No

11 (12.64)

76 (87.36)

 

 Yes

9 (24.32)

28 (75.68)

 

 Don’t know

4 (15.38)

22 (84.62)

 

Missing

   

 Number of children

  

0.922

 One child

5 (13.16)

33 (86.84)

 

 Two children

7 (18.92)

30 (81.08)

 

 Three children

7 (17.07)

34 (82.93)

 

 Four children plus

6 (15.79)

32 (84.21)

 

Missing

   

Financial sufficiency

  

0.435

 Insufficient

22 (17.19)

106 (82.81)

 

 Sufficient

3 (11.11)

24 (88.89)

 

Food insecurity

  

0.154

 Food insecure

16 (20.78)

61 (79.22)

 

 Food secure

9 (12.16)

65 (87.84)

 

Missing

   

 Monthly income

  

0.722

 No income

15 (17.05)

73 (82.95)

 

 UGX 10,000+ 

10 (14.93)

57 (85.07)

 
  1. Two samples t-test with unequal variances was used to assess the association between ISEL-12 and Retention in HIV Care. Chi-square test of independence was used to assess the relationship between other covariates and Retention in HIV Care
  2. a95% CI: 25.78, 29.26
  3. b95% CI: 24.20, 25.77