Skip to main content

Ratio between Lactobacillus plantarum and Acetobacter pomorum on the surface of Drosophila melanogaster adult flies depends on cuticle melanisation

Abstract

Objectives

As in most organisms, the surface of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is associated with bacteria. To examine whether this association depends on cuticle quality, we isolated and quantified surface bacteria in normal and melanized flies applying a new and simple protocol.

Results

On wild flies maintained in the laboratory, we identified two persistently culturable species as Lactobacillus plantarum and Acetobacter pomorum by 16S rDNA sequencing. For quantification, we showered single flies for DNA extraction avoiding the rectum to prevent contamination from the gut. In quantitative PCR analyses, we determined the relative abundance of these two species in surface wash samples. On average, we found 17-times more A. pomorum than L. plantarum. To tentatively study the importance of the cuticle for the interaction of the surface with these bacteria, applying Crispr/Cas9 gene editing in the initial wild flies, we generated flies mutant for the ebony gene needed for cuticle melanisation and determined the L. plantarum to A. pomorum ratio on these flies. We found that the ratio between the two bacterial species reversed on ebony flies. We hypothesize that the cuticle chemistry is crucial for surface bacteria composition. This finding may inspire future studies on cuticle-microbiome interactions.

Introduction

Bacteria populate the surface of many organisms. While skin bacteria are well analysed in vertebrates including humans [1, 2], surface bacteria-insect interactions have been largely neglected to date. Most of data on surface bacteria come from studies in ants such as Camponotus femoratus and Crematogaster levior. In ant colonies, surface bacteria are considered to be involved in protection against fungal infection [3, 4]. A few data are available on bacteria on the surface of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. The most common surface bacteria in this species belong to the genera Lactobacillus and Acetobacter [5]. The role of surface bacteria in D. melanogaster has not been studied and remains speculative.

The parameters on the insect defining bacteria-insect surface association are largely unknown. It is conceivable that microorganisms interact with components of the cuticle that is a stratified extracellular matrix composed of chitin, proteins, catecholamines and lipids [6]. Especially, the components of the surface called envelope including waxes and cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) [7] may be used as a substrate for bacterial attachment and/or for nutrition. In addition, this interaction may also depend on the inner-cuticle chemical environment including water content that in turn, at least partly, depends on the hardening and melanisation degree of the cuticle that involves a well-studied cascade of reactions catalysed by cytoplasmic and extracellular enzymes [8].

In the present work, we have designed a protocol for surface bacteria isolation and relative quantification in D. melanogaster. In a pilot experiment, we show that the bacterial composition depends on cuticle melanisation.

Main text

Materials and methods

Fly work

Tübingen2018 field flies deriving from seven founder flies caught in Tübingen were kept under laboratory conditions (22 °C, 50–70% air humidity) in vials with artificial diet consisting of corn meal, agar, beet sugar, propionic acid, dry yeast and Nipagin M. For fluorescein feeding, fluorescein sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich) was mixed with fresh baker’s yeast added to the vials.

Isolation of surface bacteria

Flies were individually rubbed against the surface of a sterile agar plate (China Blue, ECI, EMB, LB, BHI and MRS, Sigma-Aldrich) inside laminar conditions using sterile forceps and incubated for 1–5 days aerobically. Among mixed populations of different microorganisms, individual colonies were isolated and sub-cultured twice to ensure purity. Bacteria were characterized morphologically using a light microscope and identified by 16S rDNA analysis.

Molecular biology

DNA template was prepared from individual bacterial colonies. 16S rDNA amplification was carried out according to a standard protocol by PCR using the universal primers 27F (5ʹ-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3ʹ) and 1492R (5ʹ-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3ʹ) [9]. PCR products were purified using the GenElute™ PCR Clean-Up Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and sequenced (Macrogen). Sequences were aligned to sequences of the NCBI database using BlastN.

For quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments, single flies were immobilised with forceps and spilled with Tris–EDTA (pH8.0) containing 200 ng/µl Proteinase K avoiding the rectum. The wash solutions of 20 flies were combined, incubated at 65 °C for 30 min and frozen at − 20 °C. After thawing and centrifugation, 5 µl of this solution was used in a 10 µl reaction solution containing 1 µl of each species-specific primer and 2 µl of the FastStart Essential DNA Green Master solution (Roche). For species-specific qPCR, the primers pREV (5ʹ-TCGGGATTACCAAACATCAC-3ʹ) and pLanF (5ʹ-CCGTTTCTGCGGAACACCTA-3ʹ) to amplify recA (318 bp) in Lactobacillus plantarum [10] and PASTEU-F (5ʹ-TCAAGTCCTCATGGCCCTTATG-3ʹ) and PASTEU-R (5ʹ-TCGAGTTGCAGAGTGCAATCC-3ʹ) to amplify 130 bp of the 16S rDNA loci of Acetobacter species including A. pomorum and A. pasteurianus were used [11].

qPCR data analysis and statistics

After determination of the Cq values of the bacterial amplicons on a Roche LightCycler Nano with the respective software, we determined the fold-differences between the expression levels of each species by calculating 2(highestCq−lowestCq) (i.e., 2(CqLpla−CqApom) or 2(CqApom−CqLpla)). In extracts from Tübingen2018 flies (n = 5), the Cq values of the L. plantarum amplicon were always higher than the Cq values of the A. pomorum amplicon, while in extracts from ebony flies (n = 6), in all but one case, the Cq values of the A. pomorum amplicon were always higher than the Cq values of the L. plantarum amplicon; in the one outlier case, the fold-difference was almost one. To account for this qualitative shift between A. pomorum versus L. plantarum abundance, we reversed the calculated fold-difference by multiplication with − 1 when the L. plantarum Cq was lower than the A. pomorum Cq in our statistical analyses. As normal distribution of data could not be reasonably assumed (n = 5 and 6), data were analysed by the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test.

Gene editing

To mutate the ebony locus in Tübingen2018 flies, gene editing according to the Crispr/cas9 method was applied. We used the published gDNA (oligos: 5ʹ-GCGTTTAGTCGCAAAGAAGAA-3ʹ and 5ʹ-TACTGCCCGAGGTGTAGAGC-3ʹ) directed against the ebony gene sub-cloned in the pCDF3 vector [12]. This construct (550 ng/µl TE buffer) was injected into pre-blastoderm embryos together with 250 ng/µl of Cas9 protein (New England Biolabs). To identify mutant ebony alleles, the respective flies were crossed to flies segregating the known ebony1 allele. Stocks of dark flies were established. Homozygous ebony mutant flies (ebonycc1, 3 or 4) were sequenced to identify the mutation.

Results and discussion

Isolation and quantification of D. melanogaster surface bacteria

We have developed a simple protocol to isolate and quantify surface bacteria from adult D. melanogaster by single fly showering for DNA extraction and subsequent quantitative PCR (qPCR). During the wash procedure, we avoided the contact of the wash solution with the rectum thereby preventing contamination with gut microbes. This protocol differs substantially from a protocol published recently on ant surface bacteria identification [13]. In that case, whole ants were stirred in microtubes for DNA extraction. In a strict sense, this protocol cannot exclude gut microbe contamination in the wash solution. We assume that our simple protocol is applicable on any insect species.

Lactobacillus plantarum and Acetobacter pomorum are the major culturable bacteria on the fly surface

To isolate and characterise surface bacteria, we streaked the dorsum of living Tübingen2018 flies on different media including MRS (DeMan, Rogosa, Sharpe). To exclude gut-derived bacteria, we avoided contacting the rectum with the medium. Persistently, in independent experiments, we observed two types of colonies on MRS plates (Fig. 1). The colonies were round and white or yellowish. Under the light microscope, bacteria from both colonies showed a rode shape (Fig. 1). To determine the species, we amplified the 16S rDNA locus using universal primers and sequenced the amplicon. Alignment of the amplified sequences with sequences from the NCBI nucleotide database revealed that the 16S rDNA sequence from bacteria forming white colonies was similar to the respective sequence from Lactobacillus plantarum (Table 1), while the 16S rDNA sequence from bacteria forming yellow colonies was similar to the respective sequence from Acetobacter species including A. pomorum and A. pasteurianus (Table 1). To distinguish between these two species, we determined the sequence of the groEL gene. The sequence amplified from our bacteria was more similar to the groEL sequence of A. pomorum than to the respective sequence of A. pasteurianus.

