Skip to main content

Factors predicting readmission in patients with COVID-19



COVID-19 has been introduced by the World Health Organization as a health emergency worldwide. Up to 9% of the patients with COVID-19 may be readmitted by 2 months after discharge. This study aimed to estimate the readmission rate and identify main risk factors for readmission in these patients. In this prospective study, 416 discharged COVID patients followed up with a minimum 1 month and the readmission rate was recorded. Evaluated characteristics included time of readmission, age and sex, main symptoms of disease, result of computed tomography scan, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test and treatment modalities.


Regarding readmission, 51 patients of 416 discharged patients, was readmitted during the study period. The rate of readmission for 30 and 60 days after discharge was 7.6% and 8.1%, respectively. The median age of the readmitted patients was 67 years (IQR: 53–78). About 65% of readmitted patients had underlying disease. The most significant factor in readmission rate was related to the site of lung involvement (OR > 4). Age over 60 years, underlying disease especially diabetes (OR = 3.43), high creatinine level (≥ to 1.2 mg/dl) (OR = 2.15) were the most important predictors of readmission.


Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared by the World Health Organization as a global health emergency on January 30, 2020 [1, 2]. SARS-CoV-2 transmission rate is high but most people recover following COVID-19 like Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) [3, 4]. However in 5% of cases, hospitalization is essential to keep on the treatment process [5, 6], in other side the clear guidelines for the management of the patients with COVID-19 and the time of discharge have not yet been determined based on clinical evidence [5, 7]. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), up to 9% of the patients with COVID-19 may be readmitted within 2 months of discharge [8, 9]. Mostly male, old age and the presence of underlying disease or history of malignancy are associated with poor prognosis and readmission in this group of patients [10,11,12]. Comorbidities or heart disease were associated with higher odds of readmission in these patients [13,14,15,16]. Increment of readmission and ignoring related risk factors could lead to serious form of diseases and mortality based on the experience of previous respiratory pandemics [3, 17,18,19]. Not only COIVD-19 causes multi-organ failure, but also drugs used to treat COVID-19 cause complications, therefore follow up is essential to complete the treatment course [20,21,22]. Paying attention to the clinical aspects of readmission in these patients is fundamental to make better decision in follow-up [10, 11, 23, 24]. This study conducted to estimate the rate of readmission and identify main risk factors for readmission in the patients with COVID-19.

Main text

Methods and materials

Study setting & design

We performed prospective study on patients admitted with a diagnosis of COVID-19 in Vasei hospital, Khorasan Razavi province, Iran, between March 1, 2019 and May 20, 2020. The protocol of study was approved by ethics committee of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences (IR.MEDSAB.REC.1399.004) and informed consent form was obtained from all patients. The data were analyzed through STATA.

Study population

Study population was a cohort of 506 patients admitted with definite or clinical diagnosis of COVID-19. Diagnosis of COVID-19 was ascertained by a positive result of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and imaging finding. In this study, 92 patients who died during hospitalization were excluded from the study and 416 patients were discharged and followed up for at least 6 months.

Data collection

Clinical and demographic variables were included age, sex, symptoms, biochemical findings, CT scan and RT-PCR test results and underlying disease, pregnancy, and readmission rate, extracted from health information system (HIS). Comorbidities were measured using ICD-10 and categorized in three main groups diabetes, hypertension and other disease. Main symptoms and clinical variables that assessed in these patients were dry cough, fever and Spo2. Also, we assessed D-dimer (no/ yes) and level of creatinine (mg/dl). Additionally, some of other variable were recorded such as length of stay at hospital and use of mechanical ventilation. Moreover status of ground glass opacity and site of lesions was assessed in patient whit abnormal result through lung CT scans.

Main measurements

Readmission was evaluated as a primary outcome at a time interval of 3 to 180 days after discharge; secondary outcome was death in readmitted cases.


Readmission time of patients

In this study, 416 discharged patients were followed up, the mean follow-up was 61 ± 11.2 days. Fifty-one of the patients were readmitted, which 13 patients (25%) 1 week after discharge and 19 patients up to 30 days after discharge and 2 patients up to 60 days after discharge and the rest of the patients (n = 17) up to 40 weeks after discharge were readmitted. Readmission rate in 1 week, 30 days, 60 days and up to 40 weeks after discharge were 3.1%, 7.6%, 8.1% and 12.25%, respectively.

