Table 4 Regression analysis of predictors of emergency contraception (EC) awareness
From: Awareness and practice of emergency contraception at a private university in Nigeria
Variable | EC awareness n (%) | Total n (%) | Adjusted odd ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | ||||
Age (years) | |||||
≤22 | 38 (55.1) | 31 (44.9) | 69 (100) | 1.00 | |
≥23 | 19 (76.0) | 6 (24.0) | 25 (100) | 0.41 | 0.14–1.07 |
Religion | |||||
Christianity | 50 (62.5) | 30 (37.5) | 80 (100) | 1.00 | |
Islam | 7 (50.0) | 7 (50.0) | 14 (100) | 1.66 | 0.55–5.03 |
Social class | |||||
I | 15 (48.4) | 16 (51.6) | 31 (100) | 2.73 | 1.06–7.45* |
II | 29 (72.5) | 11 (27.5) | 40 (100) | 1.00 | |
III | 6 (42.9) | 8 (57.1) | 14 (100) | 3.35 | 1.03–12.01* |
IV | 7 (77.8) | 2 (22.2) | 9 (100) | 0.86 | 0.15–3.85 |
Place of childhood upbringing | |||||
Southwest | 40 (70.2) | 17 (29.8) | 57 (100) | 1.00 | |
Southeast | 4 (100) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | 0.26 | 0.02–3.72 |
Southsouth | 3 (37.5) | 5 (62.5) | 8 (100) | 3.64 | 0.92–16.76 |
Northcentral | 0 (0) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 11.57 | 0.32–1.00 |
Northeast | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 2 (100) | 0.46 | 0.01–13.31 |
Northwest | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 3 (100) | 1.39 | 0.15–9.04 |
FCT | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) | 18 (100) | 4.45 | 1.56–14.22* |
Relationship status | |||||
Single | 47 (58.0) | 34 (42.0) | 81 (100) | 1.00 | |
Cohabit with boyfriend | 8 (72.7) | 3 (27.3) | 11 (100) | 0.57 | 0.14–1.98 |
Married | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 2 (100) | 0.28 | 0.01–7.68 |
Year of study | |||||
1st year | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 7 (100) | 5.55 | 0.85–74.96 |
2nd year | 13 (56.5) | 10 (43.5) | 23 (100) | 1.96 | 0.68–5.89 |
3rd year | 26 (72.2) | 10 (27.8) | 36 (100) | 1.00 | |
4th year | 10 (58.8) | 7 (41.2) | 17 (100) | 1.80 | 0.56–5.93 |
5th year | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) | 11 (100) | 2.14 | 0.57–8.28 |