Fig. 1
figure1

Lactobacillus plantarum and A. pomorum are present on the surface of D. melanogaster. Upon streaking D. melanogaster on an MRS plate. Two types of heaps of bacteria were observed (A). We isolated single colonies that were white or beige (B). After sequencing the 16S rDNA, the white colonies were identified as L. plantarum (Lpla) and the beige colonies as A. pomorum (Apom). Under the microscope, both bacteria are rode shaped [L. plantarum (C). A. pomorum (D)]

Table 1 Identification of the bacterial species

Both species had been found to be present in the D. melanogaster gut [14]. In the gut, L. plantarum was reported to promote growth by interfering with the insulin and ecdysone signalling pathways on poor-condition medium [15]. In another work, it was found that, by contrast, intestinal L. plantarum had a negative effect on D. melanogaster life span [16]. We presume that L. plantarum on the cuticle surface does not contribute to any of these effects as the gut and surface micro-environments are fundamentally different. Indeed, while in the gut these bacteria live under anaerobic conditions, on the fly surface, they rather face aerobic conditions. Supposedly, their physiology and, by consequence, their role changes accordingly. For instance, aerobic but not anaerobic cultures of L. plantarum produce H2O2 [17]. At the cuticle surface, H2O2 might oxidise CHCs and thereby modify the barrier function of this layer. A second possible function of L. plantarum on the cuticle surface is partner attraction and to promote crowding. Indeed, D. melanogaster has been shown to be attracted by yet unidentified volatile compounds of L. plantarum [18].

The fly surface is not soiled by faeces

Lactobacillus plantarum and A. pomorum are also present in the gut suggesting that their presence on the fly surface may originate from faeces. To verify whether the surface of flies contains excreted material, we fed flies with fluorescein and imaged their surface by fluorescence microscopy (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Only very little fluorescence signal was detected on the fly surface. We conclude that contamination of the surface by faeces is a very rare event and therefore probably negligible. This observation, nevertheless, allows the hypothesis that faecal bacteria might be the actual source of the surface populations.

Relative quantification of bacteria by qPCR

Isolation and cultivation of bacteria from the fly surface on media plates does not allow relative quantification as standardisation of bacterial transfer from flies to the plate is not possible. Therefore, we determined the fold-differences between L. plantarum and A. pomorum indirectly using species-specific primers in qPCR experiments. We compared their abundance on Tübingen2018 flies (Fig. 2). In mean, there were 17 times more A. pomorum than L. plantarum on these flies.

Fig. 2
figure2

The ratio between L. plantarum and A. pomorum depends on the fly genotype. Applying qPCR, we detected L. plantarum and A. pomorum in the wash solution of fly surfaces in independent experiments using genus-specific primers (1–3). In ebony mutant flies (ebonycc1. 3 & 4) that derive from Tübingen2018 flies (Tü 2018) by gene editing, the relative fold-difference (y-axis) between L. plantarum and A. pomorum is reversed compared to the situation in the original flies. Data are shown as boxplots (n = 5 for Tübingen2018. n = 6 for ebony flies). Central traits represent the median, crosses the mean. Boxes indicate first and third quartile and whiskers represent the range. The broad data range is probably due to the genetic variation of the fly populations that derive from several founders. Data were analysed using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test with the null hypothesis (H0) that the two populations “Tübingen2018” and “ebony” are not different. With α = 0.05 and U = 30. The p-value for this test is 0.004 allowing to refute H0. Applying the parametric Student’s T-test, we obtain a p-value of 0.013 (data now shown) suggesting a significant difference between the data of the two populations. We consider this test, however, as inappropriate as we cannot assume a normal distribution of the data