Characteristics of the patients

The mean age of the readmitted patients (n = 51) 65 ± 15.42 years. The mean age of the recovered patients was 56 ± 18.2 years (p < 0.001). The results showed that there was a significant relationship between underlying disease and readmission (p < 0.001). Two thirds of readmitted patients had a history of negative PCR results, although 84.3% of the readmitted patients had abnormal chest imaging results in the first hospitalization (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the recovered and readmitted patient

However, 84.3% of the readmitted patients had a history of abnormal CT scan presented in detail in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of readmission time of patients based on CT scan

Risk factor for readmission

To estimate and predict risk factor, regression models are helpful [25]. Risk of readmission for each of the related factors was estimated using regression model [26]. To find relationship between demographic, clinical, biochemical and therapeutic characteristics and dependent variable (readmission), regression models are used. The distribution of the data was normal checking with Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. After controlling the effect of other variables, the odds ratio of readmission in the patients with abnormal creatinine level and diabetes was 2.15 and 3.43, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Relationship between characteristics and readmission of COVID-19 patients


In this study the rate of readmission with the same interval was consistent with other studies, in which readmission in the first week after discharge was between 2 and 4% [23, 24, 27] and was reported 10% for 2 months after discharge [8]. In the follow-up of 279 discharged patients in Rhode Island of the United States, 30 days after discharge, readmission rate was reported 6.7% [10]. In Turkish study, 7.1% of discharged patients were readmitted [12].The readmission rate 2 months after discharge was 9% in the United States [8]. Donnelly et al. reported readmission rate up to 20% 2 months after discharge in the United States [28]. In another study, 10.3% of the discharged patients were readmitted to hospital 80 days after discharge [29]. However, in different findings in the Korean population, the readmission rate after discharge was 4.3% [11] and in Spanish population, the readmission rate was 4.4% up to 3 weeks after discharge [9].

The median length of stay at hospitals for the first time was 4 days similar to the findings of previous studies in Iran [30, 31]. A review of 52 studies estimated the median length of stay at hospitals up to 5 days [32] similar to the median length of stay in New York performed on 5700 patients [23]. Length of stay was very different in Korean hospitals (17 days) [11]. Also, in the present study, the median length of stay for readmitted and non-readmitted patients was 5 days (IQR: 3–9) and 4 days (IQR: 3–6), respectively, while in the Turkish study, the median length of stay was 4 days and 3 days, respectively [12].

The median length of stay in the Spanish readmitted patients with COVID-19 was lower than other patients (6 days vs. 9 days) [9]. Hospitalization of the patients has some conditions which include the capacity of the medical system, the quality of care and the demand for hospital beds in the pandemic period [12, 17, 33]. Different quality of post-discharge care can also have main role in the completion of the treatment process [24, 29].

Wu and McGoogan [34] and Richardson et al. [23] revealed that the odds ratio of readmission in elderly patients was higher than in other age groups. Underlying diseases, especially hypertension and diabetes, have also been confirmed in other COVID-19 studies [9, 10, 12, 24]. Aging reduces the response of immune cells to SARS-CoV-2; consequently the virus may be able to stay in the body longer. Complications in readmitted COVID-19 patients are more in elderly people [35], however these two factors may be strong predictors for readmission in the hospitalized patients [36]. High creatinine level in the hospitalized patients was another predictor for readmission in COVID-19 patients, so that the odds ratio of readmission for a creatinine level greater than 1.2 mg/dl was 2.15. Findings of the previous studies on other diseases also consider creatinine level as an effective factor for readmission of COVID-19 patients [37,38,39].

This finding was consistent with the findings of previous studies that introduced abnormal chest imaging results as a predictor of readmission [11, 40], so chest imaging is a suitable tool for managing COVID-19 patients after discharge [41,42,43]. Also, the possibility of a false negative result in PCR test was reported in previous studies [41]. At the end, the key point to indirectly avoid readmission is fully vaccination of the patients after recovery from the COVID-19 through approved vaccine as soon as possible [44, 45].


According to the results, age over 60 years, underlying disease especially diabetes, high creatinine level, duration of first-time hospitalization and lung involvement were the most important predictors of readmission in the patients with COVID-19. The site of lung involvement was had very crucial role in readmission with odds ratio of 4.5 for peribronchovascular distribution or central involvement and odds ratio of 4.16 for basal lung involvement. The readmission rate was 3.1% for 1 week after discharge, 7.6% for 1 month after discharge, and 8.6% for 2 months after discharge.


One of the main limitations in the present study was small sample size which makes it hard to generalize the obtained results.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request (Additional file 1).



Coronavirus Disease 2019


World Health Organization


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Polymerase Chain Reaction


Intensive Care Units


  1. 1.

