Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case Report
  • Open Access

Spina bifida cystica and severe congenital bilateral talipes equinovarus in one twin of a monoamniotic pair: a case report

BMC Research Notes201710:771

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3108-5

  • Received: 1 September 2017
  • Accepted: 20 December 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Spina bifida and congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) are common congenital malformations which may occur together and increase morbidity. Monozygous twins are particularly at risk of these malformations and discordance in one type of malformation is typical. The occurrence of both spina bifida and CTEV in one twin of a monozygotic pair is rare.

Case presentation

A 22 year-old Cameroonian primigravida at 36 weeks of a twin gestation was received in our district hospital at the expulsive phase of labour on a background of sub-optimal antenatal care. A caesarean section indicated for cephalo-pelvic disproportion was performed and life monoamniotic male twins were extracted. The first twin was normal. The second twin had spina bifida cystica and severe bilateral CTEV. Routine postnatal care was ensured and at day 2 of life, the affected twin was evacuated to a tertiary hospital for proper management. He was later on reported dead from complications of hydrocephalus.

Conclusions

Spina bifida cystica with severe bilateral CTEV in one twin of a monoamniotic pair illustrates the complexity in the interplay of causal factors of these malformations even among monozygotic twins who are assumed to share similar genetic and environmental features. The occurrence and poor outcome of the malformations was probably potentiated by poor antenatal care. With postnatal diagnoses, a better outcome was difficult to secure even with prompt referral. Early prenatal diagnoses and appropriate counseling of parents are cardinal.

Keywords

  • Monoamniotic
  • Spina bifida
  • Talipes equinovarus
  • Discordant
  • Case report

Background

Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is the most common congenital disorder affecting the musculoskeletal system [1]. Its incidence varies from 1 to 6 per 1000 live births depending on racial differences [2]. It has a male preponderance and is bilateral in about 50% of cases [2, 3]. In most newborns the limb deformity occurs in isolation (idiopathic CTEV). In a minority of neonates, CTEV occurs in association with other congenital abnormalities of which a considerable proportion are neural tube defects, notably, spina bifida [4]. Spina bifida is caused by failure of fusion of the vertebral arches and possibly the underlying neural tube. In spina bifida occulta, the meninges herniate through the bony defect and are covered by skin while in spina bifida cystica the roof of the defect is formed by exposed neural tissue. Spina bifida is found in about 4.4% of newborns with CTEV [5] and in such cases there is an associated increased morbidity.

From a hereditary perspective, the process of twinning has been implicated in the aetiology of malformations such as spina bifida and CTEV [6]. Monozygotic twins are particularly at risk of these malformations which may occur discordantly. However, previous reports typically describe discordance in one type of malformation [7, 8]. The occurrence of both spina bifida and CTEV in one twin of a monozygotic pair is rare. In this report, we present such an unusual case and we discuss possible aetiologic factors and prognostic challenges.

Case presentation

A 22 year-old Cameroonian primigravida at 36 weeks of gestation was received in our district hospital for labour type pain for about 17 h. This was associated with continuous and abundant flow of clear fluid per vagina. She had started antenatal care visits at 19 weeks of gestation at a health center and she started receiving folic acid supplementation from then. Her immunization status was up-to-date. Her past history was negative for alcohol or tobacco consumption and she had no known family history of foetal anomalies. According to her past records, only one obstetric ultrasound scan was done at 19 weeks of gestation at a secondary hospital and had revealed a monoamniotic twin gestation with no apparent structural or growth abnormalities. Other routine antenatal laboratory investigations were unrevealing.

Obstetric examination revealed that she had presented at the expulsive phase of labour with the first twin’s presentation being cephalic. Clinical pelvimetry was suggestive of cephalo-pelvic disproportion. A caesarean section was performed and life male monoamniotic-monochorionic twins were extracted. The first twin had APGAR scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min and weighed 2800 g. The second twin had APGAR scores of 7 and 8 at 1 and 5 min and weighed 2724 g. The physical examination of the first twin was normal. The second twin had symmetrically deformed feet: the hindfeet were in equinus and varus, there was cavus of the midfeet and the forefeet were adducted and inverted (Fig. 1). In addition, the muscle tone in the neonate’s lower extremities was low. A defect in the lumbar spine through which there was considerable protrusion and exposure of the spinal cord and its coverings was also observed (Fig. 2). The Pirani score was used to grade the severity of the limb deformity in the second twin: the midfoot score was 2.5/3 (curved lateral border: 1, medial crease: 1, and talar head coverage: 0.5), and the hindfoot score was 2/3 (posterior crease: 1, rigid equinus: 0.5, and empty heel: 0.5) giving a total of 4.5/6. These findings were indicative of severe bilateral TEV in the second twin. No other abnormalities were noted on examination of the second twin.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Bilateral talipes equinovarus in the second twin

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Spina bifida cystica in the second twin

It was concluded that the twins were discordant for spina bifida and bilateral CTEV. Routine postnatal care was ensured and at day two of life the affected neonate was referred to a tertiary hospital for proper management. At the referral site, surgical repair of the spina bifida defect was planned. However, before the surgical procedure could be carried out, it was reported that the neonate had developed hydrocephalus and had died from its complications.

