Skip to main content

Morphological features of bronchiectasis in patients with non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis and interstitial pneumonia

Abstract

Objective

To compare the morphological features of bronchiectasis between patients with different underlying diseases, we performed quantitative analysis of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images of 14 patients with non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis (NTM) and 13 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). A 3D image of the bronchial structure was made from HRCT data. Bronchiectasis was defined as abnormal dilatation of the bronchi with the diameter greater than that of the accompanying pulmonary artery. We measured the inner and outer diameters, wall area as %total airway cross sectional area (WA%), and wall thickness to airway diameter ratio (T/D) of the 4-8th generations of bronchi.

Results

In patients with IPF, the inner and outer diameters linearly decreased toward the distal bronchi. In contrast, the inner and outer diameters of NTM fluctuated. The coefficient of variation of the outer diameters of the 6-7th generations of bronchi was larger in the NTM patients than in those with IPF, whereas no significant difference was observed in the coefficient of variation of the inner diameters between the groups. In IPF patients, WA% and T/D varied between the generation of bronchi, but the coefficient of variation of WA% and T/D was relatively small in those with NTM.

Introduction

Bronchiectasis is a progressive respiratory disease characterized by irreversible and pathological dilatation of the small- and medium-sized bronchi [1]. In recent years, the prevalence of bronchiectasis has increased due to the aging of the population and the widespread use of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and the high morbidity and mortality rates have made it a worldwide problem [2].

The etiology of bronchiectasis can be divided into two patterns. One is mainly caused by chronic or recurrent infections or other chronic airway inflammation, which causes loss of smooth muscle and elastic, leading to airway remodeling [3, 4]. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and other non-tuberculous mycobacteria are known to be the major etiologic organisms of bronchiectasis and account for a large proportion of cases in Japan [5]. The other is traction bronchiectasis, which is caused by collapse of the surrounding alveoli due to inflammation or fibrosis. Traction bronchiectasis refers to the irreversible dilatation of the bronchi and is known as an important feature of fibrotic lung disease [6]. Thus, bronchiectasis has different origins and pathological findings depending on the etiology, but little is known about the morphological features of bronchiectasis of different etiologies.

In 1980’s, computed tomography (CT) is applied to diagnosis of bronchiectasis with sensitivities of 60–100% and specificities of 92–100% [7]. Recent advances in imaging technology, such as thickness and interval of sclices, improved the diagnostic accuracy, and HRCT is the standard tool of the diagnosis of bronchiectasis [1]. However, no report has quantitatively evaluated the morphological differences between bronchiectasis due to airway remodeling and traction bronchiectasis using imaging data.

In the present study, we aimed to quantitatively compare the morphological characteristics between bronchiectasis due to nontuberculous mycobacteriosis (NTM) and traction bronchiectasis associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) by using CT workstation and 3D-images of HRCT.

Main text

Methods

Study subjects

This is a retrospective observational study and its protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine (approval number: 2019–1043). Written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective design of the study. We evaluated consecutive patients who were treated for NTM or IPF between January 2014 and December 2018. The diagnosis of NTM lung disease was made by the ATS/IDSA diagnostic criteria published in 2007 [8]. For the diagnosis of IPF, the 2018 updated guideline was used [9]. Patients who did not undergo HRCT with a slice thickness of 1.0 mm or less and those who had no findings of bronchiectasis were excluded.

Morphological analysis

We evaluated the HRCT images using a CT-3D imaging workstation (Ziostation2®, Ziosoft, Tokyo, Japan). On HRCT, bronchiectasis was defined as abnormal dilatation of the bronchi with the diameter greater than that of the accompanying pulmonary artery [10]. We measured the inner and outer diameters, wall area as %total airway cross sectional area (WA%), and wall thickness to airway diameter ratio (T/D) of the 4th-8th generations of bronchi [11].

As for the measurement procedure, we first constructed 3D images from the captured HRCT images and selected a bronchus to be measured. The path from the trachea to the target bronchus was automatically extracted. In cases the lung structure was highly deformed and automatic extraction by the application was difficult, manual plots from the trachea to bronchus were performed (Fig. 1). Once the bronchi are extracted, the bronchial cross section at the specified position is displayed and the inner and outer diameters are marked. Once the marking was confirmed, the inner and outer diameters, WA%, and T/D ratio were automatically calculated for the 4th-8th generations of bronchi. Since intrapulmonary structures were distinguished by CT values, manual corrections were made when there was a large discrepancy between the outer and inner wall markings. Three points were measured for each generation of bronchial tubes, and the average of these points was used to calculate the value. When the distance to the branch of the bronchus was too short to obtain three measurement points, one or two points were measured and the average was calculated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Measurement procedure using a CT-3D imaging workstation. The bronchus to be measured was selected on the left CT image, and a bronchial pathway was created by automatic extraction (top). The bronchial cross section at the specified position is displayed and the inner and outer diameters are marked (bottom left). The inner and outer diameters, WA%, and T/D ratio were automatically calculated for the 4th-8th generations of bronchi (bottom right). L: lumen diameter, T: wall thickness, D: overall bronchial diameter. In the measurement screen, multiple measurements of T, D, and L are made, and their average are calculated

