Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

A case of treatable hypertension: fibromuscular dysplasia of renal arteries

  • Dissanayake Mudiyanselage Priyantha Udaya Kumara Ralapanawa1Email author,
  • Kushalee Poornima Jayawickreme1 and
  • Ekanayake Mudiyanselage Madhushanka Ekanayake1
BMC Research Notes20169:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1835-z

Received: 18 March 2015

Accepted: 21 December 2015

Published: 2 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Renovascular hypertension accounts for 51–52 % of all cases of hypertension in the general population, but plays a major role in treatable causes for hypertension in the young. This entity consists of renal vascular atherosclerosis (90 %), commonly seen among the elderly population, and renal fibro muscular dysplasia (FMD) (10 %), predominantly seen in the young. The prevalence of clinically significant renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia is 0.4 %.

Case presentation

We present a case of treatable young hypertension in a 29 year old female, who was diagnosed with renovascular hypertension due to fibromuscular dysplasia of the left renal artery. Computed tomographic angiogram revealed significant stenosis of the left main renal artery. Diethylene triamine penta acetic acid renogram showed a small left kidney due to renal artery stenosis. She underwent left sided nephrectomy, and histology revealed features of FMD, after which she achieved full recovery with normalization of blood pressure, and did not require antihypertensive drug treatment.

Conclusions

Fibromuscular dysplasia causing renal artery stenosis, though a rare cause of renovascular hypertension, is essential to be considered in young hypertensives, even in the absence of family history of hypertension. A high index of suspicion is necessary in early diagnosis and prompt treatment, which can result in rapid and complete recovery.

Keywords

Renovascular hypertensionRenal artery stenosisFibromuscular dysplasiaAngioplastySri Lanka

Background

Renovascular hypertension is due to renal artery stenosis (RAS) leading to reduced renal perfusion activating the renin angiotensin aldosterone system, resulting in hypertension [1]. It accounts for 1–2 % of all cases of hypertension in the general population [2], and 5.8 % of secondary hypertension [3], but plays a major role in completely treatable causes of hypertension in the young. Renovascular hypertension is characterized by features like hypokalemia, young age of onset, and renal bruit [1]. This entity consists of renal vascular atherosclerosis and fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). Atherosclerosis; accounting for 90 % of RAS, is seen in the elderly and in those with high cardiovascular risk factors. Whereas FMD accounts for less than 10 % of RAS, as is seen in females between 15 and 50 years [1]. FMD is a non-atherosclerotic, non-inflammatory angiopathy which could affect any vascular bed, but mainly affects renal arteries [4]. Other rarer cause of RAS include aortitis, radiation induced arteritis, dissecting aneurysm and von-Recklinghausen’s disease. In this paper, we present a case of successfully treated young hypertension due to RAS caused by FMD.

Case presentation

A 29 year old Sinhalese Sri Lankan female, who was apparently well, presented with incidentally detected high blood pressure. She is a mother of two children, but had no history of pregnancy induced hypertension. She denied any family history of hypertension. She also complained of loss of appetite and subjective weight loss during the past few months.

Her physical examination revealed a blood pressure of 180/120 mmHg on two separate occasions, and was equal in both arms. Her pulse rate was 88 beats per minute, with no radio-radial or radio-femoral delay. There were no renal masses, and no carotid, renal or femoral artery bruits. Her cardiovascular and central nervous system examination was unremarkable, and had no evidence of retinopathy on fundoscopy. She had no peripheral stigmata of atherosclerosis, or endocrinopathies.

Her renal function tests, serum electrolytes, urine full report, full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and liver function tests were all normal. Her electrocardiogram and transthoracic echocardiogram were unremarkable.

