Skip to main content

Table 2 Cancer associated pathway analysis.

From: Identification of unique expression signatures and therapeutic targets in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Pathway

T vs. N

T vs. NB

T vs. ND

NB vs. ND

Role of BRCA1 in DNA Damage Response

6.99E-07↑

4.75E-01

3.05E-09↑

2.09E-06↑

C2M DNA Damage Checkpoint Regulation

1.03E-03↑

3.53E-01

7.46E-04↑

8.07E-06↑

p53 Signaling

1.50E-02

5.85E-02

1.77E-04↑

5.11E-06↑

G1/S Checkpoint Regulation

2.94E-02

-

4.22E-02

1.47E-03↑

PPAR signaling

6.41E-02

1.33E-01

1.78E-02

1.03E-03↓

EGF Signaling

-

1.49E-02

3.94E-01

1.49E-01

p38 MARK Signaling

1.77E-01

1.69E-01

1.74E-01

1.01E-01

PDGF Signaling

2.11E-01

7.20E-03↑

8.31E-02

7.56E-02

NF-kB Signaling

2.13E-01

6.61E-02

3.03E-01

3.35E-02

ERK/MAPK Signaling

-

3.22E-01

6.64E-02

5.20E-01

VEGF Signaling

-

-

3.15E-01

1.71E-01

IGF-1 Signaling

-

-

3.83E-01

1.28E-01

TGF-β Signaling

-

-

5.00E-01

5.09E-01

cAMP-mediated Signaling

-

-

-

4.21E-01

FGF Signaling

-

4.70E-01

-

3.62E-01

  1. p-value comparison on cancer associated pathway
  2. - represent no p value showed on the IPA Canonical pathways analysis.