Skip to main content

Elevated fecal calprotectin is linked to psychosocial complexity in pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders

Abstract

Objective

Children with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPD) and clinical elevations in three risk areas (anxiety, functional disability, and pain) have been found to be at increased risk for persistent disability. We evaluated if the presence of these three risk factors corresponded with greater gastrointestinal inflammation (measured via fecal calprotectin; FC) compared to those with no risk factors. FC concentration differences between children with three risk factors and those with one and two risk factors were explored.

Results

Fifty-six children with FAPD (Mage = 12.23) completed measures of anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders), disability (Functional Disability Inventory), and pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale). Participants were stratified into risk groups (range: 0–3). Fisher’s exact tests were conducted to determine if children with three versus fewer risk factors were more likely to have elevated FC (≥ 50 µg/g) versus normal levels. Children with three risk factors (MFC = 86.04) were more likely to have elevated FC compared to children with zero (MFC = 25.78), one (MFC = 38.59), and two risk factors (MFC = 45.06; p’s < 0.05). Those with three risk factors had borderline elevated FC concentrations whereas those with fewer had normal FC concentrations. Findings suggest the importance of a biopsychosocial approach to help elucidate a FAPD phenotype.

Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPD) are gastrointestinal (GI) conditions characterized by frequent abdominal pain episodes not attributed to an organic cause [1]. FAPD occurs in approximately 11–15% of all children and adolescents worldwide [2], and 25–45% experience persistent (i.e., > 5 years) pain and functional impairment [3]. A biopsychosocial approach may be helpful for understanding and assessing pediatric FAPD [4,5,6], as the presence of certain psychosocial risk factors (i.e., anxiety) are associated with increased functional impairment in children with FAPD [7,8,9]. Further, those who present with clinical elevations in three domains (i.e., anxiety, pain, and pain-related disability) are at increased risk for persistent disability [7, 8]. However, it is unknown how biological factors, such as GI inflammation, may relate to this complex clinical presentation of FAPD.

Although FAPD are typically thought to be non-inflammatory [10,11,12], low-grade GI inflammation may be present, and may relate to greater functional disability [13]. The goal of the current study is to establish the relationship between psychological and biological factors associated with complex FAPD. We predicted that the most clinically complex FAPD group (i.e., those characterized by clinically elevated anxiety, disability, and pain levels) [7, 8] would have clinically elevated fecal calprotectin (FC) levels, a GI inflammatory biomarker, compared to those in the lowest risk group (i.e., those with no elevations in anxiety, disability, and pain). We also explored differences in FC concentrations based on numbers of risk factors (ranging from 0 to 3).

Main text

Methods

Clinical data were gathered from 56 children between the ages of 9–14 with FAPD from a large Midwestern children’s hospital using de-identified data as a part of an Institutional Review Board approved process. These youth were also involved in prior studies examining (1) clinical characteristics of youth with FAPD [7,8,9], (2) neuroimaging of pain, or (3) behavioral interventions for FAPD [14, 15]. The participant’s gastroenterologist confirmed that the patient met criteria for FAPD based on ROME IV guidelines and also performed an FC assay. Patients were ineligible if they had a significant medical condition(s) with an identifiable organic cause or a documented developmental delay. Participants did not have an active infection at the time of study enrollment.

Measures

Demographic and background information

Demographic (e.g., age, sex) and background information (e.g., abdominal pain location) was collected from the parent and from the patient’s electronic medical record (EMR).

Fecal calprotectin (FC)

Fecal calprotectin is a biomarker of neutrophilic intestinal inflammation and is commonly assayed to evaluate a patient’s risk for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [16]. FC concentrations are obtained via a fecal assay and, due to a high negative predictive value to exclude IBD, have been used to differentiate IBD from functional GI conditions [17]. FC has greater sensitivity (70%) and specificity (93%) in children than adults [18]. To obtain FC concentrations, participants provided a stool sample as part of their clinical care. The Inova Quanta Lite® Calprotectin ELISA assay was used to test FC levels. These values were recorded in the participants’ EMR and obtained via chart review. Manufacturer-recommended clinical cut-offs for interpreting FC concentrations include normal (< 50 µg/g), borderline (50–120 µg/g), and abnormal (> 120 µg/g).