As she was a recent onset young hypertensive, she was investigated with ultrasound scan of the abdomen which showed non visualization of the left kidney. Therefore, computed tomography angiogram (CTA) and diethylene triamine penta acetic acid (DTPA) renogram was indicated. DTPA renogram showed a small left kidney which was suggested to be either congenital, or due to RAS, with normal perfusion and function of the right kidney. CTA revealed significant stenosis of the left main renal artery, which was suggested to be due to FMD, and an accessory renal artery supplying the lower pole of the left kidney was detected (Figs. 1, 2). After evaluation of her renovascular hypertension, she was referred to a vascular surgeon and underwent left sided nephrectomy, and histology revealed features of FMD of left renal artery. She achieved full recovery with normalization of blood pressure following surgery, and is currently not on any antihypertensive medication.
Fig. 1

Close-up of CT angiogram showing significant left sided renal artery stenosis, with an atrophied left kidney, which is supplied by an accessory renal artery. There is normal perfusion and function of the right kidney

Fig. 2

CT renal angiogram showing atrophic left kidney with non visualization of the left main renal artery

Discussion

FMD is an uncommon angiopathy that predominantly affects young to middle-aged females [5], which is non-atherosclerotic, and non-inflammatory, and most commonly affecting the renal and internal carotid arteries, but may be seen in any arterial bed [4]. A pathological classification of renal artery FMD was proposed by McCormack et al. [6] and revised by Stanley [7]. Three main subtypes were identified based on the dominant arterial wall layer involved, namely; intimal, medial, and adventitial (perimedial) FMD. Intimal, medial, and perimedial FMD accounts for 5, 85, and 10 % cases of renal artery FMD respectively [2]. A study done by Alimi et al found that 66 % of cases had more than one arterial layer involved [8]. Aneurysms and dissections are considered to be complications of FMD [7].

A definite etiology of FMD is not known, though there are various theories. Genetic predisposition is proposed, as a study done by Rushton showed 60 % cases to have autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with variable penetrance [9], and a subsequent case report of disease among family members also support this theory [10]. Other proposed mechanisms of etiology are hormonal factors, mechanical trauma, metabolic and immunologic factors, and intrinsic deficiency of elastic fibers [11]. There is evidence that cigarette smoking may be a risk factor [12]. FMD is also associated with pheochromocytoma, neurofibromatosis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, Marfan’s syndrome, Alport’s syndrome, and Takayasu’s arteritis [4]. Atherosclerosis, which is its main differential diagnosis, is differentiated by being located at the ostium or proximal portion of the artery in older patients with typical cardiovascular risk factors, where as FMD occurs in the middle or distal arterial segments in younger patients with few cardiovascular risk factors [4]. Unlike RAS due to atherosclerosis, FMD rarely has deterioration of renal function with high serum creatinine levels [2]. The other differential diagnosis is Polyarteritis nodosa which shows pathognomonic multiple focal aneurysms on renal angiography [13].

FMD accounts for 10–20 % of documented RAS, with renovascular hypertension accounting for 1–2 % of hypertensives, and the prevalence of clinically significant renal artery FMD can be estimated to be about 0.4 % [2]. The commonest arterial involvement of FMD is of renal arteries (60–75 %), followed by cervico-cranial arteries with a prevalence of half that of renal arterial involvement [14], with at least two vascular beds involved in up to 28 % cases [15]. The clinical presentation may vary from an asymptomatic condition to a multisystem disease depending on the arterial segment involved, the degree of stenosis, and the type of FMD.

The commonest presentation of FMD is renovascular hypertention; usually grade 2–3, or resistant hypertension. The mechanism depends on whether the stenosis is unilateral (renin-dependent hypertension) or bilateral/unilateral with a single functioning kidney (volume-mediated hypertension) [16]. However 2/3 RAS due to FMD are bilateral [17]. Ultimately there is activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system resulting in vasoconstriction, and salt and water retention. FMD may be complicated by renal artery dissection and kidney infarction with abrupt flank pain, haematuria and rapidly progressive hypertension [18].

Various imaging methods are used in the evaluation of RAS. Duplex imaging of the renal arteries can accurately detect elevated blood-flow velocities in the proximal and distal portions of these arteries, but has a 10–20 % failure rate due to operator’s inexperience, the presence of obesity or bowel gas, respiratory renal movements, and the fact that the possibility of a stenotic accessory renal artery cannot be excluded by visualization of a single normal renal artery [19]. The current importance of ultrasound scan is the ability to predict functional recovery based on the measurement of resistive index. Captopril renography (DTPA renography) is a safe noninvasive tool used in the screening for RAS, but data regarding its reliability is inconsistent. Its efficacy is increased by administering 25–50 mg of captopril 1 h prior to injection of radioisotope, and the sensitivity and specificity decreases in the presence of azotemia, bilateral disease, or disease of solitary functional kidney [20]. Computed tomographic angiography is the most specific tool in diagnosis, where as gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography has the additional advantage of not having radiation exposure, and limited nephrotoxicity. However both modalities have high specificity, but low sensitivity [21]. The gold standard in diagnosing renal artery FMD is intra-arterial angiogram with digital substraction, but is reserved for patients for whom it is clinically justified to proceed with revascularization in the same procedure, as it is an invasive test. Multifocal stenosis with the “string of beads” appearance is characteristic of FMD, which likely indicates the presence of medial type FMD, where as other features are tubular or focal lesions [22].