In order to test the influence of the cuticle on the load of L. plantarum and A. pomorum, we introduced mutations in the ebony gene of Tübingen2018 flies that codes for β-alanyl-dopamine (NBAD) synthase involved in cuticle melanisation [8]. Three independent mutations in the ebony gene (ebonycc1, ebonycc3, ebonycc4) were recovered. The respective homozygous mutant flies that are darker than wild-type flies are viable. We determined the fold-difference between L. plantarum and A. pomorum on the surface of ebony flies by qPCR (Fig. 2). We found that compared to Tübingen2018 control flies, L. plantarum were more abundant than A. pomorum on ebony flies. We conclude that their load depends on Ebony and probably on melanisation. It remains to be shown whether Ebony and melanisation either promote L. plantarum or inhibit A. pomorum growth. Classically, according to the melanism-desiccation hypothesis, enhanced melanisation has been considered as a response to dry environment to prevent desiccation [7]. For instance, in the melanic drosophilid D. kikkawai higher abdominal melanisation correlates with enhanced desiccation resistance [19]. However, there are cases reported that contradict this hypothesis [20, 21]. Desiccation resistance, for example, did not correlate with the body colour intensity in D. melanogaster field populations in India [21]. Thus, melanisation is probably a trade-off trait not only dictated by humidity conditions. Based on this assumption, we speculate that Ebony-driven melanisation may also be involved in controlling the interaction between the fly body and bacteria conferring a yet unknown advantage. Alternatively, Ebony may have a function in the differentiation of the envelope and the surface CHCs. Indeed, recently, it was found that longer chain CHCs prevailed in ebony mutant females [22]. This suggests that L. plantarum and A. pomorum differ in their preference on CHC environment. In summary, these data support the view that the insect cuticle surface is not an inert substrate for bacteria.

Limitations

The ratio between L. plantarum and A. pomorum on the surface of D. melanogaster changes depending on the genetic background suggesting that the insect-bacteria interaction may be under genetic control. The significance of this interaction is unclear as our conclusion relies only on the impact of a single gene i.e., ebony on the insect-bacteria interaction. More work is needed in this direction.

We should point out that the flies used in this work were kept under laboratory conditions. Hence, it is unclear whether our work reflects the situation in the field.

A major uncertainty in this work concerns the bacterial species. The amplified A. pomorum 16S rDNA sequence is 100% identical to the respective sequence in A. pasteurianus [11]. The provisional identification of A. pomorum is based on the groEL sequence. The groEL sequence determined in this work is, however, not identical to the A. pomorum groEL sequence from the NCBI database. Thus, it is well possible that the Acetobacter species isolated in this work is neither pomorum nor pasteurianus but a third yet unknown species not present in the sequence databases. Additional analyses are needed to clarify this issue.

Availability of data and materials

All data are presented in the manuscript. Upon request, fly stocks will be shared by the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

Apom:

Acetobacter pomorum

bp:

Base pairs

CHC:

Cuticular hydrocarbon

Crispr/Cas9:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9

gDNA:

guide DNA

groEL:

60 KDa chaperonin

Lpla:

Lactobacillus planatrum

qPCR:

quantitative polymerase chain reaction

16S rDNA:

16S ribosomal DNA

References

  1. 1.