Clinical risk

Participants were stratified into risk groups (range: 0–3) based on their scores on the measures detailed below. These measures were administered as part of their clinical care to determine risk status [7, 15]. Clinical elevations in all three domains listed below were defined as the most clinically complex FAPD group. This approach been shown to identify patients at greatest risk for pain-related impairment over time [7].

Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders—Child Report (SCARED) [19, 20]

A 41-item measure (total score range: 0–82) that assesses anxiety symptoms. It has been validated in pediatric chronic pain samples [21, 22] and is used to screen for anxiety in children with FAPD [8, 15]. A cut-off of ≥ 25 is indicative of clinically significant anxiety [19, 20] and has been shown to correspond to increased pain-related impairment and pain levels in youth with chronic pain including FAPD [7, 8, 14, 15]. Therefore, this cut-off was used to determine presence of risk in the current study.

Functional Disability Inventory—Child Version (FDI) [23]

A validated measure of daily functional impairment due to pain symptoms. The FDI consists of 15 items (total score range: 0–60) and has established cut-offs [24]. Participants with at least moderate disability (FDI ≥ 13) were considered clinically elevated.

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity [25]

Participants rated their average pain intensity over the past 2 weeks using a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher pain levels. Participants reporting at least moderate pain (NRS ≥ 4) were considered clinically elevated.

Additional clinical data

Erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR), c-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, immunoglobulin A (IgA), and anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG-IgA) are laboratory markers commonly obtained via blood test for differential diagnostic purposes in GI clinics [26, 27]. ESR and CRP are sometimes used by providers to help establish a diagnosis of IBD. ESR, the rate at which erythrocytes settle in a blood sample, indicates inflammation in the body and has been shown to correlate with clinical activity in individuals with IBD [28]. CRP is a protein produced by the liver that is released into the bloodstream often after inflammation onset [29]. It has also been associated with clinical activity in pediatric IBD, particularly with Crohn’s disease [29]. The tTG-IgA test is positive in about 98% of patients with celiac disease on a gluten-containing diet and is therefore used to rule out celiac disease [30]. A total serum IgA test is used to detect whether or not a patient has an IgA deficiency, which is associated with celiac disease and can result in a false negative tTg-IgA finding [30]. Esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) and colonoscopies are sometimes administered for pediatric patients with GI complaints for the diagnosis of a range of organic GI conditions, like IBD and celiac disease [31]. They allow for the visualization of the digestive tract and can be used to obtain biopsies [31]. Tests were offered at the discretion of each patient’s gastroenterologist to rule out IBD and were individualized based on the patient’s presenting symptoms. In general, patients with FC concentrations > 250 µg/g and epigastric abdominal pain in the absence of weight loss and anemia were also routinely administered an EGD.

Data analytic approach

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 [32]. The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Item level data were available for all participants but one that was missing SCARED data; thus, no statistical adjustments for missing data were made. Descriptives were used to examine demographic and clinical characteristics and to categorize youth by presence of clinical elevations in anxiety, disability, and pain (ranging from 0 to 3) [7]. Normality of data was assessed. As expected, FC concentration was negatively skewed so non-parametric analyses were used. FC concentration was dichotomized into normal (< 50 µg/g) and elevated (≥ 50 µg/g). Fisher’s exact tests were performed to examine the relation between those with three risk factors versus fewer risk factors in FC elevation. Exploratory Fisher’s exact analyses were conducted to examine differences in FC elevation between other risk groups. Exploratory analyses were also conducted to evaluate the relationships between FC concentration and socioeconomic index (SEI) and type of abdominal pain. Given that additional clinical tests were not given to the entire sample, we were unable to evaluate their associations with FC elevation.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Demographic and clinical data for the sample are presented in Table 1. The majority of the sample was Caucasian (n = 50, 89.3%) and female (n = 37, 66.1%) and the mean age was 12.23 ± 2.71 years. There were no significant differences between the risk groups with regards to age [H(3) = 4.346, p = 0.226], gender [X2(3) = 2.738, p = 0.434], SEI [H(3) = 3.751, p = 0.290], or abdominal pain location (p = 0.902, Fisher’s exact test, Cramer’s V = 0.255). The mean FC concentration for the total sample was 51.20 ± 71.44 µg/g, which is considered in the borderline range. Overall, 75% of participants had normal FC concentrations (n = 42) and 25% had elevated FC concentrations (n = 14). FC concentration did not differ by age (rs = 0.068, p = 0.620), gender [H(1) = 1.187, p = 0.276], SEI (rs = − 0.265, p = 0.109), or type of abdominal pain [H(4) = 7.668, p = 0.104].

