Skip to main content

Table 1 Association analysis of UCP3 DNA polymorphisms with biochemical parameters among healthy Labrador Retrievers

From: The genetic association study between polymorphisms in uncoupling protein 2 and uncoupling protein 3 and metabolic data in dogs

DNA polymorphism

Genotype

GLU

T-Cho

LDH

TG

UCP3

CC (34)

97.1 ± 8.4

273.5 ± 49.0

55.9 ± 18.0

44.8 ± 21.1

-4399C/T

CT (16)

98.8 ± 14.5

237.2 ± 53.3

55.7 ± 13.5

49.4 ± 24.8

 

TT (0)

-

-

-

-

 

CC vs CT + TT

0.597

0.021 *

0.965

0.504

UCP3

TT (8)

94.5 ± 5.4

264.3 ± 49.6

55.3 ± 13.7

40.0 ± 13.5

-4339T/C

TC (27)

96.3 ± 11.5

276.9 ± 49.5

58.2 ± 20.9

50.4 ± 24.8

 

CC (15)

101.7 ± 10.4

233.5 ± 51.2

51.9 ± 5.3

42.3 ± 20.5

 

TT vs TC + CC

0.366

0.890

0.914

0.388

 

TT + TC vs CC

0.079

0.011*

0.279

0.408

UCP3

CC (15)

94.4 ± 11.9

255.5 ± 52.6

56.9 ± 16.1

51.2 ± 23.2

-4010C/T

CT (29)

98.7 ± 10.2

270.2 ± 52.2

56.5 ± 18.5

43.2 ± 21.5

 

TT (6)

100.7 ± 8.6

237.7 ± 54.7

50.0 ± 0.0

48.7 ± 24.6

 

CC vs CT + TT

0.159

0.580

0.763

0.310

 

CC + CT vs TT

0.462

0.234

0.362

0.782

UCP3

TT (8)

94.5 ± 5.4

264.3 ± 49.6

55.3 ± 13.7

40.0 ± 13.5

-930T/C

TC (27)

96.3 ± 11.5

276.9 ± 49.5

58.2 ± 20.9

50.4 ± 24.8

 

CC (15)

101.7 ± 10.4

233.5 ± 51.2

51.9 ± 5.3

42.3 ± 20.5

 

TT vs TC + CC

0.366

0.890

0.914

0.388

 

TT + TC vs CC

0.079

0.011*

0.279

0.408

UCP3

CC (35)

96.9 ± 8.4

271.6 ± 49.5

55.7 ± 17.7

44.5 ± 20.9

-803C/T

CT (15)

99.5 ± 14.8

239.1 ± 54.5

56.1 ± 13.9

50.5 ± 25.2

 

TT (0)

-

-

-

-

 

CC vs CT + TT

0.431

0.045*

0.950

0.388

UCP3

TT (15)

94.4 ± 11.9

255.5 ± 52.6

56.9 ± 16.1

51.2 ± 23.2

IVS3+26T/C

TC (29)

98.7 ± 10.2

270.2 ± 52.2

56.5 ± 18.5

43.2 ± 21.5

 

CC (6)

100.7 ± 8.6

237.7 ± 54.7

50.0 ± 0.0

48.7 ± 24.6

 

TT vs TC + CC

0.159

0.580

0.763

0.310

 

TT + TC vs CC

0.462

0.234

0.362

0.782

UCP3

GG (15)

94.4 ± 11.9

255.5 ± 52.6

56.9 ± 16.1

51.2 ± 23.2

IVS3+69G/A

GA (29)

98.7 ± 10.2

270.2 ± 52.2

56.5 ± 18.5

43.2 ± 21.5

 

AA (6)

100.7 ± 8.6

237.7 ± 54.7

50.0 ± 0.0

48.7 ± 24.6

 

GG vs GA + AA

0.159

0.580

0.763

0.310

 

GG + GA vs AA

0.462

0.234

0.362

0.782

UCP3

GG (15)

94.4 ± 11.9

255.5 ± 52.6

56.9 ± 16.1

51.2 ± 23.2

IVS5-115G/C

GC (29)

98.7 ± 10.2

270.2 ± 52.2

56.5 ± 18.5

43.2 ± 21.5

 

CC (6)

100.7 ± 8.6

237.7 ± 54.7

50.0 ± 0.0

48.7 ± 24.6

 

GG vs GC + CC

0.159

0.580

0.763

0.310

 

GG + GC vs CC

0.462

0.234

0.362

0.782

UCP3

TT (15)

94.4 ± 11.9

255.5 ± 52.6

56.9 ± 16.1

51.2 ± 23.2

IVS5-100T/C

TC (29)

98.7 ± 10.2

270.2 ± 52.2

56.5 ± 18.5

43.2 ± 21.5

 

CC (6)

100.7 ± 8.6

237.7 ± 54.7

50.0 ± 0.0

48.7 ± 24.6

 

TT vs TC + CC

0.159

0.580

0.763

0.310

 

TT + TC vs CC

0.462

0.234

0.362

0.782

UCP3

II (15)

94.4 ± 11.9

255.5 ± 52.6

56.9 ± 16.1

51.2 ± 23.2

1106delAAG

ID (29)

98.7 ± 10.2

270.2 ± 52.2

56.5 ± 18.5

43.2 ± 21.5

 

DD (6)

100.7 ± 8.6

237.7 ± 54.7

50.0 ± 0.0

48.7 ± 24.6

 

II vs ID + DD

0.159

0.580

0.763

0.310

 

II + ID vs DD

0.462

0.234

0.362

0.782

  1. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
  2. p-values were calculated by ANOVA. * and bold: p < 0.05.
  3. I: insertion, D: deletion, IVS: intervening sequence.
  4. Loci which were not observed polymorphism in Labrador retriever, or were not detected p-value are not shown.