Statistics

Data were presented as means and standard deviations, and the coefficient of variation was calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the mean value. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP 15 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

A total 27 patients, 14 with NTM and 13 with IPF, were included in this study. All of the IPF patients were diagnosed solely with HRCT that revealed a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern in 12 patients and a probable UIP pattern in one. None of the study subjects underwent lung biopsy.

The mean age of the patients with NTM was 76.2 ± 6.7 years; 27% were male, 14% had smoking history. On the other hand, the mean age of the IPF patients was 68.9 ± 8.1 years; 77% were male, 92% had smoking history. There was no significant difference in age between the patients with NTM and those with IPF. In terms of gender, there were more females in the NTM group and more males in the IPF group. Most of the IPF patients were smokers. The lung function data showed decreases in %FVC (58.1 ± 14.6%), and %DLCO (46.9 ± 18.1%), suggesting that most of the IPF patients included had moderate or severe disease.

Morphological parameters

The morphological parameters of bronchiectasis evaluated in this study were summarized in Fig. 2. Line graphs were made for four items: inner diameter, outer diameter, WA%, and T/D ratio. The graphs were created by calculating the ratios of the measurements for the 5th to 8th generations of bronchi, using the 4th generation bronchi as a reference.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Morphological parameters of bronchiectasis. A Outer diameter, B Inner diameter. In the patients with IPF, the outer and inner diameters decreased linearly toward the distal part of the bronchus. In contrast, some bronchi were larger at the distal part, and the outer and inner diameter measurements of a generation of the bronchi were largely different between the patients with NTM. C WA%, D T/D ratio. WA% and T/D ratio in most of the NTM patients increased linearly toward the distal part of the bronchus although the values were diverse between the subjects. In the patients with IPF, larger values of WA% and T/D ratio were observed at the distal part

In the patients with IPF, the outer and inner diameters decreased linearly toward the distal part of the bronchus (Fig. 2A, B). In contrast, in the NTM patients, some bronchi were larger at the distal part, and the outer and inner diameter measurements of a generation of the bronchi were largely different between the patients.

Contrary to the results for outer and inner diameter, WA% and T/D ratio in most of the NTM patients increased linearly toward the distal part of the bronchus although the values were diverse between the subjects (Fig. 2C, D). In the patients with IPF, larger values of WA% and T/D ratio were observed at the distal part.

Coefficient of variation of the morphological parameters

Since the results of the line graph showed that there was a large variation in the measurements between the 5th and 7th generations of the bronchi, the coefficient of variation was calculated (Table 1). In the 6th to 7th generations of the bronchi, the coefficient of variation of the outer diameter was larger in the NTM patients than in those with IPF. The coefficients of variation of the inner diameter were similar in the NTM and IPF patients. The coefficients of variations of WA% and T/D were relatively small in the NTM patients, compared to those in the IPF patients.

Table 1 Coefficient of variation

Discussion

In the presents study, morphological features of bronchiectasis were evaluated using HRCT images, comparing the patients with NTM and those with IPF. In the NTM patients, the inner diameter and outer diameter fluctuated greatly depending on the generation of the bronchus, while in the IPF patients, the inner diameter and outer diameter decreased linearly toward the distal side. In contrast, in the NTM patients, WA% and T/D ratio increased linearly toward the distal side, whereas, in the IPF patients, WA% and T/D ratio fluctuated between generations of the bronchi. In summary, the changes seen in dilated bronchi differed between NTM and IPF, with NTM having a larger lumen and thicker wall possibly due to edematous changes of the bronchial wall, and IPF having a larger lumen and thinner airway wall due to traction along with the fibrosis of the surrounding alveoli. (Fig. 3). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that evaluated morphological features of bronchiectasis using HRCT images.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic diagram of morphological features of bronchiectasis. Bronchiectasis in NTM patients has a larger lumen and thicker walls due to edematous changes of the bronchial wall, whereas IPF patients have a larger lumen and thinner airway wall due to traction along with the fibrosis of the surrounding alveoli