    Schommer NN, Gallo RL. Structure and function of the human skin microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21(12):660–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chen YE, Fischbach MA, Belkaid Y. Skin microbiota-host interactions. Nature. 2018;553(7689):427–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Birer C, Moreau CS, Tysklind N, Zinger L, Duplais C. Disentangling the assembly mechanisms of ant cuticular bacterial communities of two Amazonian ant species sharing a common arboreal nest. Mol Ecol. 2020;29(7):1372–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mattoso TC, Moreira DD, Samuels RI. Symbiotic bacteria on the cuticle of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus protect workers from attack by entomopathogenic fungi. Biol Lett. 2012;8(3):461–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ren C, Webster P, Finkel SE, Tower J. Increased internal and external bacterial load during Drosophila aging without life-span trade-off. Cell Metab. 2007;6(2):144–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Moussian B. Recent advances in understanding mechanisms of insect cuticle differentiation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;40(5):363–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang Y, Ferveur JF, Moussian B. Eco-genetics of desiccation resistance in Drosophila. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021;96(4):1421–40. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/brv.12709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Noh MY, Muthukrishnan S, Kramer KJ, Arakane Y. Cuticle formation and pigmentation in beetles. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016;17:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Janda JM, Abbott SL. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(9):2761–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tsai C-C, Lai C-H, Yu B, Tsen H-Y. Use of PCR primers and probes based on the 23S rRNA and internal transcription spacer (ITS) gene sequence for the detection and enumerization of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum in feed supplements. Anaerobe. 2010;16:270–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Torija MJ, Mateo E, Guillamon JM, Mas A. Identification and quantification of acetic acid bacteria in wine and vinegar by TaqMan-MGB probes. Food Microbiol. 2010;27(2):257–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Port F, Chen HM, Lee T, Bullock SL. Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(29):E2967-2976.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Birer C, Tysklind N, Zinger L, Duplais C. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction methods to study the body surface microbiota of insects: a case study with ant cuticular bacteria. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017;17(6):e34–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Broderick NA, Lemaitre B. Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster. Gut Microbes. 2012;3(4):307–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Storelli G, Defaye A, Erkosar B, Hols P, Royet J, Leulier F. Lactobacillus plantarum promotes Drosophila systemic growth by modulating hormonal signals through TOR-dependent nutrient sensing. Cell Metab. 2011;14(3):403–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fast D, Duggal A, Foley E. Monoassociation with Lactobacillus plantarum disrupts intestinal homeostasis in adult Drosophila melanogaster. mBio. 2018;9(4):e01114–18. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/mBio.01114-18.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Murphy MG, Condon S. Correlation of oxygen utilization and hydrogen peroxide accumulation with oxygen induced enzymes in Lactobacillus plantarum cultures. Arch Microbiol. 1984;138(1):44–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Qiao H, Keesey IW, Hansson BS, Knaden M. Gut microbiota affects development and olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 2019; 222(5):jeb192500. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1242/jeb.192500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ramniwas S, Kajla B. Divergent strategy for adaptation to drought stress in two sibling species of montium species subgroup: Drosophila kikkawai and Drosophila leontia. J Insect Physiol. 2012;58(12):1525–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rajpurohit S, Peterson LM, Orr AJ, Marlon AJ, Gibbs AG. An experimental evolution test of the relationship between melanism and desiccation survival in insects. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9): e0163414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Aggarwal DD, Ranga P, Kalra B, Parkash R, Rashkovetsky E, Bantis LE. Rapid effects of humidity acclimation on stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2013;166(1):81–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Massey JH, Akiyama N, Bien T, Dreisewerd K, Wittkopp PJ, Yew JY, Takahashi A. Pleiotropic effects of ebony and tan on pigmentation and cuticular hydrocarbon composition in Drosophila melanogaster. Front Physiol. 2019;10:518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funding for this work was provided by the German Research Foundation to B.M. (MO1714/9-1, University of Tübingen). The funders had no role in study design, experiment execution or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VM, NG and BM carried out the molecular biology. NG and BM generated CRISPR/Cas9-edited fly strains. VM, JFP and BM executed the analysis. VM wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. VM, JFP, YW and BM interpreted the data. BM wrote and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Moussian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

There are only little faeces on the fly surface. The surface of flies fed with yeast supplemented with fluorescein did not show abundant fluorescence signal (arrows). To visualize fluorescein traces on the fly surface, flies were anesthetized with CO2 and viewed with the Nikon AZ100 using fluorescence microscopy mode with a LED light source and a F36-525 HC-set EGFP filter. Bacterial colonies in Fig. 1 were observed and imaged on a Leica EZ4 stereomicroscope with in-built camera using the software LAX. Bacterial cells were viewed on a Nikon Ti2 microscope using phase contrast microscopy with a S Plan Fluor ELWD 40 × Ph2 ADM objective.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mokeev, V., Flaven-Pouchon, J., Wang, Y. et al. Ratio between Lactobacillus plantarum and Acetobacter pomorum on the surface of Drosophila melanogaster adult flies depends on cuticle melanisation. BMC Res Notes 14, 351 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-021-05766-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Microbiome
  • Bacteria
  • Insect
  • Drosophila
  • Cuticle