Discussion and conclusions

Congenital abnormalities whether concordant or discordant occur in approximately 10% of monozygotic twins. Monozygotic twins, having their origin from the same fertilized ovum, are considered genetically identical [9, 10] and they have a higher risk of concordant congenital abnormalities when compared with other twins [3, 10]. Nonetheless, previous reports suggest that the least asymmetries in physiological, environmental or mechanical events during intrauterine development may result in phenotypic differences among these twins [11]. The severe grades of the malformations in the second twin in our report makes the case perplexing especially because of the lack of previous reports for comparisons. Importantly, low-income settings possess limited resources to explore the possibility of other associated anomalies in such discordant twin pairs.

Congenital talipes equinovarus and spina bifida can be diagnosed antenatally or postnatally. Antenatal diagnosis can be conveniently done with ultrasound scan although there is a wide variation in the reported accuracy [5]. In the current report, the obstetric history revealed that an ultrasound scan was done at 19 weeks of gestation. However, there may be a transient deformity in the foetal limb in the early weeks of gestation resembling CTEV and therefore later scans are more reliable for the diagnosis [12]. Furthermore, previous reports suggest that in the course of pregnancy, the complexity of CTEV could change from isolated CTEV to CTEV associated with other abnormalities like spina bifida [13]. In our case, the lack of serial and reliable obstetric ultrasound scans significantly limited the appraisal of the sequence of development of the malformations in the second twin even though it is likely that CTEV was due to spina bifida. Observer bias leading to misdiagnosis on antenatal ultrasound cannot be underestimated as a limitation to antenatal diagnosis in a resource-limited setting.

In the current report, postnatal diagnoses of congenital malformations were made via clinical examination. With regards to CTEV, diagnosis on clinical examination is straightforward and is made on the basis of irreducible equinus, varus of the hindfoot, adduction of the forefoot, cavus, and an “empty” heel pad [6, 14]. Clinical examination allows for proper assessment of the degree of deformity contrary to prenatal diagnosis [15]. The degree of deformity could be assessed using the methods described either by Pirani or Dimeglio but the Pirani score is widely utilized because of its simplicity [5]. As concerns spina bifida, the condition is usually obvious at birth especially when it is spina bifida cystica.

Irrespective of the severity of CTEV revealed by the Pirani score, the overall prognosis of the affected twin was expected to be contingent on the management of the open spina bifida, which was likely at the origin of the deformed limbs. Open spina bifida is the most common type of spina bifida associated with brain defects and about 90% of cases with these brain defects have Chiari malformation type II [16]. This malformation involves the herniation of the cerebellum upward into the middle fossa and downward into the cervical spinal canal [17]. Subsequent compression of the respiratory centre and upper airway dysfunction lead to respiratory failure [18]. Chiari malformation type II and aqueductal stenosis are major factors implicated in the development of hydrocephalus in neonates with open spina bifida [19]. The incidence of hydrocephalus in open spina bifida usually varies between 15 and 25% [20] but rates of up to 40% have been reported [21]. Other feared complications of open spina bifida include spinal cord injury and contamination of cerebrospinal fluid and meningitis [22].

With respect to the antenatal history in the case presentation, the late start of folic acid supplementation is worth discussing. Lack of early or sufficient folic acid supplementation in pregnancy has been implicated in the development of congenital malformations including spina bifida and CTEV [23]. Even though there is much controversy on the role of folic acid supplementation in the prevention of these malformations [23], it has been reported that monochorionic twins are more likely to intensely compete for resources in utero and this may favour discordance in malformations particularly if the supplementation of a nutrient like folic acid is inadequate. In line with a previous report by Machin et al., the intrauterine environment may have been unequal for the twins in our case, possibly because of the number of cells allocated to each twin, the timing of the twinning process, and the vascular distribution from the placenta [24].

In conclusion, spina bifida cystica and severe bilateral CTEV in one twin of a monoamniotic pair illustrates the complexity in the interplay of causal factors of these malformations even among monozygotic twins who are assumed to share similar genetic and environmental features. In our case, the occurrence and poor outcome of the malformations was probably potentiated by sub-optimal antenatal care. We noted that with postnatal diagnoses, a better neonatal outcome was difficult to secure even after prompt referral in our setting. Serial obstetric ultrasounds may have helped in early prenatal diagnoses of these malformations as well as prompt counseling of the parents with regards to the high risk of a poor overall outcome and the need for multidisciplinary management.