    Audrey S, Procter S. Employers’ views of promoting walking to work: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schøsler L, Christensen LA, Hvas CL. Symptoms and findings in adult-onset celiac disease in a historical Danish patient cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(3):288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ganji R, Moghbeli M, Sadeghi R, Bayat G, Ganji A. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in men and premenopausal women with celiac disease: a systematic review. Nutr J. 2019;18(1):9 (Epub 2019/02/09. eng).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Daneshfar M, Dadashzadeh N, Ahmadpour M, RagatiHaghi H, Rahmani V, Forouzesh M, et al. Lessons of mortality following COVID-19 epidemic in the United States especially in the geriatrics. J Nephropharmacol. 2021;10(1):e06.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yeo I, Baek S, Kim J, Elshakh H, Voronina A, Lou MS, et al. Assessment of thirty-day readmission rate, timing, causes and predictors after hospitalization with COVID-19. J Intern Med. 2021;290:157.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zanchetta MB, Longobardi V, Bai JC. Bone and celiac disease. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016;14(2):43–8 (Epub 2016/02/15. eng).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Micic D, Rao VL, Semrad CE. Celiac disease and its role in the development of metabolic bone disease. J Clin Densitom. 2020;23(2):190–9 (Epub 2019/07/20. eng).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bergamaschi G, Markopoulos K, Albertini R, Di Sabatino A, Biagi F, Ciccocioppo R, et al. Anemia of chronic disease and defective erythropoietin production in patients with celiac disease. Haematologica. 2008;93(12):1785–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Parra LM, Cantero M, Morrás I, Vallejo A, Diego I, Jiménez-Tejero E, et al. Hospital readmissions of discharged patients with COVID-19. Int J General Med. 2020;13:1359.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Atalla E, Kalligeros M, Giampaolo G, Mylona EK, Shehadeh F, Mylonakis E. Readmissions among patients with COVID-19. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:13700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jeon W-H, Seon JY, Park S-Y, Oh I-H. Analysis of risk factors on readmission cases of COVID-19 in the Republic of Korea: using nationwide health claims data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:5844.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    UyaroĞlu OA, BaŞaran NÇ, ÖziŞik L, Dİzman GT, EroĞlu İ, Şahİn TK, TaŞ Z, İnkaya AÇ, TanriÖver MD, Metan G, GÜven GS, Ünal S. Thirty-day readmission rate of COVID-19 patients discharged from a tertiary care university hospital in Turkey: an observational, single-center study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33:144.

  13. 13.

    Verna EC, Landis C, Brown RS Jr, Mospan AR, Crawford JM, Hildebrand JS, et al. Factors associated with readmission in the US following hospitalization with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;5(20):2021.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ramos-Martínez A, Parra-Ramírez LM, Morrás I, Carnevali M, Jiménez-Ibañez L, Rubio-Rivas M, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of hospital readmissions of COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ye S, Hiura G, Fleck E, Garcia A, Geleris J, Lee P, et al. Hospital readmissions after implementation of a discharge care program for patients with COVID-19 illness. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(3):722–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Donnelly JP, Wang XQ, Iwashyna TJ, Prescott HC. Readmission and death after initial hospital discharge among patients with COVID-19 in a large multihospital system. JAMA. 2021;325(3):304–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Battershill PM. Influenza pandemic planning for cancer patients. Curr Oncol. 2006;13:119.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dafer RM, Osteraas ND, Biller J. Acute stroke care in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Elsevier; 2020.

  19. 19.

    McBride KE, Brown KG, Fisher OM, Steffens D, Yeo DA, Koh CE. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical services: early experiences at a nominated COVID-19 centre. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90:663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rahimi MM, Jahantabi E, Lotfi B, Forouzesh M, Valizadeh R, Farshid S. Renal and liver injury following the treatment of COVID-19 by remdesivir. J Nephropathol. 2021;10(2):e10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lotfi B, Farshid S, Dadashzadeh N, Valizadeh R, Rahimi MM. Is coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with renal involvement? A review of century infection. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2020;13(4):102899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Barzegar A, Ghadipasha M, Rezaei N, Forouzesh M, Valizadeh R. New hope for treatment of respiratory involvement following COVID-19 by bromhexine. J Nephropharmacol. 2021;10(2):e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020;323:2052.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Somani S, Richter F, Fuster V, De Freitas J, Naik N, Sigel K, et al. Characterization of patients who return to hospital following discharge from hospitalization for COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020.

  25. 25.

    Inan TT, Samia MB, Tulin IT, Islam MN. A decision support model to predict icu readmission through data mining approach. InPACIS 2018: 218.

