Skip to main content

Searching for synergy: combining systemic daptomycin treatment with localised phage therapy for the treatment of experimental pneumonia due to MRSA

Abstract

Objective

Bacteriophages (or phages) are viruses which infect and lyse bacteria. The therapeutic use of phages (phage therapy) has regained attention in the last decades as an alternative strategy to treat infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. In clinical settings it is most likely that phages are administered adjunct to antibiotics. For successful phage therapy it is therefore crucial to investigate different phage-antibiotic combinations in vivo. This study aimed to elucidate the combinatorial effects of systemic daptomycin and nebulised bacteriophages for the treatment of experimental pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Results

Using a rat model of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by MRSA, the simultaneous application of intravenous daptomycin and nebulised phages was not superior to aerophage therapy alone at improving animal survival (55% vs. 50%), or reducing bacterial burdens in the lungs, or spleen. Thus, this combination does not seem to be of benefit for use in patients with MRSA pneumonia.

Introduction

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a frequent complication for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units [1]. The problem of VAP has been compounded by the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains that respond poorly to standard-of-care therapies. Alternative strategies for the treatment of VAP warrant investigation. In this context, the use of bacterial viruses (called bacteriophages or phages) for the treatment of pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been investigated using an experimental rat model designed to mimic VAP [2,3,4]. Phages were as effective as antibiotics (the glycopeptide teicoplanin) when applied intravenously (IV), each rescuing about half of the animals from severe pneumonia [2]. An ongoing challenge for phage therapy moving forward is the identification and exploitation of phage-antibiotic synergies [5]; however, in the rat VAP model, the IV phage-antibiotic combination did not synergize and still half of the animals treated with the combination succumbed to the infection [2]. To determine if altering pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters could improve the efficacy of phage therapy, phages were nebulized and administered directly to the lungs of MRSA infected rats (‘aerophages’). Aerophages were as effective as the IV phage treatment (50% survival), and the combination of locally administered aerophages and systemically administered IV phages synergized to significantly improve animal survival (> 90%) and reduce lung bacterial burdens when compared to either therapy alone [4]. We reasoned that the efficacy of aerophage monotherapy was limited once the bacterial infection disseminated, and that the combination therapy with systemic phages was most effective as it could combat both the pneumonia and subsequent bacteraemia. Using this rational, replacing IV phages with the frontline antibiotic for MRSA, linezolid, which is likely to be a more clinically acceptable approach, should be similarly effective. This, however, was not observed, and post-hoc analysis of the linezolid-phage combination revealed antagonisms in vitro, whereby linezolid (a bacteriostatic protein synthesis inhibitor) appeared to inhibit phage replication, which was mirrored in vivo [4].

Main text

Rationale

In the current report, we tested the combinatorial effects of systemic daptomycin and aerophages for the treatment of experimental pneumonia due to MRSA. Daptomycin was chosen for three reasons. First, it is a bactericidal lipopeptide antibiotic that disrupts the bacterial cell membrane [6], thus it has a mode of action that is distinct from the other antibiotics that have been tested in combination with phages in this model (glycopeptides, oxazolidinone) [2, 4]. Secondly, the daptomycin-phage combination revealed neither synergisms nor antagonisms in vitro, as determined using checkerboard assays (methods described in [2], and finally, daptomycin is not recommended for use for bronchial–alveolar pneumonia as its antibacterial effects are mitigated in the lung by surfactant, yet it has shown efficacy in the context of hematogenous pneumonia [7]. The final two points are of particular importance as they allow us to test the hypothesis that a localised aerophage therapy can be improved in combination with systemic antibiotics; we do not expect improved efficacy due to classical phage-antibiotic synergy, rather the antibiotic effects should be limited to combating bacteria that have spread to sites other than the lung.