Table 1 Sample Characteristics

Risk status

Participants were classified into four groups by number of risk factors based on clinical elevations: zero (16.1%), one (26.8%), two (30.4%), and three (26.8%; Fig. 1). Children with three risk factors were significantly more likely to have elevated FC concentrations than those with zero risk factors (p = 0.048, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, Cramer’s V = 0.422). Similarly, children with three risk factors were more likely to have elevated FC concentrations compared to children with one (p = 0.025, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, Cramer’s V = 0.424) and two risk factors (p = 0.040, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, Cramer’s V = 0.375). There were no significant differences in FC elevations between those with zero, one, and two risk factors (all p’s > 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure1

FC concentrations by risk factor classification. *Borderline FC concentration 50.1–120.00 μg/g. Children with three risk factors were more likely to have elevated FC concentrations compared to children with one (p = 0.025, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, Cramer’s V = 0.424) and two risk factors (p = 0.040, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, Cramer’s V = 0.375). The differences in FC concentrations between those with zero, one, and two risk factors were not significant (all p’s > 0.05)

Those with three risk factors (i.e., the most clinically complex manifestation of FAPD) had greater average levels of FC than those with two or fewer risk factors. There were no significant differences in FC elevations between those with zero, one, or two risk factors (all p’s > 0.05).

Exploratory analysis

Given the scope of the study, all participants who underwent an EGD as part of their clinical care had unremarkable endoscopy findings. Existing clinical test and EGD data for participants were gathered via chart review. Overall, 11 participants had EGD with routine biopsies. Twelve had colonoscopies with ileal intubation and routine biopsies, which were all within normal limits. Exploratory analyses revealed no significant differences in the other clinical test values by risk status groups (p’s > 0.05).

Discussion

The present study evaluates a biomarker of gastrointestinal inflammation in pediatric FAPD and demonstrates significantly associated elevated FC amongst those with a clinically complex FAPD profile (elevations in anxiety, disability, and pain) compared to those with two or fewer elevations. Few studies have examined FC in pediatric FAPD [13]. While a recent study detected an association between low-grade inflammation and increased pain interference in pediatric FAPD, [13] no study has examined how FC relates to high risk FAPD. This is an important area of investigation because it is already known that the high risk FAPD group (those categorized by elevations in anxiety, disability, and pain) is more likely to exhibit persistent disability [7].

Use of clinical data available through the EMR yielded meaningful information in this exploratory study. Future research efforts should seek to replicate our findings in larger, prospective trials. Although FC is the most commonly researched indicator of inflammatory response, levels of other GI inflammation biomarkers (e.g., fecal lactoferrin, S100A12, polymorphonuclear elastase, M2-PK [33]) should be evaluated. Additionally, it will be important to examine if GI inflammation differs by FAPD subtype and abdominal pain location in larger scale studies.

The study findings are potentially important for forming a stronger biopsychosocial conceptualization of pediatric FAPD. By defining a phenotype of complex pediatric FAPD characterized by clinically elevated levels of anxiety, disability, and pain, [7] in addition to increased FC levels, we may be better able to better identify youth with persistent FAPD and ultimately develop more targeted and effective treatments.