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension in FMD should follow the guidelines of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure [23]. Almost all patients with RAS require at least one antihypertensive agent, and require three or more medications twice as frequently as those with cerebrovascular FMD [24]. Revascularization is the choice of treatment in patients with young hypertension refractory to pharmacological therapy, those who are intolerant to antihypertensive, those who have lost renal volume due to ischaemic nephropathy, and the goal is to cure the disease [4]. Surgical revascularization was the primary treatment modality before the introduction of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty techniques (PTA), and leads to improvement of hypertension in 60–88 % cases [24, 25]. Nowadays PTA has emerged as a mainstay of treatment for patients with FMD who meet the criteria for interventions, and leads to improvement or resolution of hypertension in 60–80 % of cases [24, 25]. It is less costly than surgical revascularization and less invasive, and can be performed on an outpatient basis and has a lower morbidity [4]. Complications of percutaneous interventions occur in 14 % of cases and usually minute but rarely renal artery perforation, dissection or segmental renal infarctions may occur [2729]. Successfully performed renal angioplasty results in substantial and rapid reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure to normal values and it correlates with a marked reduction in plasma renin activity and angiotensin II levels [4, 30]. Complete resolution of hypertension without the requirement of antihypertensive medication may be achieved only in 30–50 % cases [24, 25]. Imaging should be performed soon after revascularization process to assess the adequacy of the intervention [31], again in 6 months, 12 months and yearly there after [3]. When the criteria for revascularization are not met, or in extreme hypertension, or following failed primary surgery, or when a kidney is non-viable nephrectomy can be performed as in this case, resulting in complete cure [25].

Conclusions

FMD causing RAS, though a rare cause of renovascular hypertension is essential to be considered in young hypertensives, even in the absence of family history of hypertension. A high index of suspicion is necessary in early diagnosis and prompt treatment, which would result in rapid and complete recovery.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Abbreviations

CTA: 

computed tomography angiogram

DTPA: 

diethylene triamine penta acetic acid

FMD: 

fibro muscular dysplasia

RAS: 

renal artery stenosis

PTA: 

percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

Analysis and interpretation of patient data and literature review were done by DMPUKR, KPJ and EMME. DMPUKR guided the other authors in reporting this case and corrected the final manuscript. All authors were involved in the management of the patient. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We all express our gratitude to the patient who kindly gave consent for this case to be presented in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