Material and methods

Experiments were performed according to the Committee on Animal Experiments of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland approval BE83/17 and according to ARRIVE Guidelines. Detailed methods about the model were published previously [2,3,4]. Briefly, a total number of 14 male Wistar rats (Crl:WI(Han), 9–10 weeks old, Charles River, Germany) were ventilated for 4 h (10 mL/kg tidal volume, 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, 50 breaths per minute with FiO2 0.35) prior to inoculation with alpha-toxin producing MRSA clinical strain AW7 (~ 1010 colony forming units (CFU) per animal via the endotracheal tube) [8]. Animals were treated two hours after infection, and again at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. Treatment was administered in an investigator/operator blinded manner and blinding was maintained until the end of data analysis. Animals were allocated randomly (using GraphPad Prism, v7) to receive either IV daptomycin (6 mg/kg) and a nebulized placebo (filtered supernatant from the bacterial strain used for the phage propagation, n = 3 animals), or IV daptomycin and aerosolized phages (6 mg/kg daptomycin and ~ 2 × 1010 plaque forming units (PFU) of a nebulized cocktail of phage K, 3A, 2002 and 2003, n = 11 animals). This specific phage cocktail has been applied previously [2,3,4]. Phage K (Accession Number AY176327.1) and phage 3A (Accession Number NC_007053.1) were purchased from the University of Laval, Québec. Phage 2002 (Accession Number MW528836.1) was isolated from sewage water in Lausanne, Switzerland. Phage 2003 was isolated from the staphylococcal phage product of the Eliava Institute of Bacteriophages, Microbiology and Virology, Tbilissi, Georgia.

Based on our previous studies, the aerophage therapy alone results in 50% survival (Fig. 1A) [4]. We hypothesized, that the combination of aerophage treatment with IV daptomycin would increase survival to 95–100%, similar to the combination of IV phages with aerophages [4]. These estimates (alpha = 0.05, power 1−β = 0.8) required n = 11 per group (SigmaPlot 12.0). Animals were monitored for 96 h, and illness was scored as described previously [2]. Animal survival at 96 h was the primary endpoint, and lung and spleen bacterial densities were determined following euthanasia as secondary endpoints. Animals scored as severely ill or reaching the primary endpoint at 96 h were euthanized as a humane endpoint using pentobarbital (150 mg/kg) injected intraperitoneally. Control groups (placebo treated, aerophage treated alone) were published in a previous study [4] and the data is included in the current study for comparison to reduce the number of animals required for experimentation according to the 3R framework (Fig. 1A). Survival of animals was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (v7).

Fig. 1
figure1

Combination IV daptomycin and aerophages in an experimental model of VAP due to MRSA. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for rats with pneumonia due to MRSA treated with either placebo (nebulized placebo and IV placebo, n = 8) or aerophages (~ 1010 plaque forming units (PFU) of nebulized phage cocktail and IV placebo, n = 10), as reported in a previous study (4). B Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for rats with pneumonia due to MRSA from the current study, treated with either IV daptomycin (6 mg/kg and nebulized placebo, n = 3) or IV daptomycin and aerophages (6 mg/kg daptomycin IV, ~ 2 × 1010 PFU of nebulized phage cocktail, n = 11). C Bacterial densities in the lungs of animals following euthanasia. D Bacterial densities in the spleen of animals following euthanasia. The dotted line represented the limit of detection. Dapto, daptomycin; CFU, colony forming unit

Results

Three animals with pneumonia due to MRSA were treated with daptomycin IV plus nebulized placebo and each succumbed to infection within 12 h. The combination of daptomycin IV and aerophages rescued 55% of animals from infection by the end of the 96-h trial (Fig. 1B). The combination, however, was not superior to aerophage therapy alone at improving animal survival (50%, Fig. 1B), or reducing bacterial burdens in the lungs, or spleen (which we use as a marker for systemic spread of infection) (Fig. 1C).

Discussion

It is likely, particularly in critical care situations, that phage therapy will be administered adjunct to antibiotics [5, 9]. The efficacy of phage therapy in animal models has now been tested extensively, however, only few studies have directly compared the efficacy of phages and antibiotics or assessed the efficacy of antibiotic-phage combinations in vivo. Worryingly, the same antibiotic-phage combination can show either synergisms or antagonisms depending on the concentration of each agent when tested in vitro [10], and the efficacy of a given phage-antibiotic combination can depend on the laboratory method used for assessment [2, 4, 10, 11]. Robust and standardized in vitro methods assessing phage-antibiotic synergies should be developed that can accurately predict improved treatment outcomes in vivo. Additionally, in vitro experiments have shown that staggered administration of phages and antibiotics (one, then the other, as opposed to each at the same time) may be more effective than antibiotics alone for the treatment of MRSA [11], and this warrants further investigation in a model such as that used in the current study. In conclusion, combination IV daptomycin and aerophages does not appear appropriate for use in patients with VAP, thus our search for in vivo phage-antibiotic synergy in MRSA pneumonia continues.

Limitations

As for most small animal models designed to mimic human infection, the model used in this study has some limitations. First, human VAP is defined as pneumonia occurring 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation [12]. However, ventilation of rats over long time periods leads to extensive lung damage irrespective of infection and/or adequate treatment, limiting the time of ventilation in the model to 4 h. Second, VAP is usually established when a small inoculum of bacteria reaches the lower respiratory tract, where they adhere to the mucosa and start the infection [13]. In the current model, in order to establish reproducible pulmonary infection in immunocompetent rats, a high bacterial load (~ 1010 CFU per animal) had to be applied directly to the lungs via the endotracheal tube. Small reductions of the inoculum resulted in spontaneous clearance of the infection. As a consequence, the high inoculum led to severe infection whereby treatment needed to be administered quickly (2 h after infection) in order to avoid extensive mortality.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets and material used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

VAP:

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

MRSA:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

IV:

Intravenously

PK/PD:

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic

Aerophages:

Aerosolized bacteriophages administered to the lungs

CFU:

Colony forming units

PFU:

Plaque forming units

References

  1. 1.

    Papazian L, Klompas M, Luyt CE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:888–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Prazak J, Iten M, Cameron DR, Save J, Grandgirard D, Resch G, Goepfert C, Leib SL, Takala J, Jakob SM, Que YA, Haenggi M. Bacteriophages improve outcomes in experimental Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:1126–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Prazak J, Valente L, Iten M, Grandgirard D, Leib SL, Jakob SM, Haenggi M, Que YA, Cameron DR. Nebulized bacteriophages for prophylaxis of experimental ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Crit Care Med. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Prazak J, Valente L, Iten M, Federer L, Grandgirard D, Soto S, Resch G, Leib SL, Jakob SM, Haenggi M, Cameron DR, Que YA. Benefits of aerosolized phages for the treatment of pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): an experimental study in rats. J Infect Dis. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/infdis/jiab112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Valente L, Prazak J, Que YA, Cameron DR. Progress and pitfalls of bacteriophage therapy in critical care: a concise definitive review. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3:e0351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Steenbergen JN, Alder J, Thorne GM, Tally FP. Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55:283–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Silverman JA, Mortin LI, Vanpraagh AD, Li T, Alder J. Inhibition of daptomycin by pulmonary surfactant: in vitro modeling and clinical impact. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:2149–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cameron DR, Ramette A, Prazak J, Entenza J, Haenggi M, Que YA, Resch G. Draft genome sequence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain AW7, isolated from a patient with bacteremia. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/MRA.00806-19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gordillo Altamirano FL, Barr JJ. Phage therapy in the postantibiotic era. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/CMR.00066-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Gu Liu C, Green SI, Min L, Clark JR, Salazar KC, Terwilliger AL, Kaplan HB, Trautner BW, Ramig RF, Maresso AW. Phage-antibiotic synergy is driven by a unique combination of antibacterial mechanism of action and stoichiometry. mBio. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/mBio.01462-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Berryhill BA, Huseby DL, McCall IC, Hughes D, Levin BR. Evaluating the potential efficacy and limitations of a phage for joint antibiotic and phage therapy of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1073/pnas.2008007118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Torres A, Niederman MS, Chastre J, Ewig S, Fernandez-Vandellos P, Hanberger H, Kollef M, Li Bassi G, Luna CM, Martin-Loeches I, Paiva JA, Read RC, Rigau D, Timsit JF, Welte T, Wunderink R. International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) of the European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and Asociacion Latinoamericana del Torax (ALAT). Eur Respir J. 2017. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1183/13993003.00582-2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Safdar N, Crnich CJ, Maki DG. The pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: its relevance to developing effective strategies for prevention. Respir Care. 2005;50:725–39 (discussion 739–741).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Sandra Nansoz. This study was presented at the American Thoracic Society 2020 International Conference.

Funding

This work was funded by an ESICM Basic Science Award (to J. P.) by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grants Numbers 320030_176216 [to Y. A. Q., and M. H.], CR31I3_166124 [to Y. A. Q.], and 189136 [to S. L. L.]) and by an unrestricted grant from the Novartis Foundation for medical Research (to Y. A. Q.)

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JP, DRC, and YAQ designed the study. LGV, LF, MI, JP and DRC performed the experiment. LGV, LF, MI, DG, SLL, SMJ, MH, DRC, YAQ and JP analysed the data. DRC and LGV wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Prazak.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Experiments were performed according to the Committee on Animal Experiments of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland approval BE83/17 and followed the Swiss national guidelines for the performance of animal experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valente, L.G., Federer, L., Iten, M. et al. Searching for synergy: combining systemic daptomycin treatment with localised phage therapy for the treatment of experimental pneumonia due to MRSA. BMC Res Notes 14, 381 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-021-05796-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia
  • Nebulized bacteriophages
  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  • Phage-antibiotic interactions