Skip to main content

Table 1 Adolescent and staff participant characteristics

From: Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to promote healthy dietary choices in UK secondary school canteens: a qualitative study

Adolescent participants

ID

Age

IMD decilea

Gender

Ethnic group aggregated

Focus group

A1

13

1

Female

Not White British

Focus Group 1

A2

13

6

Male

White British

Focus Group 1

A3

13

2

Female

Not White British

Focus Group 1

A4

13

4

Female

Not White British

Focus Group 1

A5

12

7

Female

White British

Focus Group 1

A6

16

7

Female

Not White British

Focus Group 2

A7

17

7

Male

White British

Focus Group 2

A8

18

4

Male

Not White British

Focus Group 2

A9

14

2

Female

Not White British

Focus Group 2

A10

14

7

Male

White British

Focus Group 2

A11

14

8

Male

White British

Focus Group 2

A12

12

4

Male

Not White British

Focus group 3

A13

12

5

Male

White British

Focus group 3

A14

12

2

Female

Not White British

Focus group 3

A15

12

1

Female

Not White British

Focus group 3

Staff participants

ID

Age

 

Gender

Role

 

C1

35–44

n/a

Female

Catering staff

n/a

C2

35–44

n/a

Female

Catering staff

n/a

S1

25–34

n/a

Female

School staff

n/a

S2

45–54

n/a

Male

School staff

n/a

S3

25–34

n/a

Female

School staff

n/a

S4

45–54

n/a

Female

School staff

n/a

S5

55–64

n/a

Male

School staff

n/a

S6

45–54

n/a

Female

School staff

n/a

  1. aIMD decile of home postcode. 1 = most deprived decile