Abbreviation

CTEV: 

congenital talipes equinovarus

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

BMK: acquired the data and prepared the initial manuscript. DA: participated in drafting and editing the initial manuscript. FLT: assisted with the literature review and edited the initial manuscript. NNB: participated in the literature search and reviewed the technical quality of the manuscript. CAD: critically reviewed the manuscript for scientific and intellectual consistency. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents of the infants for accepting the publication of this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated in this case report are included in the article.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the babies’ parents for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no funding support.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Foumbot District Hospital, Foumbot, Cameroon
(2)
Grace Community Health and Development Association, Kumba, Cameroon
(3)
Health and Human Development (2HD) Research Network, Douala, Cameroon
(4)
Mbengwi District Hospital, Mbengwi, Cameroon
(5)
Mayo Darle Sub-Divisional Hospital, Mayo Darle, Cameroon
(6)
School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
(7)
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
(8)
Department of Orthopaedics, Southend University Hospital, Essex, UK

References

  1. Bacino CA, Hecht JT. Etiopathogenesis of equinovarus foot malformations. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57(8):473–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Eastwood DM, Hicks J. Paediatric orthopaedics. In: Norman W, Christopher B, O’connel P, editors. Bailey Love’s SHORT Pract Surg. 25th ed. London: Edward Arnold Ltd; 2008. p. 576–7.Google Scholar
  3. Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and the cause of congenital club foot. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1964;46:445–63.Google Scholar
  4. Mammen L, Benson CB. Outcome of fetuses with clubfeet diagnosed by prenatal sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:497–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan R. Review article congenital talipes equinovarus: a review of current management. J Bone Jt Surg. 2007;89:995–1000.Google Scholar
  6. Lochmiller C, Johnston D, Scott A, Risman M, Hecht JT. Genetic epidemiology study of idiopathic talipes equinovarus. Am J Med Genet. 1998;79:90–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Machin GA. The phenomenon of monozygosity. In: Blickstein I, Keith LG, editors. Multiple pregnancy. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis; 2005. p. 201–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Flood K, Miller RS, Simpson L. Monochorionic twins with discordant congenital malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(Suppl. 1):256–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Boomsma D, Busjahn A, Peltonen L. Classical twin studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:872–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zwijnenburg PJG, Meijers-heijboer H, Boomsma DI. Identical but not the same: the value of discordant monozygotic twins in genetic research. Am J Med Genet. 2017;153B:1134–49.Google Scholar
  11. Ng D, Bouhlal Y, Ursell PC, Shieh JTC. Monoamniotic monochorionic twins discordant for noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Am J Med Genet. 2013;161A:1339–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bar-Hava I, Bronshtein M, Orvieto R, Shalev Y, Stal S, Ben-Rafael Z. Caution: prenatal clubfoot can be both a transient and a late-onset phenomenon. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17:457–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bar-On E, Mashiach R, Inbar O, Weigl D, Katz K, Meizner I. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of club foot: outcome and recommendations for counselling and follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2005;87:990–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wallander HM. Congenital clubfoot. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:1–25. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003619045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tillett RL, Fisk NM, Murphy K, Hunt DM. Clinical outcome of congenital talipes equinovarus diagnosed antenatally by ultrasound. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2000;82:876–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Copp AJ, Adzick NS, Chitty LS, Fletcher JM, Holmbeck GN, Shaw GM. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;30(1):15007. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nokett W, McLone DG, Bowman R. Current management strategies of hydrocephalus in the child with open spina bifida. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016;22(4):241–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dauvilliers Y, Stal V, Abril B, Coubes P, Bobin S, Touchon J, et al. Chiari malformation and sleep related breathing disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1344–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. McLone DG, Dias MS. The Chiari II malformation: cause and impact. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19:540–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sgouros S. Spina bifida hydrocephalus and shunts. Medscape. 2017. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/937979-overview. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.
  21. Elgamal EA. Natural history of hydrocephalus in children with spinal open neural tube defect. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:112. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.101801.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman BJ, Madhavan P. The spine. In: Norman W, Christopher B, O’connel P, editors. Bailey Love’s SHORT Pract Surg. 25th ed. London: Edward Arnold Ltd; 2008. p. 483.Google Scholar
  23. Pavone V, Bianca S, Grosso G, Pavone P, Mistretta A, Longo MR, et al. Congenital talipes equinovarus: an epidemiological study in sicily. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:294–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Machin GA. Some causes of genotypic and phenotypic discordance in monozygotic twin pairs. Am J Med Genet. 1996;61:216–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement