Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison between classifications obtained using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient or the PSAWN method (m3-1p)

From: Estimating the similarity of alternative Affymetrix probe sets using transcriptional networks

  

Elbez (11722 pairs)

  

Good

Bad

NI

 

10565 in common

46

12

42

PSAWN (12385 pairs)

Good

11

91 | 22

1 | 1

8 | 2

 

Bad

50

25 | 28

19 | 77

56 | 67

 

Inter

39

60 | 50

7 | 22

33 | 31

  1. In common: probe set pairs belonging to the categories defined respectively in our study and in the work by Elbez and co-workers. Numbers placed before (or after) the vertical lines sum up to 100 % horizontally (or vertically) and indicate how probe sets belonging to a particular category in one study were distributed in the three categories of the other study.
Back to article page

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us