Lung disease, which accounts for 80–90% of NTM, is a chronic progressive disease, causing bronchiectasis [12]. Its characteristic pathologic findings include extensive granulomas affecting the airways. Peribronchial granulomas of the trachea, bronchi, and bronchioles can cause airway narrowing, and at the same time, granulomas can disrupt the muscular layer of the airway and cause bronchiectasis [13, 14]. The increased thickness of the tracheal wall seen in NTM may also reflect ulceration of the bronchial wall and edematous changes due to infiltration of inflammatory cells into the periphery of the bronchi.

On the other hand, traction bronchiectasis is a characteristic finding in fibrotic lung diseases such as IPF. Pathologically, it is a secondary dilatation of the bronchi and bronchioles as a result of contraction of the lung tissue around the airways due to inflammation, fibrosis and scarring [7]. The presence of traction bronchiectasis in IPF has been reported to correlate with the abundance of fibroblastic foci [15], which is also a predictor of poor prognosis [16]. In addition, in the UIP pattern seen in IPF, fibrosis has been found to begin in the alveolar structures and continue from the peripheral lobular margins into the more proximal airways [17].

In this study, we observed that the IPF patients had dilated bronchi with stretched and thinned walls, which were consistent with the pathological findings. However, there was no significant difference in the coefficient of variation between the distal and proximal sides, probably because we measured bronchiectasis that had already been completed after a long period of time. If the measurements had been taken at a relatively early stage of the disease, there might have been a difference between distal and proximal bronchiectatic findings.

In the present study, we included patients with NTM as a representative of chronic lower respiratory tract infections. However, NTM is caused by intracellular organisms and pathologically characterized by granulomas, which is different from most bacterial infection [18]. It remains unclear whether the results of this study can be applicable to chronic lower respiratory tract infections caused by other pathogens, such as Haemophilus influenzae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

There have been a few reports about the distribution of bronchiectasis, and the spatial heterogeneity of the disease makes it difficult to reach a consensus. Reid described that, in cylindrical bronchiectasis, the average numbers of bronchial subdivisions were 7.5 on bronchogram but 16 in histopathology [19]. Recently, Ikezoe and colleagues reported that thickening of the airway wall and dilation of the lumen were observed in the 7th to 17th generation in IPF patients [20]. They also noted that the airway lumen was dilated due to the presence of markedly non-uniform strain along the bronchioles. This may be comparable with the coefficient of variation used as a measure of variability in our study.

Conclusions

The present study indicated that the morphological features of bronchiectasis differ between NTM and IPF patients: edematous changes in the bronchial wall in NTM and tractional thinning of the bronchial wall in IPF, each condition may be reflected in the imaging findings. For clinical application, our method will be helpful when considering a diagnostic approach for patients with bronchiectasis such as intensive microbiological tests or histological examination with interstitial pneumonia in mind.

Limitations

There are several limitations to our study. Firstly, the study was conducted at only one institution and the total number of patients was small. The existence and effect of chance errors cannot be denied. Secondly, the automatic extraction of the airway by the image workstations is based on the CT values, which makes it difficult to distinguish between anatomical airway structures and transient appearance of secretions or other materials when their CT values are similar. Thirdly, we evaluated the HRCT data taken at a single time point in the patients with established bronchiectasis. Due to the lack of longitudinal data, it remains unclear whether the results of the present study can be applicable to the airways with developing bronchiectasis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

HRCT:

High-resolution computed tomography

IPF:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

MAC:

Mycobacterium avium Complex

NTM:

Non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis

T/D:

Wall thickness to airway diameter ratio

WA%:

%Total airway cross sectional area

References

  1. McShane PJ, Tino G. Bronchiectasis. Chest. 2019;155:825–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez-Garcia MA, Polverino E, Aksamit T. Bronchiectasis and chronic airway disease: it is not just about asthma and COPD. Chest. 2018;154:737–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Izhakian S, Wasser WG, Fuks L, Vainshelboim B, Fox BD, Fruchter O, Kramer MR. Lobar distribution in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis predicts bacteriologic pathogen treatment. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:791–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McShane PJ, Naureckas ET, Tino G, Strek ME. Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:647–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadowaki T, Yano S, Wakabayashi K, Kobayashi K, Ishikawa S, Kimura M, Ikeda T. An analysis of etiology, causal pathogens, imaging patterns, and treatment of Japanese patients with bronchiectasis. Respir Investing. 2015;53:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hida T, Nisino M, Hino T, Lu J, Putman RK, Gudmundsson EF, Araki T, Valtchinov VI, Honda O, Yanagawa M, Yamada Y, Hata A, Jinzaki M, Tomiyama N, Honda H, Estepar RSJ, Washko GR, Johkoh T, Christiani DC, Lynch DA, Gudnason V, Gudmundsson G, Hunninghake GM, Hatabu H. Traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis is associated with interstitial lung abnormality mortality. Eur J Radiol. 2020;129: 109073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanford W, Galvin JR. The diagnosis of bronchiectasis. Clin Chest Med. 1988;9:691–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, Fordham von Reyn C, Wallace RJ Jr, Winthrop K, ATS Mycobacterial Diseases Subcommittee, American Thoracic Society, InfectiousInfectious Disease Society of America, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DA, Behr J, Cottin V, Danoff SK, Morell F, Flaherty KR, Wells A, Martinez FJ, Azuma A, Bice TJ, Bouros D, Brown KK, Collard HR, Duggal A, Galvin L, Inoue Y, Jenkins RG, Johkoh T, Kazerooni EA, Kitaichi M, Knight SL, Mansour G, Nicholson AG, Pipavath SNJ, Buendía-Roldán I, Selman M, Travis WD, Walsh S, Wilson KC, American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, Latin American Thoracic Society, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:e44–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez-Rovira A, Kuo W, Petersen J, Tiddens HA, de Bruijne M. Automatic airway-artery analysis on lung CT to quantify airway wall thickening and bronchiectasis. Med Phys. 2016;43:5736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Little SA, Sproule MW, Cowan MD, Macleod KJ, Robertson M, Love JG, Chalmers GW, McSharry CP, Thomson NC. High resolution computed tomographic assessment of airway wall thickness in chronic asthma: reproducibility and relationship with lung function and severity. Thorax. 2002;57:247–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wittram C, Weisbrod GL. Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease in immunocompetent patients: radiography–CT correlation. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:340–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujita J, Ohtsuki Y, Suemitsu I, Shigeto E, Yamadori I, Obayashi Y, Miyawaki H, Dobashi N, Matsushima T, Takahara J. Pathological and radiological changes in resected lung specimens in mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex disease. Eur Respir J. 1999;13:535–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh SL, Wells AU, Sverzellati N, Devaraj A, von der Thüsen J, Yousem SA, Colby TV, Nicholson AG, Hansell DM. Relationship between fibroblastic foci profusion and high resolution CT morphology in fibrotic lung disease. BMC Med. 2015;13:241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sumikawa H, Johkoh T, Colby TV, Ichikado K, Suga M, Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y, Ogura T, Arakawa H, Fujimoto K, Inoue A, Mihara N, Honda O, Tomiyama N, Nakamura H, Müller NL. Computed tomography findings in pathological usual interstitial pneumonia: Relationship to survival. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:433–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leslie KO. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis may be a disease of recurrent, tractional injury to the periphery of the aging lung: A unifying hypothesis regarding etiology and pathogenesis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:91–600.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuschillo S, De Felice A, Balzano G. Mucosal inflammation in idiopathic bronchiectasis: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:396–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida Y, Takaku Y, Nakamoto Y, Takayanagi N, Yanagisawa T, Takizawa H, Kurashima K. Changes in airway diameter and mucus plugs in patients with asthma exacerbation. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0229238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reid LM. Reduction in bronchial subdivision in bronchiectasis. Thorax. 1950;5:233–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ikezoe K, Hackett TL, Peterson S, Prins D, Hague CJ, Murphy D, LeDoux S, Chu F, Xu F, Cooper JD, Tanabe N, Ryerson CJ, Paré PD, Coxson HO, Colby TV, Hogg JC, Vasilescu DM. Small airway reduction and fibrosis is an early pathologic feature of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;204:1048–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results of the present study were presented at European Respiratory Society International Congress 2020 in September 2020.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in the interpretation of the study results and review of the manuscript; CT designed and conducted all the measurements, drafted the manuscript, and performed the statistical analyses. ST planned the study and drafted the manuscript. MD, YI, MI, HT, and KT participated in the data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadatomo Tasaka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine (Approval Number: 2019-1043), and written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective design.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabe, C., Dobashi, M., Ishioka, Y. et al. Morphological features of bronchiectasis in patients with non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis and interstitial pneumonia. BMC Res Notes 15, 263 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-022-06156-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-022-06156-3

Keywords