References

  1. Safian RD, Textor SC. Renal artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:431–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Plouin PF, Perdu J, Alanore ALB, Boutouyrie P, Roqueplo APG, Jeunemaitre X. Fibromusculardysplasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Camelli S, Bobrie G, Postel-Vinay N, Azizi M, Plouin PF, Amar L. Prevalence of secondary hypertension in young hypertensive adults. J Hypertens. 2015;33(Suppl 1):e47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Slovut DP, Olin JW. Fibromusculardysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2004;50:1862–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Begelman SM, Olin JW. Fibromuscular dysplasia. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2000;12:41–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Harrison EG Jr, McCormack LJ. Pathologic classification of renal arterial disease in renovascular hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc. 1971;46:161–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stanley JC. Renal artery fibrodysplasia. In: Novick AC, Scable J, Hamilton G, editors. Renal vascular disease. London: WB Saunders; 1996. p. 21–3.Google Scholar
  8. Alimi Y, Mercier C, Pelissier JF, Piquet P, Tournigand P. Fibromuscular disease of the renal artery: a new histopathologic classification. Ann Vasc Surg. 1992;6:220–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rushton AR. The genetics of fibromuscular dysplasia. Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:233–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigazzi R, Bianchi S, Quilici N, Salvadori R, Baldari G. Bilateral fibromuscular dysplasia in identical twins. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32:E4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Luscher TF, Lie JT, Stanson AW, et al. Arterial fibromusculardysplasia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987;62:931–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sang CN, Whelton PK, Hamper UM, Connolly M, Kadir S, White RI, Sanders R, Liang K-Y, Bias W. Etiologic factors in renovascularfibromuscular dysplasia, a case-control study. Hypertension. 1989;14:472–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Siegert CE, Macfarlane JD, Hollander AM, et al. Systemic fibromuscular dysplasia masquerading as polyarteritisnodosa. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:1356–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray BH, Young JR, Olin JW. Miscellaneous arterial diseases. In: Young JR, Olin JW, Bartholomew JR, editors. Peripheral vascular diseases. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Yearbook; 1996. p. 425–40.Google Scholar
  15. Lüscher TF, Keller HM, Imhof HG, Greminger P, Kuhlmann U, Largiadré F, Schneider E, Schneider J, Vetter W. Fibromuscular hyperplasia: extension of the disease and therapeutic outcome; results of the University Hospital Zurich Cooperative Study on fibromuscular hyperplasia. Nephron. 1986;44(suppl 1):109–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Olin JW, Novick AC. Renovascular disease. In: Young JR, Olin JW, Bartholomew JR. Peripheral vascular diseases. 2nd ed. St. Louis: 1996. p. 321–42.Google Scholar
  17. Urban BA, Ratner LE, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional volumerendered CT angiography of the renal arteries and veins: normal anatomy, variants, and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2001;21:373–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Paris B, Bobrie G, Rossignol P, Le Coz S, Chedid A, Plouin PF. Blood pressure and renal outcomes in patients with kidney infarction and hypertension. J Hypertens. 2006;24:1649–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Olin JW, Piedmonte M, Young JR, DeAnna S, Grubb M, Childs MB. Utility of duplex scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:833–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Jaarsveld BC, Krijnen P, Derkx FH, Oei HY, Postma CT. SchalekampMA: the place of renal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Fifteen years of clinical experience. Arch Intern Med. 1997;9(157):1226–34.Google Scholar
  21. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, Maki JH, Leiner T, Beek FJ, Korst MB, Flobbe K, de Haan MW, van Zwam WH, Postma CT, Hunink MG, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Accuracyof computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:674–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kincaid OW, Davis GD, Hallermann FJ, Hunt JC. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal arteries: arteriographic features, classification, and observation on natural history of the disease. Am J Roentgenol. 1968;104:271–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72 (Erratum, JAMA 2003;290:197.).PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Weinberg I, Gu X, Giri J, Kim SE, Bacharach MJ, Gray BH, et al. Anti-platelet and anti-hypertension medication use in patients with fibromuscular dysplasia: results from the United States Registry for fibromuscular dysplasia. Vasc Med. 2015;20:447–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Trinquart L, Mounier-Vehier C, Sapoval M, Gagnon N, Plouin PF. Efficacy of revascularization for renal artery stenosis caused by fibromuscular dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2010;56(3):525–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoksbergen AW, Renwarin L, Wisselink W. Surgical treatment of renal fibromuscular dysplasia in a young child. Case Rep Surg. 2015;2015:180393.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Sos TA, Pickering TG, Sniderman K, et al. Percutaneoustransluminal renal angioplasty in renovascular hypertension due to atheroma or fibromuscular dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:274–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tegtmeyer CJ, Selby JB, Hartwell GD, Ayers C, Tegtmeyer V. Results and complications of angioplasty in fibromuscular disease. Circulation. 1991;83(Suppl I):I-155–61.Google Scholar
  29. Bonelli FS, McKusick MA, Textor SC, et al. Renal artery angioplasty: technical results and clinical outcome in 320 patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70:1041–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Airoldi F, Palatresi S, Marana I, et al. Angioplasty of atherosclerotic and fibromuscularrenal artery stenosis: time course and predicting factors of the effects on renal function. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:1210–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Edwards JM, Zaccardi MJ, Strandness DE Jr. A preliminary study of the role of duplexscanning in defining the adequacy of treatment of patients with renal artery fibromusculardysplasia. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15:604–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ralapanawa et al. 2016

Advertisement