Limitations

  • The sample was relatively small with an unequal gender distribution in this exploratory investigation.

  • Due to the use of real world clinical data, some children received more investigations than others prior to receiving a diagnosis of FAPD from their gastroenterologist.

  • Collecting clinical data limited our ability to monitor/control for other factors (e.g., administration of other clinical tests, patient consumption of corticosteroids or mesalamine anti-inflammatory medications before the time of assay) [33] that might affect FC levels.

  • Caucasian children may be more likely to receive specialized care for FAPD, contributing to overrepresentation in research conducted in these settings [15, 34, 35] and in our study specifically.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FAPD:

Functional abdominal pain disorders

GI:

Gastrointestinal

FC:

Fecal calprotectin

EMR:

Electronic medical record

IBD:

Inflammatory bowel disease

SCARED:

Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders

FDI:

Functional Disability Inventory

NRS:

Numeric Rating Scale

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rates

RP:

C-reactive protein

IgA:

Immunoglobulin A

tTG-IgA:

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies

EGD:

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

SEI:

Socioeconomic index

References

  1. 1.

    Drossman DA. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: history, pathophysiology, clinical features, and Rome IV. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1262-1279.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Korterink JJ, Diederen K, Benninga MA, Tabbers MM. Epidemiology of pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Walker LS, Guite JW, Duke M, Barnard JA, Greene JW. Recurrent abdominal pain: a potential precursor of irritable bowel syndrome in adolescents and young adults. J Pediatr. 1998;132:1010–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cunningham CL, Banez GA. Pediatric gastrointestinal disorders: biopsychosocial assessment and treatment. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liossi C, Howard RF. Pediatric chronic pain: biopsychosocial assessment and formulation. Pediatrics. 2016. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1542/peds.2016-0331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Reed-Knight B, Maddux MH, Deacy AD, Lamparyk K, Stone AL, Mackner L. Brain–gut interactions and maintenance factors in pediatric gastroenterological disorders: recommendations for clinical care. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2017;5:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cunningham NR, Jagpal A, Peugh J, Farrell MK, Cohen MB, Mezoff AG, et al. Risk categorization predicts disability in pain-associated functional gastrointestinal disorders after 6 months. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64:685–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cunningham NR, Cohen MB, Farrell MK, Mezoff AG, Lynch-Jordan A, Kashikar-Zuck S. Concordant parent-child reports of anxiety predict impairment in youth with functional abdominal pain. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:312–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cunningham NR, Jagpal A, Tran ST, Kashikar-Zuck S, Goldschneider KR, Coghill RC, et al. Anxiety adversely impacts response to cognitive behavioral therapy in children with chronic pain. J Pediatr. 2016;171:227–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Foster R, Forgacs I, Bjarnason I. Use of surrogate markers of inflammation and Rome criteria to distinguish organic from nonorganic intestinal disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:450–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P, Kandala N-B, Shyangdan D, Arasaradnam R, et al. Faecal calprotectin testing for differentiating amongst inflammatory and non-inflammatory bowel diseases: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–211.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Olafsdottir E, Aksnes L, Fluge G, Berstad A. Faecal calprotectin levels in infants with infantile colic, healthy infants, children with inflammatory bowel disease, children with recurrent abdominal pain and healthy children. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91:45–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shulman RJ, Eakin MN, Czyzewski DI, Jarrett M, Ou C-N. Increased gastrointestinal permeability and gut inflammation in children with functional abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome. J Pediatr. 2008;153:646–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cunningham NR, Nelson S, Jagpal A, Moorman E, Farrell M, Pentiuk S, et al. Development of the aim to decrease anxiety and pain treatment for pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66:16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cunningham NR, Moorman E, Brown CM, Mallon D, Chundi PK, Mara CA, et al. Integrating psychological screening into medical care for youth with abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 2018. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1542/peds.2017-2876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Konikoff MR, Denson LA. Role of fecal calprotectin as a biomarker of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:524–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mumolo MG, Bertani L, Ceccarelli L, Laino G, Di Fluri G, Albano E, et al. From bench to bedside: fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel diseases clinical setting. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:3681–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Carroccio A, Iacono G, Cottone M, Di Prima L, Cartabellotta F, Cavataio F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin assay in distinguishing organic causes of chronic diarrhea from irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective study in adults and children. Clin Chem. 2003;49:861–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M. Psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): a replication study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38:1230–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, et al. The screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:545–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jastrowski Mano KE, Evans JR, Tran ST, Anderson Khan K, Weisman SJ, Hainsworth KR. The psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders in pediatric chronic pain. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012;37:999–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cunningham NR, Jagpal A, Nelson S, Mano KEJ, Tran ST, Lynch-Jordan AM, et al. Clinical reference points for the screen for child anxiety related disorders in two investigations of youth with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2019;35:238–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Claar RL, Walker LS. Functional assessment of pediatric pain patients: psychometric properties of the functional disability inventory. Pain. 2006;121:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kashikar-Zuck S, Flowers SR, Claar RL, Guite JW, Logan DE, Lynch-Jordan AM, et al. Clinical utility and validity of the functional disability inventory (FDI) among a multicenter sample of youth with chronic pain. Pain. 2011;152:1600–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, von Baeyer CL, Miró J. Psychometric properties of the numerical rating scale to assess self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2017;33:376–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P. Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys? Gut. 2006;55:426–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bai JC, Fried M, Corazza GR, Schuppan D, Farthing M, Catassi C, et al. World Gastroenterology Organisation global guidelines on celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sachar DB, Smith H, Chan S, Cohen LB, Lichtiger S, Messer J. Erythrocytic sedimentation rate as a measure of clinical activity in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986;8:647–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tsampalieros A, Griffiths AM, Barrowman N, Mack DR. Use of C-reactive protein in children with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr. 2011;159:340–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Al-Toma A, Volta U, Auricchio R, Castillejo G, Sanders DS, Cellier C, et al. European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease (ESsCD) guideline for coeliac disease and other gluten-related disorders. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:583–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tringali A, Thomson M, Dumonceau J-M, Tavares M, Tabbers MM, Furlano R, et al. Pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guideline executive summary. Endoscopy. 2017;49:83–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Corporation I. SPSS for Windows, version 27.0. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Walsham NE, Sherwood RA. Fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2016;9:21–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Stone AL, Han GT, Bruehl S, Garber J, Smith CA, Anderson J, et al. Subgroups of pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain: replication, parental characteristics, and health service use. Clin J Pain. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schurman JV, Danda CE, Friesen CA, Hyman PE, Simon SD, Cocjin JT. Variations in psychological profile among children with recurrent abdominal pain. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2008;15:241–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was conducted using secondary data collected from studies funded by the Sharon S. Keller Chronic Pain Research Grant of the American Pain Society, the Place Outcomes Research Award from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, and a training Grant (K23 AT009458) from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health, all awarded to the senior author (NRC).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ELM: contributed to the conceptualization of the current study, data acquisition, statistical analyses, interpretation of the data, and writing and editing the manuscript. MF: contributed to the data acquisition, interpretation of the data, and editing of the manuscript. NS: contributed to the data acquisition, interpretation of the data, and editing of the manuscript. LD: contributed to the conceptualization of the current study, data acquisition, interpretation of the data, and editing of the manuscript. CL: contributed to the data acquisition and editing of the manuscript. NRC: contributed to the conceptualization of the current study, data acquisition, statistical analyses, interpretation of the data, and writing and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin L. Moorman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB00000231). The IRB approved the written consent and assent documents and procedures. Given that all participants were minors (under 18 years old), assent was obtained from each child and consent was obtained from their respective parent/legal guardian.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moorman, E.L., Farrell, M., Santucci, N. et al. Elevated fecal calprotectin is linked to psychosocial complexity in pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders. BMC Res Notes 14, 360 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-021-05776-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fecal calprotectin
  • Functional disability
  • Anxiety