  26. 26

    Osman AA, Al Daajani MM, Alsahafi AJ. Re-positive COVID-19 PCR test: could it be a reinfection? N Microb N Infect. 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wang X, Xu H, Jiang H, Wang L, Lu C, Wei X, et al. The clinical features and outcomes of discharged coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a prospective cohort study. QJM Int J Med. 2020;113:657.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Donnelly JP, Wang XQ, Iwashyna TJ, Prescott HC. Readmission and death after initial hospital discharge among patients with COVID-19 in a large multihospital system. JAMA. 2021;19(325):304–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    McCarthy CP, Murphy S, Jones-O’Connor M, Olshan DS, Khambhati JR, Rehman S, et al. Early clinical and sociodemographic experience with patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at a large American healthcare system. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shahriarirad R, Khodamoradi Z, Erfani A, Hosseinpour H, Ranjbar K, Emami Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in the South of Iran. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Toutkaboni MP, Askari E, Khalili N, Tabarsi P, Jamaati H, Velayati AA, et al. Demographics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of 1061 patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a report from Tehran, Iran. N Microb N Infect. 2020;38:100777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rees EM, Nightingale ES, Jafari Y, Waterlow NR, Clifford S, Pearson CA, et al. COVID-19 length of hospital stay: a systematic review and data synthesis. 2020.

  33. 33.

    Islam MN, Inan TT, Rafi S, Akter SS, Sarker IH, Islam AN. A systematic review on the use of AI and ML for fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE Trans Artif Intel. 2021;1:258–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wong J, Koh WC, Momin RN, Alikhan MF, Fadillah N, Naing L. Probable causes and risk factors for positive SARS-CoV-2 test in recovered patients: Evidence from Brunei Darussalam. medRxiv. 2020.

  36. 36.

    Zapatero A, Barba R, Marco J, Hinojosa J, Plaza S, Losa JE, et al. Predictive model of readmission to internal medicine wards. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23:451–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tamhane U, Voytas J, Aboufakher R, Maddens M. Do hemoglobin and creatinine clearance affect hospital readmission rates from a skilled nursing facility heart failure rehabilitation unit? J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9:194–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Michtalik HJ, Yeh H-C, Campbell CY, Haq N, Park H, Clarke W, et al. Acute changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide during hospitalization and risk of readmission and mortality in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1191–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ben-Assuli O, Padman R, Leshno M, Shabtai I. Analyzing hospital readmissions using creatinine results for patients with many visits. Procedia Comput Sci. 2016;98:357–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Liu W, Wang J, Fan G, et al. A trial of lopinavir–ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Xiao AT, Tong YX, Zhang S. False-negative of RT-PCR and prolonged nucleic acid conversion in COVID-19: rather than recurrence. J Med Virol. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W, et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020; 200642.

  43. 43.

    Li Y, Xia L. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): role of chest CT in diagnosis and management. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214:1280–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Thompson MG, Stenehjem E, Grannis S, Ball SW, Naleway AL, Ong TC, DeSilva MB, Natarajan K, Bozio CH, Lewis N, Dascomb K, Dixon BE, Birch RJ, Irving SA, Rao S, Kharbanda E, Han J, Reynolds S, Goddard K, Grisel N, Fadel WF, Levy ME, Ferdinands J, Fireman B, Arndorfer J, Valvi NR, Rowley EA, Patel P, Zerbo O, Griggs EP, Porter RM, Demarco M, Blanton L, Steffens A, Zhuang Y, Olson N, Barron M, Shifflett P, Schrag SJ, Verani JR, Fry A, Gaglani M, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Klein NP. Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines in ambulatory and inpatient care settings. N Engl J Med. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ghiasi NVR, Arabsorkhi M, Hoseyni TS, Esfandiari K, Sadighpour T, Jahantigh HR. Efficacy and side effects of Sputnik V, Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines to stop COVID-19; a review and discussion. Immunopathologia Persa. 2021;7(2):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all people participated in the study specially Dr Seyed Alireza Javadinia for his great advice on different steps of work.


The work was fully funded by Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number 99007, 2019 to Mohammad Nematshahi).

Author information




Conceptualization; DS and MN, SAJ. Data extraction; DS, MN, FA, MN, FR. Funding acquisition; MN. Investigation; MN, DS, FA, MN. Methodology; FA. Project administration; DS and FA. Resources; MN, DS, Software; FA. Supervision; DS. Roles/writing original draft; MN, DS, FA, MN, FR. Writing—review & editing: FA, DS and SAJ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Davood Soroosh or Fahimeh Attarian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol of study was approved by Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences (IR.MEDSAB.REC.1399.004) and informed consent form was written and obtained from all patients.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There are no financial conflicts of interest to disclose for any authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Raw data for possible analysis and review studies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nematshahi, M., Soroosh, D., Neamatshahi, M. et al. Factors predicting readmission in patients with COVID-19. BMC Res Notes 14, 374 (2021).

Download citation


  • COVID-19
  • Readmission
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Iran
  • Prediction